Hi Albert, I have actually spent some time looking at this type of system for my own lake. I am thinking through the design engineering details and will keep this suggestion in mind.
The use of a bubbler line has two advantage that I think will be important. In that, being able to adjust the depth of the oxygenation for each site will be optimize the oxidation time. Also, multiple bubbler lines could be used to extend the coverage area well beyond the buoy anchorage. This could greatly reduce the number of units needed to effect a large field of vents. The type of mixer you mentioned will be important in regards to low current areas like a bay or lake. Invention can move quickly when it is collaborative. Thanks for your in-put. - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
