Hi all,
I promised to tell you when I cracked this nasty little
problem of mine, though it's somewhat embarrassing
for me:
in short, don't put shell scripts called ld or cc in your
/usr/local/bin.
I had an ld script to give me lists of directories
in a certain format and then forgot about its
on 2012-05-14 at 08:52 ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
9. DO NOT TOP-POST and DO trim your replies!!!
why don't you observe these yourself? you quoted the whole message you
replied to, which itself contained another full quote, which itself...
many people here complain against top-posting, but few
on 2012-05-14 at 22:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
(getting old...)
you don't say, really? what a coincidence, it's happening to me too.
anyone else getting older around here? is anyone actually getting
*younger*?
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 08:18:32AM -0300, luis jure wrote:
on 2012-05-14 at 08:52 ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
9. DO NOT TOP-POST and DO trim your replies!!!
why don't you observe these yourself? you quoted the whole message you
replied to, which itself contained another full quote, which
On May 23, 2012 9:14 AM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at
wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:59:41 +0200
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Michael Scherer writes:
1) make output:
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CALL
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:59:41 +0200
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Michael Scherer writes:
1) make output:
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/generated/compile.h
LD
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
h.v.bruineh...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17.05.2012 22:13, Michael Scherer wrote:
1) make output:
CHK include/linux/version.h CHK
include/generated/utsrelease.h CALL
I have no surefire solution, but so far everyone and their $PET seems
to have taken for granted that your toolchain is just fine and sane.
Perhaps emerge -e @system (without ccache, distcc or other
distractions) would jiggle those bits again?
--
Arttu V.
On 5/19/12, Volker Armin Hemmann
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01:00AM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
Jeez Am I _STILL_ showing up on this list of high posting people?
I've honestly worked to get below
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2012, 19:46:39 schrieb Dale:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to re-calibrate your stats
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
I didn't put them in any certain order but you
Michael Scherer wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
I didn't put them in any
On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:14:20 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
on preferring top-most would start off.
It wasn't your preference, it was your attitude, with this comment
from now on I'm going follow my habits and damn the flames.
Did you
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
the time this is a bit tedious.
Interesting... so, you have someone standing next to
On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at
wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:13:14 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:14:20 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
on preferring top-most would start off.
It wasn't your preference, it was your attitude, with this
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:47:56PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
the time this is a bit
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:05:07 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Scherer wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:14:08 -0700
ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:47:56PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer
a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook
On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:47:56 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at
wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
the
On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:02 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer
a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17.05.2012 22:13, Michael Scherer wrote:
1) make output:
CHK include/linux/version.h CHK
include/generated/utsrelease.h CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh CHK
include/generated/compile.h LD init/mounts.o ls -Al -m
elf_x86_64 -r -o
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:13:02 +0200
Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:02 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer
a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
Pandu
Michael Scherer writes:
1) make output:
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/generated/compile.h
LD init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2012-05-17 12:14 PM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will of course
comply, though with outlook express which I'm forced to use most of
the time
On Thursday 17 May 2012 20:25:01 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Outlook Express? Not even MS would attach the label flagship to
Outlook Express.
A recent experience has suggested a reason for OE to work the way it
does. Using it the way it's designed to be used, the entire conversation
so far is
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:46:39 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top
posters on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to re-calibrate your
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 10:01:00 -0700
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit
tho. Someone put alum in your water or
On Tuesday 15 May 2012 18:25:57 john wrote:
Would like to thank all guys and girls for posting. Even though I
post very little myself your posts are always excellent and there is
plenty to learn from just reading them.
There are things I can do now which I never thought possible. Thanks
Is
On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
Someone put alum in your water or something?
I blabbed
...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
- Original Message -
From: ny6...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Monday, 14 May, 2012 04:13
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
On Mon, 14 May 2012 17:26:44 +0200
Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immidiately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
where it's possible, I put my messages on
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 May, 2012 20:17
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
LD init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
init
On Mon, May 14 2012, Michael Scherer wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immidiately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
where it's possible, I put my messages on top, and I've found
more than once
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Mon, May 14 2012, Michael Scherer wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immidiately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
where it's possible, I put my messages on top, and I've
On 2012-05-14 11:26 AM, Michael Scherer a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at wrote:
in my opinion it isn't. with top posting I see the newest message
immediately, while otherwise I need page through sometimes
huge amounts of mostly obsolete comments.
This is only the case if the person who replies
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This is only the case if the person who replies doesn't trim their quoted
text - which is often the case when brain-dead top-posters try bottom (aka
inline) posting...
You should always strive to adjust you habits to
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This is only the case if the person who replies doesn't trim their quoted
text - which is often the case when brain-dead top-posters try bottom
On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:11:25 -0500
Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
This is only the case if the person who replies doesn't trim their
quoted text - which is often the case when brain-dead top-posters
try
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says
Michael,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
We generally tolerate gmail webapp users (trying to inline post on that
is hard to do but possible) and reluctantly accept the smartphone users
often have no choice as it's impossible to do anything other
On Mon, 14 May 2012 17:01:59 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
We generally tolerate gmail webapp users (trying to inline post on
that is hard to do but possible) and reluctantly accept the
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:24:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I still think Neil has the best sigs in the entire universe.
It's spooky the way his fortunes work.
They're totally random and chosen by software, I have no influence over
them.
--
Neil Bothwick
A: Because it messes up the order in
On Mon, 14 May 2012 17:26:44 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
obviously this is an ingrained habit on gentoo-users, but from
Not a habit, a preference grown from years of experience and the
practicalities of lists like this.
now on I'm going follow my habits and damn the flames.
Do you act like
On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:53:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:24:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I still think Neil has the best sigs in the entire universe.
It's spooky the way his fortunes work.
They're totally random and chosen by software, I have
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:24:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I still think Neil has the best sigs in the entire universe.
It's spooky the way his fortunes work.
They're totally random and chosen by software, I have no
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:53:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 23:24:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I still think Neil has the best sigs in the entire universe.
It's spooky the
On May 15, 2012 2:16 AM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, gmail has given me a bad habit. It defaults to
top-posting in the web client, which I don't see how to change. But
at least on the desktop I can easily move formatting around. On the
Android client it seems rather
On May 15, 2012 2:27 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, gmail has given me a bad habit. It defaults to
top-posting in the web client, which I don't see how to change. But
at least on the desktop I
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 2:27 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, gmail has given me a bad habit. It defaults to
top-posting in the web
On May 15, 2012 7:11 AM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On May 15, 2012 2:27 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Alecks Gates aleck...@gmail.com
wrote:
Personally,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
on this list.
Yo Dale,
You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1]
...@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
- Original Message -
From: walt w41...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 May, 2012 20:17
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
LD init
, 12 May, 2012 20:17
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
LD init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
LD init/mounts.o
ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
Maybe that step is correct but it sure looks strange to me. Looks
like 'ls' is being substituted
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi all,
after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
started to accumulate,
Yes, sounds like something is wrong
-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
On 05/10/2012 07:20 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi all,
after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine
for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times,
but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors
started to accumulate
59 matches
Mail list logo
