Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-21 Thread Mick
On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 16:43:49 R0b0t1 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 14:22:06 R0b0t1 wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mick wrote: > >> > OK, I know life moves on, but this move

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Friday 21 Apr 2017 00:31:47 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 20/04/2017 21:22, R0b0t1 wrote: > > And to everyone: KDE-5 doesn't exist, what you are probably referring > > to is Plasma 5. > > yes you are completely correct. But old habits die hard, and for me KDE > has always been KDE- :-) > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 20/04/2017 21:22, R0b0t1 wrote: And to everyone: KDE-5 doesn't exist, what you are probably referring to is Plasma 5. yes you are completely correct. But old habits die hard, and for me KDE has always been KDE- :-) I blame it on an old brain where most of the neurons stopped working

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread R0b0t1
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 14:22:06 R0b0t1 wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mick wrote: >> > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. >> > My konqueror:5

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread Mick
On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 14:22:06 R0b0t1 wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mick wrote: > > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. > > My konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and > > features

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread R0b0t1
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mick wrote: > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. My > konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and > features I am not happy with. Grateful for any pointers to

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread Philip Webb
170420 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 Apr 2017 19:14:10 Philip Webb wrote: >>> I've never used Konqueror as a file-manager, but regularly use Krusader, >>> which I strongly recommend for all heavy-lifting of files/directories. >> Thanks Philip, I had used Krusader in the past and you

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread Dale
Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 19 Apr 2017 19:14:10 Philip Webb wrote: >> 170419 Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> I gave up on konqueror as a browser during KDE-3 and switched to Dolphin >>> as file manager in KDE-4. Have you considered that? >> I've never used Konqueror as a file-manager, but regularly use

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-20 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 19 Apr 2017 19:14:10 Philip Webb wrote: > 170419 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > I gave up on konqueror as a browser during KDE-3 and switched to Dolphin > > as file manager in KDE-4. Have you considered that? > > I've never used Konqueror as a file-manager, but regularly use Krusader, >

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Philip Webb
170419 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I gave up on konqueror as a browser during KDE-3 and switched to Dolphin > as file manager in KDE-4. Have you considered that? I've never used Konqueror as a file-manager, but regularly use Krusader, which I strongly recommend for all heavy-lifting of

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 19 Apr 2017 23:23:41 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 19/04/2017 16:57, Mick wrote: > > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. > > My konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and > > features I am not happy with. Grateful

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/04/2017 16:57, Mick wrote: > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. > My > konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and > features I am not happy with. Grateful for any pointers to address these. > In > no particular

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Daniel Frey
On 04/19/2017 12:16 PM, Philip Webb wrote: > 170419 Mick wrote: >> konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems >> I don't know if this has anything to do with it, >> but I am not running konqueror on a full plasma desktop, >> but as a stand-alone application. > > I haven't

Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Philip Webb
170419 Mick wrote: > konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems > I don't know if this has anything to do with it, > but I am not running konqueror on a full plasma desktop, > but as a stand-alone application. I haven't tried Konqueror for a while, but my experience was that

[gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!

2017-04-19 Thread Mick
OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me. My konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and features I am not happy with. Grateful for any pointers to address these. In no particular order. 1. The Bookmarks Toolbar will *always*