Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Am 18.02.2012 17:57, schrieb Neil Bothwick: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Incidentally, the full output from genlop -t shows a steady decrease in build times as version numbers increase. It looks like optimisation of the old OOo code is ongoing. for reference: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz # genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Mon Feb 20 12:20:57 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 44 minutes and 54 seconds. It was my first build of libreoffice, I used the binary version before. 8 gigs of RAM dedicated to PORTAGE_TMPDIR, mounted as tmpfs. Stefan
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
on 02/18/2012 06:57 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil?
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. -- Neil Bothwick I heard someone tried the monkeys-on-typewriters bit trying for the plays of W. Shakespeare but all they got was the collected works of Francis Bacon signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that fast. :-( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM. Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds. Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo- charged fs? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:26:57 +, Mick wrote: * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that fast. :-( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM. Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds. Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo- charged fs? Just plain old ext2. Laptops tend to have slower IO whereas I'm using RAID1 on SATA3 hardware. Plus it is a newer CPU. -- Neil Bothwick Windows '96 artificial intelligence: Unable to FORMAT A: Having a go at C: signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick: On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that fast. :-( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM. Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds. Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo- charged fs? IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on a 7200rpm disk) for me : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds. With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 12:57:51 Meik Frischke wrote: Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick: On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that fast. :-( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM. Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds. Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo- charged fs? IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on a 7200rpm disk) for me : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds. With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though... My /var partition is on ext4. My CPU is admittedly slower, but even so I wouldn't think that it would take more than _twice_ as long as Neil's. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
I would be curious to see the results of compiling libreoffice with PORTAGE_TMPDIR on btrfs with compress=lzo. On Feb 19, 2012 9:37 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 12:57:51 Meik Frischke wrote: Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2012, 12:26:57 schrieb Mick: On Sunday 19 Feb 2012 11:45:25 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:58:35 +0200, Thanasis wrote: [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Impressive. What's your hardware configuration, Neil? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16GB RAM. Hmm ... I've got a 1st generation i7 on my laptop and it is no-where near that fast. :-( Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz with 4G RAM. Sun Jan 29 21:47:46 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 34 minutes and 43 seconds. Is it just down to the CPU or are you running /var/tmp/portage on some turbo- charged fs? IO does really slow down the compilation progress a lot. Having PORTAGE_TMPDIR on tmpfs saves about half an hour (compared to reiserfs on a 7200rpm disk) for me : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz Thu Feb 16 17:42:35 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 39 seconds. With 4GB Ram thats not an option for you though... My /var partition is on ext4. My CPU is admittedly slower, but even so I wouldn't think that it would take more than _twice_ as long as Neil's. -- Regards, Mick
[gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Hi all, I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. Any idea ? Thank you, Cheers, -- Jacques
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jacques Montier jmont...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. Any idea ? Thank you, Cheers, -- Jacques It didn't work for me as well :| I ended up compiling libreoffice-3.5 (took about 4h). -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Your lack of organisation does not represent an emergency in my world. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Your lack of organisation does not represent an emergency in my world. Well, I don't have an i7. I'm on a Dual Core 2 Ghz E2180. Yes really that old. -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling Openoffice... Let's try now...;-) Thanks, Cheers, -- Jacques
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Jacques Montier wrote: Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling Openoffice... Let's try now...;-) Thanks, Cheers, -- Jacques Chew on this one. This is for my old rig: Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1 merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds. I just love updating that old thing. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit : Jacques Montier wrote: Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling Openoffice... Let's try now...;-) Thanks, Cheers, -- Jacques Chew on this one. This is for my old rig: Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1 merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds. I just love updating that old thing. lol Dale :-) :-) Yes, It was worth changing a use flag then :-) -- Jacques
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Jacques Montier wrote: Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit : Jacques Montier wrote: Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling Openoffice... Let's try now...;-) Thanks, Cheers, -- Jacques Chew on this one. This is for my old rig: Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1 merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds. I just love updating that old thing. lol Dale :-) :-) Yes, It was worth changing a use flag then :-) -- Jacques Funny thing is, I updated that a week or so ago. It took 3 tries to get LOo to compile and finish. Is it just me or do they always seem to fail right at the end? ROLF Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:54:14 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Like this? # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2720QM CPU @ 2.20GHz # genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Sun Jan 15 20:27:12 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.99.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 42 seconds. Thu Jan 19 01:28:48 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.1 merge time: 58 minutes and 38 seconds. Fri Feb 17 10:21:57 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 8 seconds. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Le 18/02/2012 15:42, Alan McKinnon a écrit : On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:54:14 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Like this? # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2720QM CPU @ 2.20GHz # genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Sun Jan 15 20:27:12 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.99.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 42 seconds. Thu Jan 19 01:28:48 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.1 merge time: 58 minutes and 38 seconds. Fri Feb 17 10:21:57 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 8 seconds. Here it is... processor: 7 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 6 model: 26 model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz stepping: 5 microcode: 0xf cpu MHz: 3067.000 cache size: 8192 KB genlop -t app-office/libreoffice Sat Feb 18 16:10:44 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.4.5.2 merge time: 1 hour, 22 minutes and 35 seconds. And it works fine ! Neil, it was a very good idea ! :-) Thanks, -- Jacques
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:31:45 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. I get instruction not permitted. So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) Well, I don't have an i7. I'm on a Dual Core 2 Ghz E2180. Yes really that old. Sorry, I misread the ie7 as i7. I'd still use the source build, as long as it could be completed either overnight or while you are out as work. -- Neil Bothwick An expert is nothing more than an ordinary person away from home. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:42:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if Like this? # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 42 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2720QM CPU @ 2.20GHz # genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Fri Feb 17 10:21:57 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 50 minutes and 8 seconds. OK, if you want to play genlop Top Trumps [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Incidentally, the full output from genlop -t shows a steady decrease in build times as version numbers increase. It looks like optimisation of the old OOo code is ongoing. -- Neil Bothwick Q: Why is top-posting evil? A: backwards read don't humans because signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:57:17 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: OK, if you want to play genlop Top Trumps [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice * app-office/libreoffice Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds. Incidentally, the full output from genlop -t shows a steady decrease in build times as version numbers increase. It looks like optimisation of the old OOo code is ongoing. Actually I would ascribe it more to the libreoffice ebuild maintainers getting rid of insane amounts of bundled crap in the OOo codebase and instead building against the versions already in @world. The ebuild maintainer was quite active on Gentoo's planet a few months back, giving feedback to users and asking for testers. The amount of progress being made in unbundling OOo's shit was quite impressive (to put it mildly) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
