On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Macintosh non-volatile memory driver v1.1
PCI: Enabling device :00:10.0 (0006 - 0007)
radeonfb (:00:10.0): Invalid ROM signature 0 should be 0xaa55
radeonfb: Retrieved PLL infos from Open Firmware
OK, so I then booted from the hard drive and modified /etc/yaboot.conf
like this:
image=/boot/kernel-2.6.24-gentoo-r3
label=2.6.24-gentoo-r3
root=/dev/hda4
partition=4
append=video=radeonfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
read-only
Unfortunately when I reboot from the
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:59:46 -0300
Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ubuntu patch indeed. For those interested:
...
Thanks for the source overview
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
Never was a card. This is an on-board ethernet, just
as previously. More background: this is a new mobo and
new video card but the same cpu.
And the same installation? So as far as the system is concerned, you have
changed the
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 10:29:09 Michael Schmarck wrote:
Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed knode to see how Usenet has changed since I first
used it 15 years ago, and I'm astonished to find that the default
colours include white text on a white background for
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote:
Roy Wright wrote:
| Grant wrote:
| An oc'ed cpu needs a lot more powergenerates a lot more heat. Both
can damage
| the CPU AND the mobo (too much power might fry a regulator, or cook
a cap).
| Or it might overload the PSU - and then
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote:
Has anybody else who recently posted to the list gotten an email bounce
for a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Overclocking when done properly, is very safe. There are TONS of sites
out there to help with the research. And there are an equal ammount of
hardware that can safely support Overclocking.
So word from the wise (trial and error wise), take your time, do your
research and always take baby steps.
Peter Ruskin peter.ruskin at dsl.pipex.com writes:
Open Office can do all that.
I already tried that, so I must be missing some info
?
james
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received my RMAed motherboard back from MSI today, and although it
powered right on, the BIOS wouldn't post unless I disconnected the
CDROM drive and used a different CPU. I had been overclocking an
AMD64 X2 but luckily I had
Hi,
after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
unpleasant surprises.
Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ?
Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently)
/etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc/rc.conf ?)
/etc/conf.d/net seems to have gone
this inhibited
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
Overclocking when done properly, is very safe. There are TONS of sites
out there to help with the research.
I know that sites. And a lot of ocing results in strange and hidden problems.
Add to that my hatred for people RMA'ing boards until
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
unpleasant surprises.
Because you didn't read the elog messages.
Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ?
Yes, and emerge tells you to read it:
You should now
On 4/17/08, Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
unpleasant surprises.
Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ?
Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently)
/etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now
On 16:03 Thu 17 Apr , Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
unpleasant surprises.
Is there an upgrade guide anywhere ?
Maybe some problems are causes by myself (accidently)
/etc/conf.d/rc seems to have gone (now /etc/rc.conf
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
unpleasant surprises.
Because you didn't read the elog messages.
it is still not ok to remove
Hi,
does anybody know where the message
you have cruft in /proc remove it
comes from and what to do about it.
(It seems to be new with baselayout-2.0.0/openrc
but it's not mentioned in the upgrade guide)
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH -
Hi,
on boot I get
(with baselayout-2.0.0/openrc)
the message
* Bringing up interface ppp0
* Starting pppd in ppp0 ...
[ ok ]
* received address 87.67.162.56
* WARNING: net.ppp0 not under our control, aborting
What does that mean and what can I do about it?
I think I've followed the
As per the subject:
I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like
to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have
tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is
unbearably slow (being on a laptop). What would be the best solution
to back up
Hi folks,
according to the mesa web site, mesa-7.0.2 contains a 3d driver for
openchrome. Unfortunately, the ebuild knows only about a very limited
number of video cards, openchrome not amoung them. How can I convince
it to compile the openchrome 3d driver?
Uwe
--
Informal Linux Group
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch, 16. April 2008, Eric Martin wrote:
Has anybody else who recently posted to the list gotten an email bounce
for a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes
Here to, so +1.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote:
As per the subject:
I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like
to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have
tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is
unbearably slow
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the
-p option
Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
Hello everyone,
Although perfectly aware that this is a much subjective business, I am
looking for best fonts, and would much appreciate your sharing of
personal choices. This Wiki article [1] has some insight, but not
sufficient to satisfy my quest.
For best printed output I have settled for
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Because you didn't read the elog messages.
it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid.
It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I
upgraded. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 was removed on
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:54:50 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote:
I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like
to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have
tried duplicity, but when many changes have occured, this is
unbearably slow (being on a laptop). What
quoth the Liviu Andronic:
So, what font do you use for the User Interface?
Happy with Bitstream Vera Sans myself. Clean, clear, and looks good. For fixed
I use Courier 10-pitch.
-d
--
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org
...the number of UNIX
At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:16:54 +0200,
Florian Philipp wrote:
I personally use dar and gpg. Dar can be used to make incremental
backups which should partly solve your speed problem. Alternatively you
could use tar and gpg or cpio or whatever floats your boat.
Duplicity also does incremental
Hi guys,
to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2?
Thanks,
justin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the
-p option
Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes.
Bye...
Dirk
no, the thing is,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Florian Philipp wrote:
| On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 17:54 +0200, Jan Seeger wrote:
| As per the subject:
|
| I use luks-crypt to encrypt my home directory. Of course I would like
| to make backups. These must, of course, also be encrypted. I have
|
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the
-p option
Just
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the
-p option
Just
Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm now testing app-backup/boxbackup,
which seems good so far.
