Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood

2013-05-12 Thread Charlie Zender
Well done, David. Your article has interesting perspectives on the main possibilities for model-measurement disagreement. Just eyeballing the video where (Rahmdorf's?) volcanic/solar/ENSO-attributed temperature swings are removed, it seems that ENSO is associated with the plurality of the

Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood

2013-05-11 Thread Emily L-B
I find it hard to read past a sentence when it is fundamentally flawed: the word 'instead' should read 'as well as'! 'Instead of reducing carbon emissions, let’s tinker' How frustrating! Best wishes all, Emily Sent from my BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Andrew Lockley

Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood

2013-05-11 Thread Tom Wigley
Exactly. People seem to have already forgotten the following ... Wigley, T.M.L., 2006: A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science 314, 452–454. Tom. On 5/11/2013 7:26 AM, Emily L-B wrote: I find it hard to read past a sentence

Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood

2013-05-11 Thread euggordon
...@gmail.com, geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 9:26:45 AM Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood I find it hard to read past a sentence when it is fundamentally flawed: the word 'instead' should

Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood

2013-05-11 Thread rongretlarson
andrew.lock...@gmail.com, geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:53:05 AM Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help - Steve Sherwood Emily: Good point. It is also true that at 400 ppm the global temperature has