This technique would require a wave/solar powered buoy feeding a microbubble
stream(s) down the anchoring line to the appropriate depth. This type of buoy
could also function as a monitoring station reporting multiple sounding via
sat. link.
There is even much better systems such as Mixox,
There is no doubt about the feasibility of air CO2 capture; Nature does 16 GT
worth of net uptake each year. What also seems certain is that concentrating
CO2 from air is the last thing you want to do, as fundamental thermodynamics
predicts. Where was a discussion about existing and
Hi all,
The Stanford Journal of Law, Science Policy has released its new
volume on geoengineering at the following link:
http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjlsp/cgi-bin/articles/index.php?CatID=1013
This issue follows on from the Asilomar conference, and is dedicated
to Stephen Schneider. It
Hi Albert,
I have actually spent some time looking at this type of system for my own
lake. I am thinking through the design engineering details and will keep
this suggestion in mind.
The use of a bubbler line has two advantage that I think will be important.
In that, being able to adjust the
List (cc Dr. Rau, with thanks for alerting us to this interesting APS reporton
one form of CDR [below])
1. I found quite a few citations in addition to the NYTimes report by Mr.
Rudolf, but it took a while to get the actual 112 p report. It is at:
The *Stanford Journal of Law, Science Policy* has just published a special
issue on climate geoengineering. The Table of Contents and the URL (open
access) for the issue is listed below. wil
Dr. Wil Burns, Editor-in-Chief
Journal of International Wildlife Law Policy
2875 Shasta Road
Thanks for posting this link. This was a very interesting read.
I read your contribution concerning intergenerational equity and have a
question on one concept. I quote:
Unfortunately, while a commitment to SRM geoengineering approaches in lieu
of
effective mitigation responses might prove
