Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Recent change in python - some packages are not happy

2018-06-24 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 16:14:42 CEST schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 24/06/18 12:35, Marc Joliet wrote: > > See bug #656406. If you don't care for going back (like me), you can do > > the following (make.conf isn't enough because apparently that overrides, > > e.g., asciidoc being forced to

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread tuxic
On 06/24 11:12, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 06/24/18 10:21, Dale wrote: > > Plus it does say to include that info.  If it wasn't provided, it would > > likely be asked for at some point unless someone has ran into that > > specific problem and can recognize it with nothing but the bare info.  > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Dale
zless wrote: > În ziua de duminică, 24 iunie 2018, la 11:55:52 EEST, Zoltán Kócsi a scris: >> Hi, >> >>> Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support >>> according to emerge ;) >> Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. >> >> As a rough guess, the

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Daniel Frey
On 06/24/18 10:21, Dale wrote: > Plus it does say to include that info.  If it wasn't provided, it would > likely be asked for at some point unless someone has ran into that > specific problem and can recognize it with nothing but the bare info.  > > My email program downloaded the whole thing

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > Hi, > > I think I am in trouble here...especially after reading the news > item... > > After the daily sunc routine, a new news items was announced which > I read. > > It saus, that the update to mpfr-4 could possibly break

Re: [gentoo-user] Recent change in python - some packages are not happy

2018-06-24 Thread Mick
On Saturday, 23 June 2018 12:35:32 BST you wrote: > On Saturday, 23 June 2018 11:09:10 BST Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 10:38:35AM +0100, Mick wrote: > > > On Saturday, 23 June 2018 10:30:09 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > > On 23 June 2018 10:14:31 BST, Mick wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Recent change in python - some packages are not happy

2018-06-24 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 11:10:48 CEST schrieb Mick: [snip] > Is the default python target determined by the profile and does this > override choices through eselect? > > Should 'eselect python update' set 3.6 as the default when emerge seems to > be determined to use 3.5? > > # eselect python

Re: [gentoo-user] Recent change in python - some packages are not happy

2018-06-24 Thread Mick
On Sunday, 24 June 2018 10:35:37 BST Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 11:10:48 CEST schrieb Mick: > [snip] > > > Is the default python target determined by the profile and does this > > override choices through eselect? > > > > Should 'eselect python update' set 3.6 as the default

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Zoltán Kócsi
Hi, > Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support > according to emerge ;) Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. As a rough guess, the Gentoo list probably has at least 5 thousand different subscribers, so your simple email generated some 45GB

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread tuxic
On 06/24 07:01, Philip Webb wrote: > 180624 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: > >> The bad news: mpfr-4 was installed after a successful compilation > >> and gcc failed to compile. > > This was a collective thinko of the toolchain team.

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Philip Webb
180624 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 24. Juni 2018, 09:01:53 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de: >> The bad news: mpfr-4 was installed after a successful compilation >> and gcc failed to compile. > This was a collective thinko of the toolchain team. > The news item should never have been shown

[gentoo-user] warning (different signature type) when doing ssh

2018-06-24 Thread allan gottlieb
I have two laptops call them A and B both running gentoo. I recently did on each an emerge --sync after a long absence. The large emerge --update @world's finally finished on each machine. One new behavior is that If I use the console to log into A and then ssh to B, I get warning: agent

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread zless
În ziua de duminică, 24 iunie 2018, la 11:55:52 EEST, Zoltán Kócsi a scris: > Hi, > > > Here are the outputs, which I should include if I need support > > according to emerge ;) > > Still, if you didn't attach 9MB worth of stuff, that'd be appreciated. > > As a rough guess, the Gentoo list

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc failed to compile, mpfr-4 compiled successfully...

2018-06-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:28 PM wrote: > > Since the unstable packages of today are the stable packages of > tommorrow one needs to bite the bullet (and hopefully this sentence > is not complete nonsense...I am no native speaker...not at all!) > Presumably if you're running stable on a host you

[gentoo-user] Re: Recent change in python - some packages are not happy

2018-06-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/06/18 12:35, Marc Joliet wrote: See bug #656406. If you don't care for going back (like me), you can do the following (make.conf isn't enough because apparently that overrides, e.g., asciidoc being forced to PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7"): % cat /etc/portage/profile/make.defaults