On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:01 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine thusly:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:43 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
Very last comment here:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759
(ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants)
Per your initial post, you have:
[ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina- from enlightenment
[snip]
../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: note:
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package:
Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina- from
I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is
giving me a headache.
All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then
it fails complaining about ... hal!
# emerge -1aDv x11-wm/enlightenment
These are
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is
giving me a headache.
All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then
it fails complaining about ... hal!
[snip
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
eukit = 1.0.999
ehal
) were not met:
No package 'ehal' found
e17 from svn works fine here.
What version are you trying to install?
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
eukit = 1.0.999
ehal
) were not met:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine thusly:
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono (not
relevant)
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did
opine thusly:
On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo