Dr. Pasztor et al.,
I would like to recommend that the SDGs be the actual central pivot point of
any global carbon negative initiative, not just a yard stick.
SDG 14, as an example, calls for protection of the marine space and that same
space is our easiest source for pulling gigaton levels of
t: 21 August 2017 20:00
To: peter.eisenber...@gmail.com
Cc: s.sal...@ed.ac.uk; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon dioxide
emissions
Is imposing a discipline on the CDR communiy within our reach? What about
approaching science funders asking for CD
l.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, but the issue is how does that and other important ideas get
>>> into CDR policy, roadmapping and PR while seemingly more complex yet
>>> limited approaches like BECCS take center stage - better marketing,
>>> lobbyi
egically spread over the Earth and care can be
>> taken to spread their locations in such a way that developing countries
>> profit from the employment provided by the mining exploitation.
>> 5. Spreading olivine grains can be done in such a way that other
>> advantages of this s
ignoring any of these until
>> they are proven (rather than assumed to be) irrelevant?
>> Greg Rau
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* "Schuiling, R.D. (Olaf)" <r.d.sc...@uu.nl >
>> *To:* "'gh...@sbcglobal.net '" <gh...@sbcglob
billion years, Olaf Schuiling
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* geoengi...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> geoengi...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Greg Rau
> *Sent:* zondag 20 augustus 2017 1:22
> *To:* geoengi...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [geo] It’s time
egically spread over the Earth and care can be
>> taken to spread their locations in such a way that developing countries
>> profit from the employment provided by the mining exploitation.
>> 5. Spreading olivine grains can be done in such a way that other
>> advantages of thi
.net>>;
"geoengineering@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>"
<geoengineering@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:26 AM
Subject: RE: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon diox
et>; "
> geoengineering@googlegroups.com" <geoengineering@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:26 AM
> *Subject:* RE: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon
> dioxide emissions
>
> Well, the message is clear, but when I propose th
bcglobal.net>; "
> geoengineering@googlegroups.com" <geoengineering@googlegroups.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:26 AM
> *Subject:* RE: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon
> dioxide emissions
>
> Well, the message is clear, but when I
;'gh...@sbcglobal.net'" <gh...@sbcglobal.net>;
"geoengineering@googlegroups.com" <geoengineering@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:26 AM
Subject: RE: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon dioxide
emissions
#yiv6674855978 #
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Subject: [geo] It’s time to start talking about “negative” carbon dioxide
emissions
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/8/18/16166014/negative-emissions
"...it’s time for governments to start implementing policies that incentivize
the develo
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/8/18/16166014/negative-emissions
"...it’s time for governments to start implementing policies that incentivize
the development of carbon removal technologies. And not just one-off pilot
projects, either, like the one that is spectacularly failing
13 matches
Mail list logo
