Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-25 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote: On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:01 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote: On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly:

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-18 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly:

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:43 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: Very last comment here: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759 (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants) Per your initial post, you have: [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package: Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina- from enlightenment [snip] ../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: note:

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-18 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package: Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina- from

[gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Mick
I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is giving me a headache. All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then it fails complaining about ... hal! # emerge -1aDv x11-wm/enlightenment These are

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is giving me a headache. All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then it fails complaining about ... hal! [snip

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Mick
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly:   eukit = 1.0.999   ehal ) were not met: No package 'ehal' found e17 from svn works fine here. What version are you trying to install?

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: eukit = 1.0.999 ehal ) were not met:

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono (not relevant)

Re: [gentoo-user] e17 fails to build from svn

2011-05-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com