On 19/09/2021 14:06, Philip Webb wrote:
210919 antlists wrote:
On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
& resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
Until you
On 9/19/21 12:03 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 210918 cal wrote:
>>> (kde-frameworks/kglobalaccel-5.82.0-r1:5/5.82::gentoo, installed)
>>> USE="-debug -doc -nls -test" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
>>> (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
>> See in particular the last m
210919 antlists wrote:
> On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
>> Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
>> are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
>> & resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
> Until you hit my version of the problem,
> wh
On 19/09/2021 08:03, Philip Webb wrote:
Portage ought to be able to recognise when a set of pkgs
are creating destructive circular dependencies among themselves
& resolve the conflict by updating all of them together.
Until you hit my version of the problem, where if a is not there, b
crashes
210918 cal wrote:
>> (kde-frameworks/kglobalaccel-5.82.0-r1:5/5.82::gentoo, installed)
>> USE="-debug -doc -nls -test" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
>> (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
> See in particular the last message.
> I'm not sure what causes that messag
On Saturday, 18 September 2021 17.19.45 CEST Philip Webb wrote:
> Here is the whole command + output in gruesome detail :
>
> root:522 ~> !498
> PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_9" emerge -pv --backtrack=30 attica
> frameworkintegration kactivities kactivities-stats kcmutils kconfig
> kcoreaddons kcr
cal wrote:
>
> See in particular the last message. I'm not sure what causes that
> message in particular, but it seems like kglobalaccel is causing the
> problem by pulling in a bunch of 5.82.0 deps causing a slot conflict.
>
> cal
>
>
Just a shot in the dark, could some KDE packages have crept
On 9/18/21 2:59 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot co
On 9/18/21 8:19 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
> 210918 Jack wrote:
>> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>>
>>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot h
210918 Jack wrote:
> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>
>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled
>> !!! into the depend
On 9/18/21 09:08, Philip Webb wrote:
210918 J.O. Aho wrote:
On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulle
210918 J.O. Aho wrote:
> On 18/09/2021 12.10, Philip Webb wrote:
>> There is an update available for KDE Frameworks.
>> When I try to perform it, I get a conflict statement which begins
>>
>>!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
>> pulled
>>!!! into the dep
210126 Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 07:52:53 GMT Philip Webb wrote:
>> I manhandled a huge update of Qt + KDE last weekend
>> & am now using Qt-5.15.2 Frameworks-5.77.0 Plasma-5.20.5 .
>> The digital clock has disappeared from the panel.
> Some packages have been updated again to
On Tuesday, 26 January 2021 07:52:53 GMT Philip Webb wrote:
> I manhandled a huge update of Qt + KDE last weekend
> & am now using Qt-5.15.2 Frameworks-5.77.0 Plasma-5.20.5 .
> It was necessary to unmerge the whole of Qt & remerge it
> & ditto part of Frameworks : otherwise there were dependency
On 2 June 2011 15:32, Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:
>
> - Mail Original -
> De: "Alain DIDIERJEAN"
[snip...]
> Hope I can get some help
> - Mail Original - ends here
>
> SOLVED, after unmerging then re-emerging a little more than 300 packages.
> Compile took the whole night. A heavy t
- Mail Original -
De: "Alain DIDIERJEAN"
À: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Envoyé: Lundi 30 Mai 2011 18h45:17 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome
/ Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: [gentoo-user] kde update
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
A simple "emerge -uD world" gives:
[ebuil
Alan McKinnon wrote:
So that's what you look like :-) I had a ... very different ... mental
picture (also a complete fiction).
There's no public photos on your page though :-(
And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile pic?
Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on the
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 00:30:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile
> pic? Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on the Thames.
A good deal less elegant though :)
--
Rgds
Peter
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:35 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> >>> It appears I was wrong after all.
> >>>
> >>> Manners dictates that apologies
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
It appears I was wrong after all.
Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order.
Sorry Dale.
No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be
1
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> > It appears I was wrong after all.
> >
> > Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order.
> >
> > Sorry Dale.
> >
> >
>
> No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be
>
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did
opine thusly:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I f
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did
opine thusly:
> tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
> > Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
> > the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
> > k
Nils Larsson wrote:
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system
packages bei
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:00 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht
> > did
> >
> > opine thusly:
> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> On
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale:
> Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in
> the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge
> kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system
> packages being removed. It may
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
wrote:
Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did
opine thusly:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
> >
> > I find that it is e
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
> wrote:
>> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
>
> I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
> the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like tha
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN
wrote:
> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge
the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.
Mick wrote:
On Monday 30 May 2011 20:02:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
the latest qt was installed and the
On Monday 30 May 2011 20:02:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
> > and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
> > the latest qt was installed and then kde4.6.
>
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:44 +0100, Mick wrote:
> Don't panic! What I did was to progressively uninstall the blockers
> and then run emerge -uaDv world. Eventually there were no blockers,
> the latest qt was installed and then kde4.6.
If the blockers are marked with a lower case b, portage will
On Monday 30 May 2011 17:45:17 Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:
> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6
> A simple "emerge -uD world" gives:
>
> [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.7.2-r1 [4.6.3-r1] USE="-jit%
> -private-headers%" [ebuild U ] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.7.2 [4.6.3-r2]
> [blocks b ] blocking
34 matches
Mail list logo
