Got this at ~11:25 PM EST/USA 3/28/06 from an emerge --sync...
Updating Portage cache: 89%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name
to an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/libintl-0).
Also, updating the Portage cache gets --real-- slow around 50% through
[digest-mode reply]
ON Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:26:37 -0400 fire-eyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 13:18 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I don't know about there being a manual but one way is to have etc-update
show you the differences - that shows what's being taken out and what's
work play, leave it alone! (in computers for last ~~22
years).
Thank you for your time reading this!
Thank you in advance for any reply!
Robert G. Hays.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (main eddress)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (permanent eddress)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[digest-mode reply]
Subject:
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] tips on my 1st try at iptables?
From:
A. Khattri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Mon, 30 May 2005 23:06:36 -0400 (EDT)
To:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Frankly, I've stopped trying to grok iptables but
[digest-mode reply]
Subject:
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS CPU optimization question.
From:
Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 31 May 2005 15:08:30 -0300
To:
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sorry for taking this long to answer.
I suggest any unprivileged port that
[digest mode reply]
Grant,
This is known and well-discissed, and I applied the 'fix' and it works.
Gentoo compiles beat the tarnation out of some cpu's -- slow your
computer down by 25--33% when compiling, and maybe speed it back up when
done. If you do not have a computer that permits
[digest mode reply]
Glen
This is known and well-discussed, and I applied the 'fix' and it works.
Gentoo compiles beat the tarnation out of some cpu's -- slow your
computer down by 25--33% when compiling, and maybe speed it back up when
done. If you do not have a computer that permits on-the-fly
[digest-mode reply]
Thufir,
For good or ill, or maybe both good *and* ill!, Gentoo is basically an
experts-only distro.
(And STOP RIGHT THERE, flame-writers -- read the rest first.)
Gentoo gives absolutely *awesome* power, but *This* *Thing* *Is* *Dangerous* --
it is a loaded *and* *cocked*
Shaw Vrana wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2005 03:31 pm, Robert G. Hays wrote:
A. Khattri wrote:
Security.
BELIEVE THIS !! -- sorry for shouting, but I for one wonder whyinhell
Gentoo of all distros would even bother with rlogin... (About Choice,
of course. This is called 'the dark side
Holly Bostick wrote:
Calvin Spealman schreef:
On 5/9/05, Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're looking at years worth of standards that have been built up and
saying after all of that time they need to be changed.
Yeah, things change.
Two words: the wheel.
Holly
Holly,
N. Owen Gunden wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:07:13AM +0300, Matan Peled wrote:
Because it takes a really long time, and involves remerging packages you have
not mentioned on the command line (which you might not want remerged
automatically).
It doesn't take that long, especially with
be especially useful for very large messages and replying
to multiple messages at once.
Always there is room to move forward, so find the door that need's
unlocked and break it down.
On 5/5/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Calvin Spealman wrote:
snip
it isn't like the bandwidth
Kris wrote:
Exactly ... but it's still has some amusement value
Kristopher W. Baker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Rowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:37 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No HTML in posts?
Trey
Travis Rousseau wrote:
On 5/3/05, Calvin Spealman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/05, Travis Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipWhy not the sender's for now?
Why not the recipient's for now?
If the sender disables HTML, no one gets it. If the recipient disables
HTML, then
Spider wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 14:37 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
BOFH? Please? Probably need to knoe this one, too, methinks
Thanks,
rgh.
-
Scott Taylor - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOFH Excuse #253:
We've run out of licenses
*tappeti tap*
*click clicketi click*
there is some documentation
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 01 May 2005 18:30:40 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
nd most of the 'rest of the w-w-world' are usually in the bottom ten
percent by funniest (is that a word? // It is now!), and I asked that
same question recently, and Neil said that he has been using some kind
BOFH? Please? Probably need to knoe this one, too, methinks
Thanks,
rgh.
Scott Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 01:15 +1000, Richard Watson wrote:
emerge sys-dev/automake-1.7
Calculating dependencies
!!! Problem in sys-dev/automake-1.7 dependencies.
!!! Specific key requires an operator
Ognjen Bezanov wrote:
Hi all
I have gentoo install and a USB 2.0 Hard disk that required 500mA of power
Now under Windows XP the drive worked perfectly, but under gentoo it
wouldnt work (it have symptoms of not enough power).