Please report your findings on the list! I'm not all too happy about my
current solution (rdiff-backup locally to a filesystem over dmcrypt,
loopback-mounted from a file, followed by an rsync over ssh to a
At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:37:52 -0400,
Chris Walters wrote:
I also use dar, but I don't bother with gpg. I use the '-K:' option of dar,
which provides passphrase protected blowfish protection. I suppose I could
use
gpg, as well, with AES256 or IDEA, but that would be overkill, I think, since
· Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Because you didn't read the elog messages.
it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid.
It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jan Seeger wrote:
| At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:37:52 -0400,
| Chris Walters wrote:
snip
| This sounds like a feasible solution, I will try it out. Thanks for
| the idea, Florian and Chris.
|
| I'm just wondering what the dar64 and dar32 useflags do...
Michael Schmarck schrieb:
· Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Because you didn't read the elog messages.
it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid.
It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:45:53 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote:
It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I
upgraded.
Armin has at least one machine and I've got 2 were this happened and
there are reports in the forum discussion thread reg. disappearance
of
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:57:47 +0200, Remy Blank wrote:
I'm now testing app-backup/boxbackup,
which seems good so far.
Please report your findings on the list! I'm not all too happy about my
current solution (rdiff-backup locally to a filesystem over dmcrypt,
loopback-mounted from a
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselay
out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2r2=1.3
oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
fsck runs with the -p option. -p
Here's a useful discussioin:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-254197-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-findcruft-start-50.html
--- Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know where the message
you have cruft in /proc remove it
comes from and what to do about it.
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselay
out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2r2=1.3
oh great, changes without a rX bump. I hate that.
No need for a rev bump here i guess! Anybody who
maxim wexler schrieb:
Here's a useful discussioin:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-254197-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-findcruft-start-50.html
--- Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know where the message
you have cruft in /proc remove it
comes from and
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:20 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Second: I don't think this is normal filesystem cruft like which is
discussed in the forum. The proc (proc - Process information
pseudo-filesystem) filesystem contains information about the state of
your system and the running
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:20 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Second: I don't think this is normal filesystem cruft like which is
discussed in the forum. The proc (proc - Process information
pseudo-filesystem) filesystem contains information about the state of
your
First: Don't top post!
Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see
at a glance which is the original and which the reply.
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
That's not free, that's M$ stuff, but I'd suggest you to take a look,
just take a look, at Segoe UI fonts.
I Don't know any free fonts comparable to it, but there's a story of
some guy who charged M$ for using his font as base for Segoe... I
don't know if that font is free, or even if it exists,
maxim wexler schrieb:
First: Don't top post!
Big whoop! The two posts are tiny -- it's easy to see
at a glance which is the original and which the reply.
Irrelevant! I answered you below, what happens when you answer again on
the top, and so on?
Answer5
Answer3
Answer1
Question
Answer2
Justin schrieb:
to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2?
Openrc requires sys-fs/udev-118-r2. As far as i know udev-120 is going
to be stabilized with openrc/baselayout-2 which I use too. Didn't have
any problems so far!
Regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
080417 Liviu Andronic wrote:
Although perfectly aware that this is a much subjective business, ...
Very much so !
... I am looking for best fonts
and would much appreciate your sharing of personal choices.
I like New Century Schoolbook for variable spacing,
with URW Palladio as a good
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:11 -0500, Richard Marzan wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
I tried googling around but no helpful content so far. I have a
laptop with built-in sound. It uses the HDA_intel kernel module. My
problem is that I can't silence the
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/base
lay out-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2r2=1.3
oh great, changes without a rX bump. I
On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Also this package is in ~arch and left package.mask recently, so it is
under testing and you have to expect problems!
problems, yes. The nuking of important config files and non-boot: no.
That is complety inacceptable for something that
I assume I'll have to download some gentoo system binaries. Can
someone point me to what I need?
Here's what happened. I did a regular emerge --sync and then tried
an update. There seemed to be a circular blockage involving both
coreutils and mktemp. As I've done in similar situations in
what did you unmerge?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume I'll have to download some gentoo system binaries. Can
someone point me to what I need?
Here's what happened. I did a regular emerge --sync and then tried
an update. There seemed to be a
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 09:48:15PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote about his
incredible saga of thud and blunder.
Sorry about the panic post. I got flustered and posted right away,
when I should've checked for similar threads. Problem solved as per
the suggestions in the other threads. Reminder to
quoth the Gustavo Campos:
That's not free, that's M$ stuff, but I'd suggest you to take a look,
just take a look, at Segoe UI fonts.
Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so..
Besides, the OP mentioned no requirement that the font must be 'free'.
I was simply stating what I
Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so..
Is Segoe UI really in Portage? At the last time I emerged corefonts it
wasn't present, so I had to find it on the web =)
And by free, I meant the really free free, you know =)
I was simply stating what I use because I think it
quoth the Gustavo Campos:
Well, it's included in portage, and I paid $0 for it so..
Is Segoe UI really in Portage? At the last time I emerged corefonts it
wasn't present, so I had to find it on the web =)
I dunno, I was talking about the Vera Sans. I was going to look for Segoe
later.
Daniel Pielmeier schrieb:
Justin schrieb:
to which udev version should be upgraded for the baselayout2?
Openrc requires sys-fs/udev-118-r2. As far as i know udev-120 is
going to be stabilized with openrc/baselayout-2 which I use too.
Didn't have any problems so far!
Regards,
Daniel
62 matches
Mail list logo
