...@googlegroups.com javascript:
*Cc: *kle...@gmail.com javascript:, Ken Caldeira
kcal...@gmail.comjavascript:,
Juan Moreno-Cruz juan.mor...@econ.gatech.edu javascript:
*Sent: *Friday, February 22, 2013 1:27:41 PM
*Subject: *Re: [geo] Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering
coalitions
, Juan Moreno-Cruz
juan.moreno-c...@econ.gatech.edu
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 1:27:41 PM
Subject: Re: [geo] Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions
to exclude broad participation (new paper)
Dear Ron,
Thanks for your questions. I am going to post some answers below point
Dear Ron,
Thanks for your questions. I am going to post some answers below
point-by-point for clarity's sake. I hope these answers help clarify and
please feel free to contact me directly (kri...@carnegiescience.edu) if
they don't.
Kate
2. I looked carefully only at the South Asia region
Andrew,
The scenario in our paper assumes rising concentrations of CO2 in the
atmosphere. So, yes, decisions about mitigation have already been made
before decisions about solar geoengineering, and the implementation of
solar geoengineering does not influence future decisions about how much
As I understand it, this scenario excludes the interplay between games in
mitigation and games in geoengineering.
Present political debate around GE is highly affected by the interplay.
Indeed, it could be argued that this interplay is the central factor in
current debate.
The simplifying