Now from what i remember about the USB specification 250mA is the max
Because a lot of Linux users use a text-only mail package, and the html
stuff makes it *hard* to read. (I use graphical...)
--Because this is what thy're used to /or they have limited memory
-AND/OR- becase this is the Safe! way to do email.
-- -- (Just look at all those *loverly* security
#netmask_eth0=255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0
# For setting the default gateway
#
#gateway=eth0/192.168.0.1
gateway=eth0/192.168.1.254
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 4/29/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Sorry long delay -- slighly busy lately!
Since I was only kinda-halfway watching this thread
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:56:36 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
ah, glsa's makes a pretty good reason -- what I was referring to was
the part about the portage stuff getting whanged; wasn't *even*
referring to compile-time!
Fair point. But if no one runs the bleeding edge
Python :: (noun) :: A computer programing language that has adopted
(swallowed!) every programming construct from every other known
programming language.
(And I have red a list somewhere listing the multiplicity of languages
from which python got things -- it is literally about half of the
Knecht wrote:
On 4/20/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought: what about setting the address, gateway, etc, to be the same as
when the box runs FC? Not hard, and should guarantee connection since
the nic the router managed before. I'm sure some of us out hee could
step you through
I have a similar problem.
Somewhee in the next few weeks I intend to make a ew small changes in
the usb-storge modules to do things like periodic-by-volume SYNCs, and
maybe rail the throughput in other ways, probably with some way to
specify for what devices, especially after connects; this
PS: sender may also be [EMAIL PROTECTED] !
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:57:34AM +0200, Nicolas Litchinko wrote
[1]: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml
[2]: https://tb.ipv6.btexact.com/
Thanks. RTFM is easy. It seems that the hardest part of linux is
FTFM, i.e. Find
Thomas Drueke wrote:
Argghhh !
And the winner is of course Jerry (don't ask about Tom, though).
Here comes the solution:
When ever doing kernel configuration read the help.
Sometimes it really helps GRRR :-)
Snapshot from the help of
USB Human Interface Device (full HID) support
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:20:37 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
'll put it on the laptop when OOo finally finishes compiling, although
r20 will probably be put by then...
I'll say it again, *this* is why I only update when there is a *good*
reason to.
Are two GLSAs
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:24:40 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
snip
s -r5 ok?
Seems so. I've put it on three computers and no gotchas so far.
I'll put it on the laptop when OOo finally finishes compiling, although
r20 will probably be put by then...
I'll say it again,
James,
I don't have the answers that you are looking for myself, but I have a
couple of thoughts about 'proceedurals' that you *might* not have
thought of; please forgive my presumption if you *have* already thought
of 'em...
Have you put together a good precis of all the info from these
Maybe someone else knows, but my guess, from the numbers I see at the
top of the screen when running ::
top
suggest that this is cached stuff, maybe from cron et al, or files or
screensaver.
Somebody please enlighten us both!
rgh.
George Roberts wrote:
I started using Linux again a couple of
'One Last Word (!)'
I forgot to mention, and nobody else has either -- certain writers (
readers!) work best with media-brand-X poorly or not at all with
media-brand-Y; AFAIK, this applies to all brands, although it is not
*quite* as bad as it was a few years ago, so that fact probably
Karnik wrote:
Robert G. Hays wrote:
At Bottom.
Andreas Fredriksson wrote:
On 4/20/05, Mrugesh Karnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise, another solution (I personally have never used it, but is
possible) is to use WinRAR to extract all the contents of the ISO file
to a folder and burn
Mark, been busy, I'm in WhinedoZZZe again right now, but I'll check
what I got when I next get into Linux post it back to you.
rgh.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 4/20/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought: what about setting the address, gateway, etc, to be the same as
when the box
Thanks for the extra info!
rgh.
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2005 01:53, Robert G. Hays wrote:
'One Last Word (!)'
I forgot to mention, and nobody else has either -- certain writers (
readers!) work best with media-brand-X poorly or not at all with
media-brand-Y; AFAIK
Knecht wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 21, 2005 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update net.wlan0?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mark, been busy, I'm in WhinedoZZZe again right now, but I'll check
what I got when I next get
Nick Rout wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:40:46 -0500
Kirk Schneider wrote:
orrected script, suggest using with portage-2.0.51.
