Re: [gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Rasmus.thomsen schrieb am So., 30. Apr. 2017, 12:19: > Hello, > > it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, > however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a > package.env file with entries for those packages (like

[gentoo-user] Can not compile arduino sketch after GCC upgrade

After upgrading GCC to 5.4.0 (from 4.9.3) I can no longer compile my sketches. At the end of the compile phase a get the following linker error: avr-gcc -Os -Wl,--gc-sections -mmcu=atmega32u4 -o /tmp/build881550966608502477.tmp/Blinky.cpp.elf /tmp/build881550966608502477.tmp/Blinky.cpp.o

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On 04/30/2017 05:25 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: So much for that wiki entry. BTW, I ended up putting... sys-devel/gcc graphite ...in package.use. The "graphite" USE flag means something entirely different for harfbuzz, i.e. build against media-libs/harfbuzz against media-gfx/graphite2 Btw, I

[gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Hi, before I do a lot of reconfiguring, recompiling and finally do the same thing again in the opposite direction: What are the experiences to replace gcc with clang for either only userland tools or the whole system (with haveing gcc as fallback)? Is it worth the effort? What are the benefits

Re: [gentoo-user] clang <<==>> gcc ?

Hello, it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a package.env file with entries for those packages (like described on clang's wiki entry). Clang usually compiles faster than GCC does, but produces

[gentoo-user] Voice synthesizers? (not neccessarily TTS!)

Hi, I am looking for a (not neccessarily GENTOO) software, whith which it is possible to synthesize the human voice (male / female). It does not neccessarily need to be a TTS (I tried some) -- but the voice needs easily to be tuned in the sense of pitch and sound. Suppose you want a synthetic

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:18:42 PM CEST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 04/30/2017 05:25 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > So much for that wiki entry. BTW, I ended up putting... > > > > sys-devel/gcc graphite > > > > ...in package.use. The "graphite" USE flag means something entirely > > different

Re: [gentoo-user] How to get memtest onto a USB drive

On Sunday 30 Apr 2017 01:33:29 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 29 Apr 2017 08:57:35 Rasmus Thomsen wrote: > > Hello, > > > > actually had that screen happening to me too, but my hardware was fine. > > Could you try emerging the latest (unstable) memtest86+ package? > > Symlinking should work

Re: [gentoo-user] How to get memtest onto a USB drive

On 04/29/2017 05:33 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 29 Apr 2017 08:57:35 Rasmus Thomsen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> actually had that screen happening to me too, but my hardware was fine. >> Could you try emerging the latest (unstable) memtest86+ package? >> Symlinking should work with that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

Hi, Graphite *can* improve the performance of some packages, but might worsen the performance of others. You might want to read through this thread: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1052716-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html Personally, I enable it on a per package basis,

[gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:33:05 -0700 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > > It allows portage to properly shut down remaining processes from > > ebuild build phases by knowing exactly which processes have been > > spawn in the compile phase, and it allows openrc to better manage > > the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:09:16PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote > On 04/30/2017 05:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:18:42 PM CEST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> > >> Btw, I don't think that USE flag is useful for anything, unless you put > >> the graphite optimization

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 04/30/2017 08:33 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: >>> >>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 >>> schrieb Jorge Almeida :

[gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On 04/30/2017 08:33 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 schrieb Jorge Almeida : Well, it says "should be" enabled. It's not a requirement. You may not use some of htop's

Re: [gentoo-user] How to get memtest onto a USB drive

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 30 Apr 2017 15:05:41 Mick wrote: >> On Sunday 30 Apr 2017 01:33:29 Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> Here's a picture of the BIOS screen. This hardware is kaput. >> It may not be. > You're right - it wasn't. > >> Try re-seating the HDMI/DVI/VGA? cable between the PC and

[gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:36:03 -0700 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikos Chantziaras > wrote: > > On 04/30/2017 08:33 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:36:03 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : >> The warnings don't bother me that much, I just feel they are Bad >> Policy. Enabling cgroups would add unnecessary complexity to the >>

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On 04/30/2017 05:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:18:42 PM CEST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 04/30/2017 05:25 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: So much for that wiki entry. BTW, I ended up putting... sys-devel/gcc graphite ...in package.use. The "graphite" USE flag means

[gentoo-user] freetype-2.7 USE flags

I understand that freetype-2.7 enabled by default the code that emulates the so called ClearType technique on Windows (a.k.a. blurry fonts). In older versions that code was turned on with the "infinality" USE flag. "infinality" is still there but now there is also a new "cleartype_hinting" flag.

