Eric Martin wrote:
> Actually, /bin/bash is a symlink -> /bin/dash on Ubuntu so dash (Debian
> ash) is the default shell on Ubuntu (and either dash or ash is on
> Debian). I found that out the hard way when I was scripting and some
> bash stuff wouldn't work properly.
>
No, /bin/bash is *always*
walt wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 05:40 PM, Dale wrote:
>> walt wrote:
>>> In linux bash is the default shell (even sh is a symlink to bash)
>>> but in
>>> other OS's other default shells prevail.
>
> Okay, okay, Alan, you're right, I have not tried every linux distro
> out there,
> but when I was a linu
On 09/20/2009 05:40 PM, Dale wrote:
walt wrote:
On 09/20/2009 02:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
The reason you don't see bash in ps is because you are not running
bash. I do,
but you obviously don't. What shell does root use per /etc/passwd?
This one:
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/b
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 21 September 2009 02:11:51 walt wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2009 02:51 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
The reason you don't see bash in ps is because you are not running bash.
I do, but you obviously don't. What shell does root use
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:01:09 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>
/bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any
runlevel either ;)
>>> Not here.
>>>
>> Now that was pointless. Whatever shell you're using, geez, seriously..
walt wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 02:51 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>>> The reason you don't see bash in ps is because you are not running
>>> bash. I do,
>>> but you obviously don't. What shell does root use per /etc/passwd?
>>>
>> This one:
>>
>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>>
>> Look
On Monday 21 September 2009 02:11:51 walt wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 02:51 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> The reason you don't see bash in ps is because you are not running bash.
> >> I do, but you obviously don't. What shell does root use per /etc/passwd?
> >
> > This one:
> >
> > root:
On 09/20/2009 02:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
The reason you don't see bash in ps is because you are not running bash. I do,
but you obviously don't. What shell does root use per /etc/passwd?
This one:
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
Looks like bash. ;-) I assume this is the d
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:01:09 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> /bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any
> >> runlevel either ;)
> >
> > Not here.
>
> Now that was pointless. Whatever shell you're using, geez, seriously...
Not quite, it demonstrated the error in assum
On 09/20/2009 10:54 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
/bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any runlevel
either ;)
Not here.
Now that was pointless. Whatever shell you're using, geez, seriously...
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 20 September 2009 22:06:44 Dale wrote:
>
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
/bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any runlevel
either ;)
>>> Not h
On Sunday 20 September 2009 22:06:44 Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> /bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any runlevel
> >> either ;)
> >
> > Not here.
>
> This is all I get for bash:
>
> r...@smoker / #
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>
>> /bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any runlevel
>> either ;)
>>
>
> Not here.
>
>
>
This is all I get for bash:
r...@smoker / # ps aux | grep bash
dale 7254 0.0 0.0
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:51:17 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> /bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any runlevel
> either ;)
Not here.
--
Neil Bothwick
In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
On 09/20/2009 09:45 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
090920 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Dbus doesn't need to be put in any runlevel,
it will be started when hald needs it.
I was wondering why Htop shows it, but it isn't in the default runlevel.
/bin/bash is also shown in htop even though bash isn't in any ru
090920 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Dbus doesn't need to be put in any runlevel,
> it will be started when hald needs it.
I was wondering why Htop shows it, but it isn't in the default runlevel.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, P
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:50:02 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Lots of other things use them as well - not just X, so thats not a
> reason (and lots of systems that dont have X but need dbus and hal). I
> would like to know why they are started in the default run-level, not at
> boot which seems
On Sunday 20 September 2009 14:50:02 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 15:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 09/20/2009 03:34 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > > Is there a "reference" list of what services should be started in which
> > > runlevels? I am interested in hald an
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 15:40 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 09/20/2009 03:34 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > Is there a "reference" list of what services should be started in which
> > runlevels? I am interested in hald and dbus in particular.
> >
> > Googling shows mostly people set them to
On 09/20/2009 03:34 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Is there a "reference" list of what services should be started in which
runlevels? I am interested in hald and dbus in particular.
Googling shows mostly people set them to the default runlevel, but I
would like a reference or reason ...
The rea
20 matches
Mail list logo
