Re: [geo] EGU GE post mortem

2014-05-23 Thread John Nissen
Hi Ken and Greg, Reflecting on your point, Greg, it is extraordinary the widespread antagonism to geoengineering, when it is so obviously needed to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere and to prevent Arctic meltdown. We all ought to be campaigning for a grasping of the nettle of reality. We cannot rely

Re: [geo] EGU GE post mortem

2014-05-23 Thread Greg Rau
Thanks John. I share your sense of urgency. Given what is clearly at stake, it is amazing that we are forced to have discussions like this, in the absence of any effective global call to arms. It doesn't help that there isn't clarity in the science community on the seriousness of the problem

Re: [geo] EGU GE post mortem

2014-05-23 Thread Michael Hayes
In the article Ken attached, the text offers the view on CDR (which included BECCS) that None of these currently can be deployed quickly on a large scale.. Funding is the only limiting factor for many of the CDR methods. And, this view of CDR being a non-starter on the scale side of the

[geo] EGU GE post mortem

2014-05-22 Thread Rau, Greg
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/2014EO23/asset/eost2014EO23.pdf?v=1t=hvip8icos=b0ec7713c061bf0df5261c8049de962020c6d8b1 Selected quotes: If it's enough of an emergency to deploy the solar geoengineering system, it's enough of an emergency to stop deploying devices--power