On 16/09/17 06:57, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 19:56:54 CEST schrieb Andrew Lowe:
>> Hi all,
>> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
>> Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
>> thingy called "thin-provis
> On 16 Sep 2017, at 17:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:35:44 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> What really got up my nose, as mentioned above, was doing an emerge -s on
>> thing-provisioning-tools and getting told it was "tools for thin
>> provisioning".
>
> I raised
On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:35:44 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> What really got up my nose, as mentioned above, was doing an emerge -s on
> thing-provisioning-tools and getting told it was "tools for thin
> provisioning".
I raised a bug report about that once, against use.desc. There was a fl
Hello, Alan.
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 00:15:35 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 15/09/2017 23:43, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
> >> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> >>> Yes, but do I want it to go away?
On Friday, 15 September 2017 23:30:07 BST Daniel Campbell wrote:
> If you have app-portage/gentoolkit (I highly recommend it) you can run
> `equery d sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools` to find what's pulling it
> in. It's probably lvm2, which is expected if you use LVM for anything.
> If you don't
Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 19:56:54 CEST schrieb Andrew Lowe:
> Hi all,
> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
> Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
> thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have anything thin a
Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:43:15 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > > Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
> > >
> > > OK, let's t
On 09/15/2017 02:43 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
>>> OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-to
On 15/09/2017 23:43, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
>>> OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools
Tbe time and effort is minimal, one line in package.use. Profiles have nothing
to with it, the flag is turned on in the ebuild. It's not a server vs. desktop
issue either.
On 15 September 2017 22:43:15 BST, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 23:38:21 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
> > OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> > patronising garbage, nam
Am Freitag, 15. September 2017, 23:15:05 CEST schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Yes, but do I want it to go away? What is it, what does it do?
>
> OK, let's try emerge -s thin-provisioning-tools. We get back only
> patronising garbage, namely "A suite of tools for thin provisioning on
> Linux" - well, d
Hello, Neil.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 21:47:01 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 01:56:54 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> > I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three
> > versions of Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I
> > noticed a thingy ca
On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 01:56:54 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three
> versions of Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I
> noticed a thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have
> anything thin and I don't provisio
Hi all,
I posted about a nasty infection my machine had with three versions of
Ruby a few days ago. In the process of trying to fix that I noticed a
thingy called "thin-provisioning-tools". I don't have anything thin and
I don't provision anything so why I ask?
From what I've been
15 matches
Mail list logo