On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:53:22 -0300
Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used
in production server environments (the slow
ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a
whole (ie, source tree,
Just because google does it, does not mean it's right. If you are going to
make a suggestion, please
make it an educated one. For example:
I prefer RHEL because of it's mature GFS, and CMAN support which is Red
Hat's implementation of
global file system and cluster computing.
Or you could even
Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used in
production server environments (the slow
ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a whole
(ie, source tree, reliability, performance),
was inhospitable. Dare I say, it was making as nauseated as we
On 2014-02-20 8:03 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
Fsacundo impolitely omitted attribution, so I have to add it back...
I said:
That is such total FUD I just can't even say anything else about it
without using some unsavory words.
You no need to be disrespectfull...
How was
On 02/20/2014 12:53 AM, Facundo Curti
wrote:
I think a "more stable" distro is better for production.
My choice is debian. I think you cant find nothing more
stable that debian...
Gentoo makes the
On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The
system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the
system? This will use all the processor and the system will be
overloaded. This means users
On 2014-02-20 7:04 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The
system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the
system? This will use all
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:40:59 +0800 Franklin Wang wrote:
I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me
the experience about them? Thanks.
We have successful experience with Gentoo on both production servers
(someone call this area enterprise, though I dislike such
Original Message
Subject: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production
environment?
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
From: Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-ser...@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-clus...@lists.gentoo.org
Hi all,
the advantage of clustering servers though is you can take one out and
update it. if you use a distributed compliation [1] and tell portage to
keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and do them together, then the
remainder do not require compilation as the compile has been
It is True. I
On 21 Feb 2014 06:33, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
the advantage of clustering servers though is you can take one out and
update it. if you use a distributed compliation [1] and tell portage to
keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and do them together, then the
remainder
Thanks for your help. The choice for HPC can be more free. I prepare to
try it in datacenter, for FTP first, and then web server, mail server
and so forth. Of course, I still think it's better to use rhel or suse
for database, CRM and others.
On 2014年02月20日 22:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot.
On 2014年02月21日 02:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Original Message
Subject: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production
environment?
Date:Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
From:Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com
To:
and what about slackware for server?
Original Message
Subject:How about the gentoo server or cluster in production
environment?
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
From: Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-ser...@lists.gentoo.org,
On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com wrote:
and what about slackware for server?
Original Message
Subject:
How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
Date:
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
From:
Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com
Maybe it's intresting, although I prefer to use red hat, suse or ubuntu
in datacenter as Google. Slackware servers're not very poppular here
On 2014年02月20日 08:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, Franklin Wang touch2...@gmail.com
mailto:touch2...@gmail.com wrote:
and what
I think a more stable distro is better for production. My choice is
debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian...
Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the
admin knows each and every aspect of the os.
This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable
On 20 Feb 2014 06:23, Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think a more stable distro is better for production. My choice is
debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian...
Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the
admin knows each and
Debian's powerful and stable, and I like apt very much. Gentoo and
arch can be used for soho. Google uses red hat in datacenter with a
customized kernel, and facebook started the project of open compute.
are several RISC processors going to die?
On 2014年02月20日
19 matches
Mail list logo
