Holly Bostick wrote:
[big snip]
Holly
Well said.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:01:21AM -0700, Bob Sanders wrote
Too bad neither work 100%. Neither will produce -
# Modelines for 1600SW MultiLink
ModeLine 512x384 19.392 512 528 592 640 384 385 388 404
ModeLine 512x384
On Monday 04 July 2005 00:03, Bob Sanders wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:31:42 +0100
Tim Igoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe if Linux becomes more mainstream or used in offices more then
perhaps they might improve the efforts towards the Linux drivers.
Here is why ATI won't become much
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 00:13:14 +0200, Luigi Pinna wrote:
Ok, in this case a question: which other cards support a good 3D?
If I don't buy ATI or NVIDEA, but other one Can I use UT2004? I
need 3D only to play... But I don't want to have a expensive card...
And ATI and NVIDEA start to 50
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:46:43 +0200
Benjamin Fritzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Ati 9600 in my Inspiron works perfectly in 16:10 with the Ati-drivers.
I doubt that. Maybe at 16x9 - 1600 x 900, but not 1600 x 1024. Or perahps
Dell paid ATI to support that one model of display. Regardless
On Monday 04 July 2005 15:29, Bob Sanders wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:46:43 +0200
Benjamin Fritzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Ati 9600 in my Inspiron works perfectly in 16:10 with the Ati-drivers.
I doubt that. Maybe at 16x9 - 1600 x 900, but not 1600 x 1024. Or perahps
Dell paid ATI
On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:31:42 +0100
Tim Igoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe if Linux becomes more mainstream or used in offices more then
perhaps they might improve the efforts towards the Linux drivers.
Here is why ATI won't become much better over time - most
of their developers don't
Alle 00:03, lunedì 04 luglio 2005, Bob Sanders ha scritto:
[...]
I really tried to not pre-judge them and tried various options using
their cards - Xorg, flgrx, and even went third party - Xig. Simply
put - I'll not be buying any more ATI cards.
Bob
Ok, in this case a question: which other
On Monday 04 July 2005 00:13, Luigi Pinna wrote:
Ok, in this case a question: which other cards support a good 3D?
If I don't buy ATI or NVIDEA, but other one Can I use UT2004? I need
3D only to play... But I don't want to have a expensive card... And ATI
and NVIDEA start to 50 €
Yeah, let me echo that.
If you run Linux, and you want to play games, and you want a brand new
video card, get an nVidia. It's that simple.
Justin
On 7/3/05, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 July 2005 00:13, Luigi Pinna wrote:
Ok, in this case a question: which
* On Saturday 02 July 2005 05:10, Justin Hart wrote:
Whooa. I didn't mean to stir a hornet's nest.
It was a bit late last night, so I felt like having to rant about something.
From a pure customers view, I'd agree with your conclusions. The hornets are
now well rested. My apologies. ;-)
On Saturday 02 July 2005 05:10, Justin Hart wrote:
I'm sure that ATI will come through, or, whatever. Just, well, if you
get one RIGHT NOW, NEW, you'll be dissapointed.
Well, ATI driver sucked 10 years ago, they suck today... I don't think that
ATI is able to make any decent drivers EVER.
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Saturday 02 July 2005 05:10, Justin Hart wrote:
I'm sure that ATI will come through, or, whatever. Just, well, if you
get one RIGHT NOW, NEW, you'll be dissapointed.
Well, ATI driver sucked 10 years ago, they suck today... I don't think that
ATI is
No prob.
On 7/2/05, Jens Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* On Saturday 02 July 2005 05:10, Justin Hart wrote:
Whooa. I didn't mean to stir a hornet's nest.
It was a bit late last night, so I felt like having to rant about something.
From a pure customers view, I'd agree with your
* On Friday 01 July 2005 01:49, Justin Hart wrote:
Buying an ATI card for a Linux box is not a good decision. Go with
nVidia, at least their drivers work. I've thought of buying an nVidia
card for this notebook for months because, frankly, ATI hasn't been
taking care of the matter, and won't
Jens Mayer wrote:
* On Friday 01 July 2005 20:57, Justin Hart wrote:
To counter this argument, I would point out that I don't normally
purchase used 3D acceleration hardware, and that by the time these
cards are old they will also be obsolete, meaning that you will
have sunk a good amount of
I, humbly, must disagree.
ATI's drivers have been far behind. The Radeon drivers, rather than
the fglrx ones, fall short on many fronts. The ATI fglrx drivers,
have been behind since I got this card. You still can't run composite
and dri together.
Buying an ATI card for a Linux box is not a
Well, I cannot turn on composite extension. Right. I'm sure that very early
ATI will improve linux's graphical drivers, as they're doing right now.
They're developing better drivers, so there's no reason about thinking that
composite won't be enabled for ATI graphics card.
Well, I liked TOO
Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Well, I cannot turn on composite extension. Right. I'm sure that very early
ATI will improve linux's graphical drivers, as they're doing right now.
They're developing better drivers, so there's no reason about thinking that
composite won't be enabled for ATI
El Jueves 30 Junio 2005 00:20, XXOmega21XX escribió:
--- Benjamin Fritzsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 January 2005 03:19, Rui Silva wrote:
hello ppl
i'm thinking on buying a new notebook computer.
the model i'm interested has a ATI 9700 128Mb
graphic card. R300
On Friday 28 January 2005 03:19, Rui Silva wrote:
hello ppl
i'm thinking on buying a new notebook computer.
the model i'm interested has a ATI 9700 128Mb graphic card. R300 based
How are the drivers for this graphic card??
Is ATI LInux driver good enough?? i'm not going to play games.
21 matches
Mail list logo
