Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-29 Thread R0b0t1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Almeida  wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1  wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida  wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html
>> ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is
>> probably reasonable to assume that a HD 630 device is supported.
>>
>
> OTOH, the gentoo WiKi https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Intel seems to
> imply that the commitment of Intel with Linux may be somewhat
> colder...
>
>>
>> There are Intel HD devices, but there are also Iris devices. Per
>> marketing materials I found the Iris line is intended to be
>> distributed with higher-end computers for "professional" use. Do Iris
>> and HD devices actually differ in driver support or is it mostly the
>> name that shows up in lspci or Window's device manager that differs?
>
> First time I read about it. Wikipedia
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics has a few
> tables suggesting Iris is higher end stuff. I don't know about kernel
> support.
>>
>

They seem to be shipped with very high-end mobile devices (elitebooks,
dell XPS line, Microsoft's Surface) that do not have a discrete GPU.
>From what I can tell it may be hardware differences that don't
propagate up to the driver level, but there seems to be no info on it.
I had been assuming they were compatible but had no proof.



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-29 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1  wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida  wrote:

>
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html
> ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is
> probably reasonable to assume that a HD 630 device is supported.
>

OTOH, the gentoo WiKi https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Intel seems to
imply that the commitment of Intel with Linux may be somewhat
colder...

>
> There are Intel HD devices, but there are also Iris devices. Per
> marketing materials I found the Iris line is intended to be
> distributed with higher-end computers for "professional" use. Do Iris
> and HD devices actually differ in driver support or is it mostly the
> name that shows up in lspci or Window's device manager that differs?

First time I read about it. Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics has a few
tables suggesting Iris is higher end stuff. I don't know about kernel
support.
>



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread Adam Carter
Agree with Joost that Intel is typically well supported in LInux. I have
Skylate (gen6) system which i got fairly soon after they were released and
had no issues setting it up using ~amd64. If you want to run amd64 instead
you might need to keyword the kernel and X stuff.

On firefox about:support, i have;
Multiprocess Windows 1/1 (Enabled by user)
and;
Features
CompositingOpenGL
Asynchronous Pan/Zoomwheel input enabled; touch input enabled
WebGL RendererX.Org -- Gallium 0.4 on AMD TONGA (DRM 3.8.0 /
4.9.6-gentoo-r1, LLVM 4.0.0)
WebGL2 RendererX.Org -- Gallium 0.4 on AMD TONGA (DRM 3.8.0 /
4.9.6-gentoo-r1, LLVM 4.0.0)
Hardware H264 DecodingNo
Audio Backendpulse
GPU #1
ActiveYes
DescriptionX.Org -- Gallium 0.4 on AMD TONGA (DRM 3.8.0 /
4.9.6-gentoo-r1, LLVM 4.0.0)
Vendor IDX.Org
Device IDGallium 0.4 on AMD TONGA (DRM 3.8.0 / 4.9.6-gentoo-r1, LLVM
4.0.0)
Driver Version3.0 Mesa 17.0.2
Diagnostics
AzureCanvasAccelerated0
AzureCanvasBackendskia
AzureContentBackendskia
AzureFallbackCanvasBackendnone
CairoUseXRender0
Decision Log
HW_COMPOSITING
blocked by default: Acceleration blocked by platform
force_enabled by user: Force-enabled by pref
OPENGL_COMPOSITING
force_enabled by user: Force-enabled by pref

I cant see any references to OMTC, but there are some layers.acceleration.*
and layers.offmainthreadcomposition.* configs, but they're all set to the
defaults.


Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread R0b0t1
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida  wrote:
> I'm resending this because "HD 630" is a title bound to elicit no
> response at all. Sorry, I was tired.
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jorge Almeida  wrote:
>> This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but
>> here it goes:
>>
>> I'm thinking of buying a recent Intel CPU (7th generation, in
>> saleslang), say an i5-7400, and it came to mind, not too late yet,
>> that the integrated GPU may not be supported in linux. I'm talking
>> about the latest kernels, not necessarily the gentoo-packaged one.
>> Anyone knows something about it? And if not supported, is it likely
>> that it will be sometime soon? I can use a spare Radeon card
>> meanwhile...
>>
>> (And, for someone who is not a gamer, is a 7th generation CPU worth it
>> at all, as opposed to a 6th generation one?)
>>
>> Any input is appreciated
>>
>> Jorge Almeida
>

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html
ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is
probably reasonable to assume that a HD 630 device is supported.

Hopefully that is the information you were after but I am still
somewhat confused and I think my confusion relevant to your original
question:

There are Intel HD devices, but there are also Iris devices. Per
marketing materials I found the Iris line is intended to be
distributed with higher-end computers for "professional" use. Do Iris
and HD devices actually differ in driver support or is it mostly the
name that shows up in lspci or Window's device manager that differs?



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 09:51:03 Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:19:00AM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote
> 
> > OK, I need no 3D, and I don't game (not even occasionally :)) And
> > I'm just an openbox user!
> > 
> > Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?
> > 
> > The gentoo WiKI has a page about this stuff. Reading now...
> 
>   Mozilla-specific info... if you run either Firefox or sea Monkey or
> Pale Moon web browser, include the line...
> 
> export MOZ_USE_OMTC=1
> 
> ...in .bashrc to get maximum hardware acceleration.  For detailed info
> about the program, go to "about:support", just like "about:config" and
> "about:buildconfig".

