Re: [geo] NASA Ames meeting

2013-06-03 Thread Lou Grinzo
This is an excellent, concise summary of the lock-in effect I've been droning on about for years, and I think it is still vastly un(der)appreciated by people concerned/engaged with climate change. There is some high-profile acknowledgement of this situation, e.g. IEA's top economist, Fatih

[geo] NASA Ames meeting

2013-06-01 Thread Alan Robock
Dear All, I also was at the NASA Ames meeting. It was my first geoengineering meeting, and it was there that I was struck with the very enthusiastic endorsement of geoengineering as a solution to global warming by people who did not seem to be aware of the potential negative impacts. But Lane

Re: [geo] NASA Ames meeting

2013-06-01 Thread Stephen Salter
Dear Alan Can you tell me which of your 26 objections apply to marine cloud brightening? I am sure that many of the people who want research on but not deployment of geoengineering systems are greatly reassured that you are there to spot the nasty problems. Keep up your valuable work. I

Re: [geo] NASA Ames meeting

2013-06-01 Thread Fred Zimmerman
I think it's important to distinguish between the effects of advocacy and the inertia of the energy system. I believe the inertia is huge relative to the effects of advocacy because of the tremendous switching costt of infrastructure, distribution, power systems. Advocacy affects choices at the