On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/8/2009 2:02 PM, Mick wrote:
(WW) xf86OpenConsole: setpgid failed: Operation not permitted
(WW) xf86OpenConsole: setsid failed: Operation not permitted
These are common and shouldn't be causing any problems. I'm not
completely clear
On 4/8/2009 3:37 PM, Mick wrote:
Wikipedia is telling me that OTF are a Microsoft/Adobe creation - is Linux
following suit and therefore xorg includes them in its list of fonts?
OpenType (the catchy name for an OTF font) is basically the successor to
TrueType, but is in theory an open
Hi all,
Is it possible to configure HAL for managing graphic card without any
xorg.conf ?
Thanks a lot,
Jacques
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jacques Montier
jacques.mont...@numericable.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to configure HAL for managing graphic card without any
xorg.conf ?
I think so, if you are using generic vesa drivers. I believe if you
need ati/nvidia binary driver you still need to
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jacques Montier
jacques.mont...@numericable.fr wrote:
Is it possible to configure HAL for managing graphic card without any
xorg.conf ?
I think so, if you are using generic vesa drivers. I believe if you
need
Paul Hartman a gentiment tapote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Jacques Montier
jacques.mont...@numericable.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to configure HAL for managing graphic card without any
xorg.conf ?
I think so, if you are using generic vesa drivers. I believe
Hi,
This morning I updated xorg-server.
I reemerged nvidia-drivers and mouse and keyboard drievers as
suggested by einfo.
I started X and keyboard and mouse were dead - but sysrq-key works and
keyboard and mouse works on the console, so the problem is X not the
hardware.
I removed
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:36:33 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
This morning I updated xorg-server.
I reemerged nvidia-drivers and mouse and keyboard drievers as
suggested by einfo.
I started X and keyboard and mouse were dead - but sysrq-key works and
keyboard and mouse works on the
On Friday 02 January 2009 15:11:07 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Since the box is dead after starting X (I only can reboot
with sysrq keys) I see no way of retrieving a logfile
for the xorg-server.
How can I get back a functional X?
- boot into maintenance mode / runlevel 1 /
On Friday 02 January 2009 16:37:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Are you using evdev and hal?
hal is the important one for autodetect to work.
BTW, is evdev usable already? Some time ago I have tried it, but have not
found (or didn't understand) alternatives for
Option Sensitivity 0.25
for mouse,
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com [09-01-02 14:39]:
On Friday 02 January 2009 15:11:07 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Since the box is dead after starting X (I only can reboot
with sysrq keys) I see no way of retrieving a logfile
for the xorg-server.
How can I get back a
Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
BTW, is evdev usable already? Some time ago I have tried it, but have not
found (or didn't understand) alternatives for
Option Sensitivity 0.25
for mouse, and
Option XkbLayout us,ru(winkeys)
Option XkbOptionsgrp:menu_toggle,grp_led:scroll
for
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com wrote:
On Friday 02 January 2009 16:37:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Are you using evdev and hal?
hal is the important one for autodetect to work.
BTW, is evdev usable already? Some time ago I have tried it, but have not
found
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com [09-01-03 03:54]:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Gaydenko a...@gaydenko.com wrote:
On Friday 02 January 2009 16:37:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Are you using evdev and hal?
hal is the important one for autodetect to work.
BTW, is evdev
Steven Susbauer stupendousst...@hotmail.com [09-01-03 03:54]:
Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
BTW, is evdev usable already? Some time ago I have tried it, but have not
found (or didn't understand) alternatives for
Option Sensitivity 0.25
for mouse, and
Option XkbLayout
Dear all,
===
Short version:
If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and
xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section
Device Driver i810 to intel in your xorg.conf. Would have been
nice if Portage had informed us of this.
If nothing else works, revert to vesa (or
Hello
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Short version:
If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and
xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section
Device Driver i810 to intel in your xorg.conf. Would have been
nice if Portage had informed
Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2008, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
Dear all,
===
Short version:
If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and
xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section
Device Driver i810 to intel in your xorg.conf. Would have been
nice if
On 9/14/08, Sascha Hlusiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the driver was renamed from i810 to intel in upstream, I vote for
Gentoo to rename the package as well, from xf86-video-i810 to
xf86-video-intel.
Second this.