Adding MOZ_USE_OMTC=1 made no difference here.  Both before and after it 
reported:

 GPU Accelerated Windows0/1 Basic (OMTC) 
-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:19:00AM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote
>
> OK, I need no 3D, and I don't game (not even occasionally :)) And
> I'm just an openbox user!
> 
> Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?
> 
> The gentoo WiKI has a page about this stuff. Reading now...

  Mozilla-specific info... if you run either Firefox or sea Monkey or
Pale Moon web browser, include the line...

export MOZ_USE_OMTC=1

...in .bashrc to get maximum hardware acceleration.  For detailed info
about the program, go to "about:support", just like "about:config" and
"about:buildconfig".

-- 
Walter Dnes 
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, J. Roeleveld  wrote:
> On March 28, 2017 11:19:00 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida  
> wrote:

>>
>>Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?
>>
>
>
> If you just want 2D, then any GPU should work. Intel has very good support on 
> Linux.
>
> For desktop effect, the '3D' capabilities of the GPU are being used. Intel 
> GPUs can handle those without issues. Unless the gen7 version isn't in the 
> kernel yet, expect to have to wait. But I wouldn't expect to have to wait 
> very long. But I wouldn't go for a newer gen7 CPU just for the GPU if not 
> interested in 3D games.
>

Well, I suppose gen7 has advantages re power consumption and speed,
for uses other than 3D. For example, it supports faster RAM. I'm not
sure it's worth the price, though.

Thanks for the input.

Jorge



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread J. Roeleveld
On March 28, 2017 11:19:00 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida  
wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:02 AM, J. Roeleveld 
>wrote:
>> On March 28, 2017 10:39:22 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida
> wrote:
>

>
>>
>> My laptop uses the integrated GPU 95÷ of the time. For the occasional
>game I want to play, I can enable the NVidia chip.
>>
>> Support for Intel graphics is in the vanilla kernel, courtesy of
>Intel developers. With  6th generation i7, I can do most things. Only
>need the Nvidia chip for 3D games that need the higher performance.
>>
>> With just the Intel GPU, I can enable all the eye-candy that KDE has
>to offer and still have a responsive desktop. I don't use it all as it
>can make the interface unusable due to the actual effects.
>>
>OK, I need no 3D, and I don't game (not even occasionally :)) And I'm
>just an openbox user!
>
>Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?
>
>The gentoo WiKI has a page about this stuff. Reading now...
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Jorge

If you just want 2D, then any GPU should work. Intel has very good support on 
Linux.

For desktop effect, the '3D' capabilities of the GPU are being used. Intel GPUs 
can handle those without issues. Unless the gen7 version isn't in the kernel 
yet, expect to have to wait. But I wouldn't expect to have to wait very long. 
But I wouldn't go for a newer gen7 CPU just for the GPU if not interested in 3D 
games.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:02 AM, J. Roeleveld  wrote:
> On March 28, 2017 10:39:22 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida  
> wrote:

>>>

>
> My laptop uses the integrated GPU 95÷ of the time. For the occasional game I 
> want to play, I can enable the NVidia chip.
>
> Support for Intel graphics is in the vanilla kernel, courtesy of Intel 
> developers. With  6th generation i7, I can do most things. Only need the 
> Nvidia chip for 3D games that need the higher performance.
>
> With just the Intel GPU, I can enable all the eye-candy that KDE has to offer 
> and still have a responsive desktop. I don't use it all as it can make the 
> interface unusable due to the actual effects.
>
OK, I need no 3D, and I don't game (not even occasionally :)) And I'm
just an openbox user!

Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience?

The gentoo WiKI has a page about this stuff. Reading now...


Thanks

Jorge



Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

2017-03-28 Thread J. Roeleveld
On March 28, 2017 10:39:22 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida  
wrote:
>I'm resending this because "HD 630" is a title bound to elicit no
>response at all. Sorry, I was tired.
>
>On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jorge Almeida 
>wrote:
>> This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but
>> here it goes:
>>
>> I'm thinking of buying a recent Intel CPU (7th generation, in
>> saleslang), say an i5-7400, and it came to mind, not too late yet,
>> that the integrated GPU may not be supported in linux. I'm talking
>> about the latest kernels, not necessarily the gentoo-packaged one.
>> Anyone knows something about it? And if not supported, is it likely
>> that it will be sometime soon? I can use a spare Radeon card
>> meanwhile...
>>
>> (And, for someone who is not a gamer, is a 7th generation CPU worth
>it
>> at all, as opposed to a 6th generation one?)
>>
>> Any input is appreciated
>>
>> Jorge Almeida

My laptop uses the integrated GPU 95÷ of the time. For the occasional game I 
want to play, I can enable the NVidia chip.

Support for Intel graphics is in the vanilla kernel, courtesy of Intel 
developers. With  6th generation i7, I can do most things. Only need the Nvidia 
chip for 3D games that need the higher performance.

With just the Intel GPU, I can enable all the eye-candy that KDE has to offer 
and still have a responsive desktop. I don't use it all as it can make the 
interface unusable due to the actual effects.

--
Joost
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.