: geoengineering@googlegroups.com, marty hoffert marty.hoff...@nyu.edu,
andrew lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:22:01 PM
Subject: RE: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Sorry, premature send again….
“ Finally
...@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 3:14 PM
To: Stuart Strand
Cc: geoengineering@googlegroups.com; marty hoffert; andrew lockley
Subject: Re: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Stuart etal:
Thanks for your response and apologies
Sorry, premature send again….
“Finally, I goofed in stating…” should be:
I goofed in stating a saturation level for biochar of 50 kg/ha. Mea culpa, I
meant 50 Mg biochar C/ha (only off by 1000x!). My reference for this rate is
Chan et al., Australian Jour. Soil Research 2007, 45:629. I
Group; James Rhodes; Bob Williams; Charlie
Forsberg
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
Dear all:
I have been following the biomass discussion with interest.
I like Stuart Strands' list, but something seems to be left out. The problem
t/episode.cfm?id=can-charcoal-slow-climate-change-an-10-08-08
---
Stuart Strand wrote:
Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center,
Washington DC
Thanks
Bill.
Bill,
I
will try to follow-up on these interesting proposed methods
to inject energy and
e/mg20727781.600-think-or-swim-can-we-hold-back-the-oceans.html?full=true
[4]
http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=can-charcoal-slow-climate-change-an-10-08-08
---
Stuart Strand wrote:
Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-1
Hoffert
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 6:11 AM
*To:* ke...@ucalgary.ca
*Cc:* z...@atmos.umd.edu; geoengineering@googlegroups.com; James Rhodes
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to burn
sequestration workshop Sep 9-10,
Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to
burn depends
on details like whether you can burn the biomass AND bury its CO2, and
whether
you are looking at methane or coal as the alternate fuel
...@atmos.umd.edu; geoengineering@googlegroups.com; James Rhodes
*Subject:* RE: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
The problem with using terrestrial biomass residues to combat CO2
accumulation is that there is a limited supply that is available for human
use
;
geoengineering@googlegroups.commailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com; James
Rhodes
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:38 AM, David Keith wrote:
while cofiring biomass in coal-fired power plants without capture does
not rank
@googlegroups.com; James Rhodes
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to burn depends on details like
whether you can burn the biomass AND bury its CO2, and whether you are looking
at methane or coal
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
Dear Andrew and all:
The question of bury or burn is an important one that is far from resolved.
One point emphasized by several people involved in implementing climate
mitigation strategies
: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to burn depends on details like
whether you can burn the biomass AND bury its CO2, and whether you are looking
at methane or coal as the alternate fuel for generating
...@atmos.umd.edu; geoengineering@googlegroups.com; James Rhodes
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to burn depends on details like
whether you can burn the biomass AND bury its CO2, and whether
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 15 de Setembro de 2010 12:36:58
Assunto: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
Regardless of the debate about carbon efficiencies, there are of course further
dimensions to the issue of crop waste.
The waste
sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
I agree with David that whether to bury or to burn depends on details like
whether you can burn the biomass AND bury its CO2, and whether you are looking
at methane or coal as the alternate fuel for generating electricity.
A big problem
: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Andrew, Marty etal:
There is a third Biomass option - Biochar.
Besides sequestration and energy, there is soil augmentation income. - with
(potentially) large increases in soil productivity (and food
]
On Behalf Of Ning Zeng
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 6:40 AM
To: geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz Center,
Washington DC
Dear Andrew and all:
The question of bury or burn is an important one that is far from resolved. One
point emphasized by several
10, 2010 2:21 PM
To: agask...@nc.rr.com
Cc: geoengineering
Subject: Re: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Isn't the main problem with CROPS that you're burying something which is
flammable, at the same time that similar flammable materials
Dear Andrew and all:
The question of bury or burn is an important one that is far from
resolved. One point emphasized by several people involved in
implementing climate mitigation strategies at the Heinz Center
workshop last week is that in general, there are many other
competitions with biomass
Hi
I'm aware of the limitations of crop waste as a fuel, but there are already
moves afoot to engineer processes which convert poor quality biomass to high
quality fuels. For one example of a solution to the 30pc problem, see
[mailto:agask...@nc.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:10 PM
To: Stuart Strand; z...@atmos.umd.edu; geoengineering;
climateintervent...@googlegroups.com
Cc: xbenf...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
I think
geoengineering@googlegroups.com;
climateintervent...@googlegroups.com
Cc: xbenf...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 3:48
Subject: RE: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Thanks, Alvia, for pointing this out. On second examination of the paper, I
After our publication it was pointed out to me that the ventilation rate of the
Gulf of Mexico is such that the half life of water there is about 250 years.
One of the major advantages of CROPS over terrestrial burial options is that
the biomass carbon separated from the atmosphere by the
To: agask...@nc.rr.com; z...@atmos.umd.edu; geoengineering
geoengineering@googlegroups.com; climateintervent...@googlegroups.com
Cc: xbenf...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:50
Subject: RE: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
After
...@nc.rr.com
Cc: geoengineering
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:20
Subject: Re: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
Isn't the main problem with CROPS that you're burying something which is
flammable, at the same time that similar
12:50
Subject: RE: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
After our publication it was pointed out to me that the ventilation rate of the
Gulf of Mexico is...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering@googlegroups.com; climateintervent...@googlegroups.com
Cc: xbenf...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:50
Subject: RE: [clim] Re: [geo] Carbon sequestration workshop Sep 9-10, Heinz
Center, Washington DC
After our publication it was pointed out to me that the ventilation
If you happen to be in the Washington DC area on Sep 9-10, i.e.,
tomorrow (apology for the late message!), you are welcome to join a
small workshop that aims at critically assessing the feasibility of
the emerging concept 'carbon sequestration via wood burial and
storage'. Details are below.
Best
29 matches
Mail list logo