Liviu
On 9/14/08, Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
glxgears won't start for me any longer (Error: couldn't get an RGB,
Double-buffered visual). Not that I would really need that one, nor any
[..]
Have you seen this error too?
Not this particular one, but I still get an error with
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:51:15 +, Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
just emerged xorg-server 1.4.0.90-r3 and when I try to
startx I get an initialization screen with a pointer that fails to
move. Afterwards I crtl-alt-backspace it shows an error message as
follows:
dlopen:
Im currently running Gentoo on an Athlon 4600+ dual core with 4Gig
ram, nVidia 7600GS video card and USB keyboard and Trackman Wheel
trackball. I just emerged xorg-server 1.4.0.90-r3 and when I try to
startx I get an initialization screen with a pointer that fails to
move. Afterwards I
Robert Stockdale IV wrote:
Im currently running Gentoo on an Athlon 4600+ dual core with 4Gig
ram, nVidia 7600GS video card and USB keyboard and Trackman Wheel
trackball. I just emerged xorg-server 1.4.0.90-r3 and when I try to
startx I get an initialization screen with a pointer that fails
Hello,
I'm looking for some advice on an amd64 system.
I have this video card:
01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 7269
Subsystem: ATI Technologies Inc Unknown device 0d03
Which is actually this card:
R580 [Radeon X1900 XT] (Secondary)
according to this
Alan McKinnon a gentiment tapote:
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote:
I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using
X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were
compiled against that version.
I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:30, Martins wrote:
I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using
X.org-7.1.0.0 or earlier, obviously because the drivers were
compiled against that version.
I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there
was an ABI change
I'm having the same problems. ati-drivers insists on using X.org-7.1.0.0
or earlier, obviously because the drivers were compiled against that
version.
I don't have the ati-drivers source code so I can't tell if there was an
ABI change that the driver enforces, or if ATI simply hardcoded the
Hi,
After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit again
with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG warning for those
who have fglrx in make.conf?
Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belongs to Xorg-7.2 however I
have masked it, is it
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:57, Martins wrote:
Hi,
After updating to latest unstable xorg-server and ati-drivers I'm hit
again with incompatible driver versions. Shouldnt be there BIG
warning for those who have fglrx in make.conf?
Looking into Xorg.log i see that xorg-server-1.2 belongs to
Hello,
ON an amd64(turion) system, upon a rountine update
I get this problem:
Emerging (1 of 2) x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 to /
* xorg-server-1.1.1.tar.bz2 MD5 ;-) ...
* [ ok ]
* xorg-server-1.1.1.tar.bz2 RMD160 ;-) ...
snip
/usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libglx.so
On Monday 16 October 2006 17:15, James wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
!!! Cannot write to '/usr/share/X11/xkb/compiled'.
[snip]
/usr/share/X11/xkb shows:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root12 Sep 4 03:24 compiled - /var/lib/xkb
/var/lib/xkb does not exist.
Any ideas what I should do?
My system is x86
After I updated to the latest xorg-server this weekend, I started
noticing that movie playback has a horizontal line across the middle
of the screen that kind of looks like the image is broken. It always
shows up when there is a lot of on-screen movement. A flash makes it
very visible. It
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 18:53, Dale wrote:
Wrong!... do man xorg.conf and you'll see that BlankTime,
StandbyTime, SuspendTime and OffTime belong in
Section ServerFlags, not ServerLayout.
I didn't have one
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
I didn't have one so I copied it from the example file. For some reason
my man xorg.conf will not come up. No error, doesn't say it is not
there, just gives me a blank look. I dunno.
This better??
Section
Dale wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
Are those options in the correct section (ServerFlags)? Do you have
'Option DPMS' in your Monitor section? Maybe you should just post
your whole xorg.conf...
-Richard
Oh, that may be it. They may not be in the right place. It was working
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 18:53, Dale wrote:
That seemed to work. Here is my current xorg.conf file:
Section ServerLayout
Identifier X.org Configured
Screen 0 Screen0 0 0
InputDeviceMouse0 CorePointer
InputDeviceKeyboard0
from xorg.conf(5x):
SERVERFLAGS SECTION
[...]
Option BlankTime time
sets the inactivity timeout for the blanking phase of the screensaver.
time is in minutes. This is equivalent to the Xorg server's `-s'
flag, and the value can be changed at run-time with xset(1x).
