On 06/25/2010 12:17 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Root-NFS: No NFS server available, giving up.
VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
VFS: Cannot open root device sda5 or unknown-block(2,0)
Please append ac correct root= boot option; here are the
available partitions:
Kernel panic -
Bill Longman bill.longman at gmail.com writes:
Roc, in one of your posts, you listed your grub.conf line and, according
to the gmane entry, anyway, it looks like it's split across two lines.
Could it be that simple? Is your grub.conf entry for the kernel command
on just one line? (Genkernel
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Do you have SATA drives or IDE? If you have IDE, try changing your
fstab and grub line from sda5 to hda5. That error is caused by that
pretty much every time. Keep in mind, it doesn't matter what the drive
reports itself as when booted off the CD,
Bill Longman bill.longman at gmail.com writes:
Yikes. Sorry, I didn't look back through the thread.
Did you notice that you have an extra zero in your CONFIG_PHYSICAL:
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100
# CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is not set
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100
The default is
rocwhite168 wrote:
Bill Longmanbill.longmanat gmail.com writes:
Yikes. Sorry, I didn't look back through the thread.
Did you notice that you have an extra zero in your CONFIG_PHYSICAL:
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100
# CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is not set
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100
The
On 06/22/2010 05:35 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Yes, it's built-in. I have attached a copy of my kernel config file in the
original post.
I'll bet you don't have HUGETLBFS turned on in your kernel. It's
required for ext4.
I checked and both HUGETLBFS and HUGETLB_PAGE are enabled. Actually I
rocwhite168 wrote:
Kaddehkaddehat gmail.com writes:
it would help to also put your /etc/fstaband let us know what FS you have root
setup asin addition to your /boot/grub/grub.conf
2010/6/20 rocwhite168rocwhite168at 163.com
I used genkernel to configure the kernel. It
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has to have to
get to the point where it can
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has to have to
get to the point
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I sort of think this is in there but make sure you did the same for your
drive controllers as well. You may also want to try this link.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4173972.html#4173972
I haven't had to put that on mine but maybe something
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I sort of think this is in there but make sure you did the same for your
drive controllers as well. You may also want to try this link.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4173972.html#4173972
I haven't had to put that on mine but
On 06/21/2010 09:46 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Walter Dneswaltdnesat waltdnes.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
even start
On 6/22/10, rocwhite168 rocwhite...@163.com wrote:
fstab
--
/dev/sda1 /boot ext4noauto,noatime 1 2
/dev/sda5 / ext4noatime 0 1
/dev/sda3 /usrext4
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:00:08 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
fstab
--
/dev/sda1 /boot ext4
noauto,noatime 1 2 /dev/sda5 /
ext4noatime 0
1 /dev/sda3 /usrext4
noatime
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
I recall reading threads about problems caused by putting the root partition
on a raid volume, but I've never understood what the problems are. Is that
your situation? Maybe someone else can remind us about it.
I guess not. I'm not using RAID.
Thanks,
Bill Longman bill.longman at gmail.com writes:
Yes, it's built-in. I have attached a copy of my kernel config file in the
original post.
I'll bet you don't have HUGETLBFS turned on in your kernel. It's
required for ext4.
I checked and both HUGETLBFS and HUGETLB_PAGE are enabled.
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I did some googling. Seriously grasping at straws here. Do you have
SMP enabled? If so, do you really have a multiprocessor or multicore
machine? I ask beause I did find where someone else had SMP enabled and
it shouldn't have been. I noticed it
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I did some googling. Seriously grasping at straws here. Do you have
SMP enabled? If so, do you really have a multiprocessor or multicore
machine? I ask beause I did find where someone else had SMP enabled and
it shouldn't have
Kaddeh kaddeh at gmail.com writes:
it would help to also put your /etc/fstaband let us know what FS you have
root
setup asin addition to your /boot/grub/grub.conf
2010/6/20 rocwhite168 rocwhite168 at 163.com
I used genkernel to configure the kernel. It complained every time at
shutdown
Walter Dnes waltdnes at waltdnes.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
even start up: Root filesystem could not be
Walter Dnes waltdnes at waltdnes.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
even start up: Root filesystem could not be
22 matches
Mail list logo
