Simon and List,
Thank for your assurance. I will learn what I can from the details and
thank you for making them available. In my past readings on this concern,
only GCMs have been used to work this issue.
I will calm my concerns over sufur warming the poles based upon your
claims. Yet seeing an
Hi Michael,
our model does include PSC, and includes the important chemical reactions
that are related to those. We are running with most recent updated schemes
that from PSCs, liquid and ice clouds. You are welcome to dive into our
recent model description papers, if you like. Our model compares
Ben, if you ever do get around to running the model with PSCs, I would be
interested in viewing the results and learning more about the details of
your model.
As I have had my concerns over this sulfur/PSC issue for years, I've read
up on a number of models specifically crafted for PSCs and most
Hi Michael -
We do have a thorough treatment of polar stratospheric clouds in our
simulations. We haven't looked into the details that you're talking about,
but in principle, someone could.
I know basically nothing about wetted carbon. We used stratospheric
sulfate aerosols in our
Ben,
Judging from the topical description of this University Center for Atmospheric
Research recent work, in this model we do not find weight given to Sulfur's
role in Polar Stratospheric Cloud creation and the resulting heat feedback.
Hi Stephen -
I can say a ton about frequency response and phase shift. The foundation
for all of that work was done in this paper for solar reduction:
https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/469/2016/esd-7-469-2016.html
It turned out that we could use a similar control algorithm with a factor
of
Hi Ben
Can you say anything about frequency-response and phase-shift?
Stephen
Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design. School of Engineering,
University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3DW, Scotland
s.sal...@ed.ac.uk, Tel +44 (0)131 650 5704, Cell 07795 203 195,
