Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:48:52 -0600, Dale wrote: > > According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565694 it has > > been fixed, I synced too early this morning to pick that up. > I synced again just a hour or two ago and I must have missed it too. It > spit out the same error as before.

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > I have thinmanifests=true as specified in some news item or post, I > think this was a mandatory change some time ago using rsync. If you really use rsync/webrsync and not git, this is unlikely: The file containing this line

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Monday 16 November 2015 17:21:07 Martin Vaeth wrote: >cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: >> I have thinmanifests=true as specified in some news item or post, I >> think this was a mandatory change some time ago using rsync. > >If you really use rsync/webrsync and not git, this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > Don't forget that in Gentoo all commits are also GPG signed. > Sure, but to be fair those signatures are only bound to the content of the commit by an sha1 hash. -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-15, Dale wrote: > >> Wasn't there a emerge option to ignore the manifest? I seem to recall >> there used to be one but it was a LONG time ago. Of course, if someone >> has tinkered with something that would be a bad thing to do. > If the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:39:29 -0800, walt wrote: > > >> I hope the gentoo devs will fix this bug before you have a chance to >> test my advice :) > According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565694 it has been > fixed, I synced too early this morning to pick that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 17:39:29 -0800, walt wrote: > > I have the same wrong size recorded in the Manifest! > > No idea why portage didn't yell at me - there seems > > to be another bug involved... > > I did the same thing today (15 Nov) and it succeeded. > > However, I ran the ebuild command on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Monday 16 November 2015 17:32:56 Rich Freeman wrote: >On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: >> Don't forget that in Gentoo all commits are also GPG signed. > >Sure, but to be fair those signatures are only bound to the content of >the commit by an sha1 hash. Ah!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:44PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2015-11-12, wrote: > >> Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems,

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Alan Mackenzie wrote: >!!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-.ebuild >!!! Got: 8493 >!!! Expected: 8580 Do you use the default (rsync) for syncing, or have you changed the method? I have the above claimed filesize (8493), but the Manifest I obtained from rsync

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 12:43, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Sunday 15 Nov 2015 12:22:39 Matti Nykyri wrote: >>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > --->8 >>> Three days later. I'm still getting this error message, but with a >>> nasty >>> twist

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Hello, Matti On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:22:39PM +0200, Matti Nykyri wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:44PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-12,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:44PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2015-11-12, wrote: Grant Edwards

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 13:01, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> Well it's not. It just checks all the manifests and complains about >> errors. It doesn't affect the building of 1.23.1-r1. Ok. I must be using some different switch then. > Ah, OK. But it causes emerge to bail out, so never

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:59:28 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > [ebuild R] sys-apps/busybox-1.23.1-r1 USE="-pam*" > > , and the error message I get on actually trying to start the update is > > !!! Digest verification failed: > !!!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sunday 15 Nov 2015 12:22:39 Matti Nykyri wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 11:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote: --->8 > > Three days later. I'm still getting this error message, but with a > > nasty > > twist in the tail. emerge -puND @world reports (amongst others) the > > > > following

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sunday 15 Nov 2015 12:56:16 Matti Nykyri wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 12:43, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I'm getting the same thing as Alan, and have been for several days. > > > >> If I were you I'ld download the latest portage snapshot. That should > >> take care of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Hello, Martin. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 02:56:42PM +, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >!!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-.ebuild > >!!! Got: 8493 > >!!! Expected: 8580 > Do you use the default (rsync) for syncing, or have you changed > the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Hello, Matti. On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 01:15:16PM +0200, Matti Nykyri wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2015, at 13:01, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> Well it's not. It just checks all the manifests and complains about > >> errors. It doesn't affect the building of 1.23.1-r1. > Ok. I must be using

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Neil Bothwick wrote: > > I deleted the busybox directory from the tree then ran emerge --sync. > The error is still there You have the same files that I have. Unfortunately, only now I actually did: $ grep busybox- Manifest EBUILD busybox-.ebuild 8580 [...] ??? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Martin Vaeth wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> I deleted the busybox directory from the tree then ran emerge --sync. >> The error is still there > You have the same files that I have. > Unfortunately, only now I actually did: > > $ grep busybox- Manifest > EBUILD

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Dale wrote: > Martin Vaeth wrote: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> I deleted the busybox directory from the tree then ran emerge --sync. > >> The error is still there > > You have the same files that I have. > > Unfortunately, only now I actually did: > >

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 2015-11-15, Dale wrote: > Wasn't there a emerge option to ignore the manifest? I seem to recall > there used to be one but it was a LONG time ago. Of course, if someone > has tinkered with something that would be a bad thing to do. If the digest failures are for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 15-11-15 at 15:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Martin Vaeth wrote: > > > Neil Bothwick wrote: [..] > > > As a temporary hack, calling "ebuild manifest" on that file is > > > probably the only reasonable way to proceed, but this

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:05:26 + (UTC) Martin Vaeth wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > I deleted the busybox directory from the tree then ran emerge > > --sync. The error is still there > > You have the same files that I have. > Unfortunately, only

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 21:33, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Hello, Matti. > > I deleted my /usr/portage (with the exception of > /usr/portage/distfiles), and ran emerge --sync again. I get precisely > the same error message, still. I rsync with rsync.europe.gentoo.org and with me the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 15 November 2015 09:59:28 GMT+00:00, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 06:45:44PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > > > On 2015-11-12, wrote: > > >> Grant Edwards

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Simon Thelen wrote: > I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this > could be a thing. No. git has (probably, I didn't check) thin-manifests = true in its metadata/layout.conf, but for rsync this should not be the case for security reasons. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Martin Vaeth wrote: > Simon Thelen wrote: > > I sync from git and none of my Manifests track the ebuilds, so this > > could be a thing. > > No. git has (probably, I didn't check) > thin-manifests = true > in its metadata/layout.conf, but for rsync this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:56:42 + (UTC), Martin Vaeth wrote: > >!!! /usr/portage/sys-apps/busybox/busybox-.ebuild > >!!! Got: 8493 > >!!! Expected: 8580 > > Do you use the default (rsync) for syncing, or have you changed > the method? > > I have the above claimed filesize

[gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 2015-11-12, wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files >> are broken for about 2/3 of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On Thursday 12 Nov 2015 18:45:44 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2015-11-12, wrote: > >> Grant Edwards wrote: > >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my > >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

On 12/11/2015 18:42, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-12, wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >>> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures

Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-12, wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >> >>> After an emerge --sync that appeared to work with no problems, my >>> "emerge -auvND world" command is reporting that the Changelong files >>> are