140429 Philip Webb wrote:
140429 Neil Bothwick wrote:
PW The ebuild has a long list of possible editors,
incl Vim Ed Nano, but nothing singling out Nano.
NB Except that nano is first in the list and portage takes
the first available dependency as satisfying the virtual.
PW Doesn't Portage check
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Usually nano can be removed with emerge --depclean
Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force deprecated.
Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that. Brute force, maybe, but it
is the answer.
I've checked 'man
140429 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force deprecated.
Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
root:565 ~ emerge -C nano
* This action can remove important packages! In order to be
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:16:03 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:17:08 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force deprecated.
Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
root:565 ~ emerge -C nano
* This action can remove
140429 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:16:03 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
PW Yes, I can do 'emerge -C nano', but that is brute force deprecated.
NB Deprecated? Really? I must have missed that.
PW * This action can remove important packages!
* In order to be safer, use `emerge -pv
On Tuesday 29 Apr 2014 08:19:15 Philip Webb wrote:
I sometimes have the feeling Portage's behaviour is not fully thought out
often that Portage advisory messages are written by Martians (grin).
Regular readers* will know that I have my problems with portage from time to
time, but accusing it
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
that virtual/editor requires it that @system requires virtual/editor .
How can I tell Portage that Vim or Ed satisfy virtual/editor ?
--
On 04/28/2014 07:32 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
that virtual/editor requires it that @system requires virtual/editor .
How can I tell Portage that Vim or Ed satisfy
On Monday 28 Apr 2014 15:32:22 Philip Webb wrote:
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
that virtual/editor requires it that @system requires virtual/editor
.
How can I tell Portage that Vim or Ed satisfy
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:32:22AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
that virtual/editor requires it that @system requires virtual/editor .
How can I tell Portage that Vim or Ed
Philip Webb wrote:
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
that virtual/editor requires it that @system requires virtual/editor .
How can I tell Portage that Vim or Ed satisfy virtual/editor ?
As Mick said, it
140428 Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:32:22AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
I never use Nano -- Vim or Ed are available in a raw terminal --
would like to unmerge it, but Portage tells me
virtual/editor requires it @system requires virtual/editor .
You can set
12 matches
Mail list logo