Default: 10 minutes.
Thomas Kear wrote:
The problem is the space in the option names. My xorg.conf has this,
works fine:
Option BlankTime 0
Option StandbyTime 0
Option SuspendTime 0
Option OffTime 10
On 14 August 2006 10:24, Dale wrote:
I got mine from xorg.conf.example. It had this in it:
# Set the DPMS timeouts. These are set here because they are global
# rather than screen-specific. These settings alone don't enable DPMS.
# It is enabled per-screen (or per-monitor), and even
Uwe Thiem wrote:
On 14 August 2006 10:24, Dale wrote:
I got mine from xorg.conf.example. It had this in it:
# Set the DPMS timeouts. These are set here because they are global
# rather than screen-specific. These settings alone don't enable DPMS.
# It is enabled per-screen (or
On 8/14/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas??
Are those options in the correct section (ServerFlags)? Do you have
'Option DPMS' in your Monitor section? Maybe you should just post
your whole xorg.conf...
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
compiling xorg-server fails on my amd64 complaining about something
not defined in a glxXXX header file. VIDEO_CARDS is set to nvidia and
nv.
Anybody had similar problems?
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elwood@agouros.de
Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen,
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:44:06 + (UTC), Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
compiling xorg-server fails on my amd64 complaining about something
not defined in a glxXXX header file. VIDEO_CARDS is set to nvidia and
nv.
I've had a couple of other programs fail with this sort of error. Using
eselect
Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
Hi,
compiling xorg-server fails on my amd64 complaining about something
not defined in a glxXXX header file. VIDEO_CARDS is set to nvidia and
nv.
Anybody had similar problems?
Try updating your emul-xlibs package to 7.0.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
hi,
I have a strange blocker on emerge -Dup world:
[blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.99 (is blocking
media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8762)
neither nvidia-glx nor nvidia-kernel is installed on my system and my
current version of xorg-server is already 1.1.0-r1. Does anyone know why
Hi,
thanks for your quick reply! I have double checked that I don't have
nvidia set in the VIDEO_CARDS section make.conf, so its a bit weird that
its pops up again. I also tried masking it, plus the older version of
xorg-server (1.0.99), but the block still comes up.
any idea?
karsten
It
On Sunday 25 June 2006 23:08, krgn wrote:
thanks for your quick reply! I have double checked that I don't have
nvidia set in the VIDEO_CARDS section make.conf, so its a bit weird that
its pops up again. I also tried masking it, plus the older version of
xorg-server (1.0.99), but the block
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Sunday 25 June 2006 23:08, krgn wrote:
thanks for your quick reply! I have double checked that I don't have
nvidia set in the VIDEO_CARDS section make.conf, so its a bit weird that
its pops up again. I also tried masking it, plus the older version of
xorg-server
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Sunday 25 June 2006 23:33, krgn wrote:
ok, I attached a file with the output of the command,
---
[nomerge ] media-video/nvidia-settings-1.0.20051122-r3
[ebuild N]
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and pressing
F1, for example.
Does anyone out there happen to know how I can once again do this?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and pressing
F1, for example.
Does anyone out there happen to know how I can once again do this?
well,
I can
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and pressing
F1, for example.
Does anyone out there happen to know how I can once
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:36, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and pressing
F1, for example.
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:36, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and
On Sunday 29 January 2006 19:44, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:36, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer
switch to VC's.
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 19:44, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:36, fire-eyes wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 29 January 2006 18:11, fire-eyes wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can
On 1/29/06, fire-eyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to xorg-server-7.0.0-rc1, and I can now no longer switch
to VC's. I used to be able to do this by holding ctl-alt and pressing
F1, for example.
Does anyone out there happen to know how I can once again do this?
From the xorg.conf
Hi all,
I was playing with the thought of installing x11 7.0 (that's modular X?)
lately to try out a few Extensions and I wondered which driver to choose
for my Nvidia GeforceGo card. Can I still continue to use nvidia-kernel
and nvidia-glx?
How is it actually with Y-windows, most of the apps and
On 1/13/06, krgn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is it actually with Y-windows, most of the apps and window-managers
that work under X won't work under Y, correct?
Y-windows is dead. Based on the mailing list archives, nobody is
working on it. It is also hard-masked pending removal from portage.
201 - 259 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
