, 2011 8:25 AM
*To:* agask...@nc.rr.com
*Cc:* andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all***
*
** **
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact
: andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is already
being used. What wasn't clear from
and wave energies are not renewable after all
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is
already
being used. What wasn't clear from the article was what type of impact
reducing the energy level of winds
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike MacCracken
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:22 AM
To: Govindasamy Bala; David Keith; Ken Caldeira
Cc: Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Dear David--I was going to ask
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike MacCracken
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:22 AM
To: Govindasamy Bala; David Keith; Ken Caldeira
Cc: Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Dear David
, 2011 8:25 AM
To: agask...@nc.rr.com
Cc: andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is already
case, it will
take decades to build such capacity which should not be our immediate concern
at all. Albert
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:17:40 +
Subject: Re: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
From: voglerl...@gmail.com
To: d.na...@gmail.com
CC: agask...@nc.rr.com
- Original Message -
From: Nando d.na...@gmail.com
To: agask...@nc.rr.com
Cc: andrew lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com, geoengineering
geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2011 8:25:22 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My
Wind and wave energy are the result of the conversion of solar energy into
kinetic energy, i.e. the motion of molecules. Once converted into kinetic
energy it's a use it or lose it proposition. Extracting kinetic energy from
the atmosphere or the ocean doesn't mean it won't be replaced by
Andrew
Most of the energy in waves is at present dissipated as heat in water
and sand at the beach. Data on the North Atlantic wave climate combined
with the flow of the North Atlantic Drift suggest an increase in
temperature on the beach by about 1/50 of a degree Celsius.
If we built
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is already
being used. What wasn't clear from the article was *what type* of impact
reducing the energy level of winds all over the globe through the prolific
use
9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energy are the result of the conversion of solar energy into
kinetic energy, i.e. the motion of molecules. Once converted into kinetic
energy it's a use it or lose it proposition. Extracting kinetic
12 matches
Mail list logo