Here's a script I have to handle running the updates.
If the portage hasn't been synced that day, it will clean out
the ccache files
why do you clean ccache, doesn't
Please do not hijack threads -- bad manners bad luck getting answers.
Also, we need a *LOT* more data to be able to help, most likely.
rgh.
Qv6 wrote:
Folks:
Please!
Need help emerging vlc. Get this error when I try:
*configure: error: Cannot fine libxvidcore library...*
Any clues will be
-- and yes I have done that many so far.. grrr...
And *still* cannot boot Gentoo Linux on my real, *working*, drive.
I have a 30GB Maxtor that I used as a test/victim drive to install
Gentoo to, including dual-monitor ATI and Win4Lin5_for_win9x.
*Finally* got it all together with a little help
Re one of your rotating sigs :
Neil Bothwick, on Gentoo.Org:
Ethernet (n): something used to catch the etherbunny
You bait the ethernet with ethereggs...
(From my friend David)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi There! -- It got here. ( ;) )
rgh.
Rob wrote:
I haven't gotten any posts in a long time. Trying to post myself
doesn't seem to work either. But I get no error messages.
Rob.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Neil Bothwick
Does someone know the cheats for WindowsXP?
( Yes, but they don't work, it has too many bugs! ;) )
rgh.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Genius.
rgh.
YoYo Siska wrote:
Qiangning Hong wrote:
I have a file with special permission requirement. I want user1 and
user2 can read/write this file, user3 can read only and others can not
access it. How to set the permission bits? No ACL support.
undoable with standard acces rights
What I had to do was ::
mirrorselect -i -o somedir/somefilename
(the '-i' in there makes an interactive screen where you get to select
servers yourself)
choose the servers I wanted, and then find all the IPv6 stuff and remove
it, mostly by seeing something about ipv6 somewhere in the
Stroller wrote:
snipI'm migrating to Asterisk Real Soon Now (tm), but it certainly
won't support any of your current hardware - it's more appropriate if
you want to do VoIP, probably involving routing all your telephone
calls through it. If you have to ask, you probably don't want to use
à 15:17 -0400, Trey Gruel a écrit :
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, is:
kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
the same as:
kernel-2.6.11.4
plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
possibly not. the gentoo-sources package has its own revision numbers
(the -r
throughput this way. YMMV!
SO: to answer your question about moving things, I doubt it; I *could*
be wrong, but I doubt the move is worth-while.
Without the interface-specs on the dvd, that's really the best anyone
can say.
Best,
rgh.
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He has
Yuo know, I just *LOVE* the idea of Xboxs running Linux -- remember who
they came from? Payback's a [deleted]. *very* evil grin!
rgh. still grinning!
Mark Knecht wrote:
snip
2) In parallel look at whether to do a dedicated recorder (vs. using
an existing machine) and look at how to do
Travis Rousseau wrote:
snip
Ha I was told it would cost extra to get a computer without windows.
(somethin like $80)
Yes, *WHY* does it cost more without WindoZZZe? (Answer: Because
MonopolSoft threatens vendors into doing this.)
I suggest NOT buying from vendors that do this.
If Linux ever
'noseguy,' by any chance?
Where-the-futz do you get all these anyway?
I love 'em!...
Thanks! (and keep 'em coming!),
robert g hays.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:01:02 -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote:
*LIKE* you rolling-sig -- are these from 'noseguy,' by any chance?
Where-the-futz do you get all these anyway?
No one source. I have collected them over the last twelve years. Some are
very out of date now, I
James Hiscock wrote:
You might also say equivalent or counterpart ...
...hmmm... Dictionary.com says something else entirely:
snip
pen·dant1 also pen·dent( P ) Pronunciation Key (pndnt)
n.
1. Something suspended from something else, especially an ornament or
piece of jewelry attached
Tom Moyer wrote:
I may just not be seeing an easy way to do this, so I figured I would
ask if any one had any ideas.
I currently have 3 hard drives in my computer:
hda - Windows XP - 40 Gig
hdb - Gentoo - 120 Gig
hdc - nothing (I think it might be dead) - 30 Gig
I got Windows running in qemu and
ok, now that i've rebooted windoze again and email is -maybe- working
again, i'll finish that email. doe anybody know where i might find the
kernel-derivations and maybe patches?
thanks,
rgh.