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On 04/30/2017 10:36 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:09:16PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote On 04/30/2017 05:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: On Sunday, April 30, 2017 2:18:42 PM CEST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Btw, I don't think that USE flag is useful for anything, unless you put

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc with graphite flag?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 11:34:44PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote > On 04/30/2017 10:36 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > For Pale Moon, the developers want... > > > > -floop-parallelize-all -fpredictive-commoning -ftree-loop-distribution > > -ftree-vectorize > > > > I follow those specs when

[gentoo-user] Re: How to get rid of sys-fs/static-dev, or do I really need it?

Am Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:29:51 +0100 schrieb Neil Bothwick : > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:30:07 +0200, wabe wrote: > > > > Do you have virtual/udev installed? That should be enough to keep > > > virtual/dev-manager happy. > > > > Thanks for your answer. virtual/udev is already

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:30:03 +0100 schrieb lee : > Danny YUE writes: > > > On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement > >> which is at least as good as FTP? >

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 20:02:57 +0100 schrieb lee : > Alan McKinnon writes: > > > On 25/04/2017 16:29, lee wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement > >> which is at least as good as FTP? > >>

[gentoo-user] Re: Pseudo first impressions

Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 00:56:40 -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 : > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Kai Krakow > wrote: > > Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 14:39:13 + > > schrieb Alan Mackenzie : > > > >> For a start, I could barely read parts of it, which were

[gentoo-user] Re: replacement for ftp?

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:02:51 -0400 schrieb "Walter Dnes" : > Then there's always "sneakernet". To quote Andrew Tanenbaum from > 1981 > > > Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes > > hurtling down the highway. Hehe, with the improvements in

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild: package specific CFLAGS

Am Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:14:10 -0400 schrieb John Covici : > On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:10:42 -0400, > Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > > I'm trying to create an ebuild of a crufty old program that needs > > -fgnu89-inline in compiler flags to have any chance of building. > > > >

[gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

Why? emerging htop yields this message: * CONFIG_CGROUPS: is not set when it should be. * Please check to make sure these options are set correctly. * Failure to do so may cause unexpected problems. Gee, I can use top without cgroups support. I thought I might use htop as well. Anyone

Re: [gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

Hi, it's possible to use htop without the cgroup config in your kernel, but htop is able to display cgroups (which it obviously isn't able to if those aren't enabled in the kernel), so emerge throws this warning. If you don't want to display your cgroups in htop you don't need to change

[gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 schrieb Jorge Almeida : > Why? > > emerging htop yields this message: > * CONFIG_CGROUPS: is not set when it should be. > * Please check to make sure these options are set correctly. > * Failure to do so may cause unexpected

Re: [gentoo-user] replacement for ftp?

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:29:18 +0100 lee wrote: > > Hi, > > since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement > which is at least as good as FTP? I fail to see why FTP needs to be replaced: it works, it is supported, it is secure when used with care, it is damn fast. Best

Re: [gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Rasmus wrote: > Hi, > > it's possible to use htop without the cgroup config in your kernel, but htop > is able to display cgroups (which it obviously isn't able to if those aren't > enabled in the kernel), so emerge throws this

[gentoo-user] Re: ebuild: package specific CFLAGS

On 04/28/2017 10:10 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I'm trying to create an ebuild of a crufty old program that needs > -fgnu89-inline in compiler flags to have any chance of building. > > What's the way to do that in an ebuild? I could have something like > > src_configure() { > econf

Re: [gentoo-user] Voice synthesizers? (not neccessarily TTS!)

tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a (not neccessarily GENTOO) software, whith which > it is possible to synthesize the human voice (male / female). > > It does not neccessarily need to be a TTS (I tried some) -- but the > voice needs easily to be tuned in the sense of pitch and

Re: [gentoo-user] Voice synthesizers? (not neccessarily TTS!)

wabe wrote: > tu...@posteo.de wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a (not neccessarily GENTOO) software, whith which > > it is possible to synthesize the human voice (male / female). > > > > It does not neccessarily need to be a TTS (I tried some) -- but the > > voice

Re: [gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

I think that it's meant to "touch a chord", to make sure that you have the necessary kernel configs enabled before you report a bug because something doesn't work Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 30 Apr 2017, 19:04, Jorge Almeida wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida : > > Well, it says "should be" enabled. It's not a requirement. You may not > use some of htop's features like proper process grouping.

Re: [gentoo-user] How to get memtest onto a USB drive

On Sunday 30 Apr 2017 15:05:41 Mick wrote: > On Sunday 30 Apr 2017 01:33:29 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Here's a picture of the BIOS screen. This hardware is kaput. > > It may not be. You're right - it wasn't. > Try re-seating the HDMI/DVI/VGA? cable between the PC and the monitor with > the PC