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Trey Thank You.
That didn't make things easier, but at least I know so I don't
If the computer has a USB port, maybe you can find enable 'legacy'
(keyboard mouse) on USB; obviousy this needs a usb-capable keyboard
begged, borrowed, or bought if you don't already have one
Just a thought.
rgh.
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I have a system
Tom Moyer wrote:
I would like to swap hda and hdb.
I don't want to swap any data across the drives I just want to have
Gentoo be the only OS installed.
Linux, including Gentoo, can run from any drive in the system.
If Gentoo is not already your default boot from Grub, you can easily
make it so;
two recent messages about the two channels and optical
drives).
Swapping won't make the channel/drives any faster, you're correct.
(1/20th of one percent faster -- I doubt it, those days should be long
gone.)
rgh.
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Moyer wrote:
I
below...
Guilherme Cirne wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 17:58, Robert G. Hays wrote:
Quick guess -- kcontact keeps the eddreses for kmail.
rgh.
Guilheme Cirne wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody know why kmail-3.4.0 depends on kontact-3.4.0?
TIA,
I believe kaddressbook holds the addresses
bottom...
fire-eyes wrote:
Sorry if this is a repost, it seems to have disappeared into the bit
bucket.
I put a 3Com 3C996B-T 1000Mbps NIC in my system. It uses the tg3
(broadcom) driver, which I have compiled in.
The kernel messages show the link at 1000. The light on the NIC shows
this. The
Richard Fish wrote:
Ok, since nobody is actually bothering to _read_ article that I linked
to, let me quote a small piece:
Hey!! -- I Resent That! -- *I* read the article, and I use AMD's!
And I read the whole thing, too, *examined* the charts!
(Just so you know it wasn't wasted ;) -- Have a
Right all the way, Trey, as best as I recall, my local brother has a
Mac, which I hadda help him with a couple of times, after drooling for a
few minutes at his wonderful 87-inch -- !! -- I mean 27-inch -- --
no, I mean **23**-inch Apple monitor ;) .
rgh.
Trey Gruel wrote:
I've heard
Inlining what little I know here...
James wrote:
Hello all,
BACKGROUND:
On my portable I have this chipset:
ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 Lf [FireGL 9000], on a portable.
emerge -s ati-drivers shows:
media-video/ati-drivers
Latest version available: 8.12.10
Latest version installed:
Below...
Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 13:24 -0600, Scott Taylor wrote:
The base is pretty much a linux but as has been mentioned before, they
have plenty of hardware-specific code and their cocoa which
realistically only works on their gear
What rubbish, Mac does NOT run linux.
Right!
rgh.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005 1:44 PM, Robert G. Hays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repeating what has already been said here, the OS X kernel is (based
on?) BSD, which, technically, is not Linux'.
That said, yes, *some* linux-aps will run there...
rgh.
Like the joke says, only
Things like this are why I only update when there is something I
**really** need... smug smile
Might be time to think SLOTs?
Or maybe a re-emerge of Xmms.
luck,
rgh
Peter Karlsson wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Robert Persson wrote:
Something strange. Xmms used to work and now it doesn't. I get a
Richard Fish wrote:
Snip!
# time dd if=/dev/hda bs=64k count=16000
(time the reading of 1G of data from hda).
Feel free to adjust count to your liking...although it should be at
least twice memory. At 20M/sec you are looking at about 1G/min for reading.
-Richard
(And how many -- or rather how
I've saved your listing, when I next boot to linux, I'll dif that
against what I have (before W4L) let you know *IF* I notice something
meaningful -- kinda new to this part, too, me, but I'll try.
Might be 24+ hours before I get back from linux -- only do mail in
Netscape 7.1, which I only
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Snip!
seriously, what does it protects you against when a compromise can
probably also mount it then unmount it again as a courtesy
What Mark said ::
Just the random rm / ...
Also some *strange* internal errors I've seen over the years, and...
if the computer is
Continued at Bottom...
Nick Rout wrote:
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Might be 24+ hours before I get back from linux -- only do mail in
Netscape 7.1, which I only have in Win at the moment; working to get
linux full for my needs, which will include Netscape.
IMHO move on to mozilla, unless
68 matches
Mail list logo
