Does anyone know where the final results from Lohafex were published (or
indeed if they were published?) There were, I think, some preliminary
results published within a year or so, but there doesn't seem to be a big
synoptic publication anywhere, or a special issue, or anything like that.
Am
I kind of object to the idea that the SPM process constitutes tampering by
politicians. First: it's the process, an intergovernmental process, that
gives the IPCC heft. It was baked into the design by Bert Bolin in order to
create a document that would fulfill politcal functions. If you don't
Dear David
When you're responding to my arguments, how do you get from carefully and
thoughtfully, in the quotation Ron offers, to in all ways the human
imagination can conceive? To me, and I suspect most readers, carefully
and thoughtfully means precisely what you say is required: that people
Dear David
Though obviously you couldn't know this, in the context of the preceding
paras, it should be fairly clear that the flight deck metaphor applies to a
range of choices of which climate geoengineering options are only a subset
(new energy sources, new farming practices etc) The
We need to do more research on geoengineering -- in Hove, Thursday 7th
November, 19:00 -- Free non-ticketed
Featuring Helena Paul, http://www.econexus.info/who-we-are, Matt Watson
http://thereluctantgeoengineer.blogspot.co.uk/, Andy Stirling
Dear Ron
Your expertise would obviously be valuable. I strongly suggest that you
offer to organise one or more sessions.
It may be that the advisory board (which I'm on) could do with more CDR
expertise, and I see no reason why, in principle, more could not be added.
I'll raise the question
Dear Greg
I really value much of what you post to this group, but could you possibly
start new threads when you post interesting new papers, rather than
slipping them into existing threads, as here? It would make getting stuff
out of these discussions a little easier, at least for me...
Very
I think there's a problem with intentended. It defines the act in terms
of the mental stance of the actor, which is not open to objective scrutiny,
This opens the possibility of large climate manipulations which are
geoengineering to some but not to others, which I think is what you're
trying
Ooops. I did what I was compaining about. Aimed at is as bad as
intended.
What i should have said: large-scale technological interventions that act
to decouple climate outcomes from cumulative greenhouse-gas emissions.
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 11:56:06 UTC+1, O Morton wrote:
I think
Ken
As always (I am a stuck record on this, for those old enough to remember
stuck records) surely it depends on the weasel word we
Imagine a world in which
*Bad Stuff, maybe Very Bad Stuff, is happening
*Research, including some field research, strongly suggests that sunshine
geoengineering
One very minor thing about this thread. Though I am happy for friends and I
suppose others to call me Oli, for professional work I do prefer Oliver
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 12:16:29 UTC+1, geoengineeringourclimate wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Oli Morton of The Economist has penned an Opinion
UTC-7, O Morton wrote:
David (and also Andrew),-- if you look at Morton's reasoning as
expressed in the text, you'll find that I don't agree.
The technology required for the industrial takeover of the nitrogen cycle
did not appear through an unguided process of innovation, nor
David (and also Andrew),-- if you look at Morton's reasoning as expressed
in the text, you'll find that I don't agree.
The technology required for the industrial takeover of the nitrogen cycle
did not appear through an unguided process of innovation, nor was it
deployed that way; the foresight
Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall
- Jim M.
Haywoodhttp://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1857.html#auth-1
,
- Andy
Joneshttp://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1857.html#auth-2
,
-
Sorry, Andrew, I seem to have thoughtlessly double threaded -- feel free to
put my recent post into this thread if that is within your moderating
remit...
On Monday, 1 April 2013 11:17:28 UTC+1, andrewjlockley wrote:
Posters note: a discussion of the policy implications of this paper can be
Please post follow ups on earlier thread: Asymmetric forcing from
stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Does anyone know where the term artificial volcano first came from? I
think it was Budyko, but I can't find hard evidence...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
The reported ratio of C:Fe for IEFEX is 10,000:1. The redfield C:P ration
is about 100:1. So you'd need your 100 tankers to be carrying pure
phosphate, not sewage, no?
On Thursday, 19 July 2012 09:13:22 UTC+1, M V Bhaskar wrote:
Ken
You are right to a certain extent when you say -
So, to
http://thereluctantgeoengineer.blogspot.de/2012/05/testbed-news.html
SPICE personal statement.
It is with some regret that today the SPICE team has announced we’ve
decided to call off the outdoor ‘1km testbed’ experiment that was scheduled
for later this year. The reasons for this are complex
I agree with Ninad; philosophy feeds on novelty in its continual
reassessments; it doesn't assimilate it in a serial model of progress.
Many philosophical problems are not solved (though they may be moved
outside the realm of philosophy by other developments), and few are
novel. There's a relevant
Some of these have now been posted here
http://www.iseee.ca/DACS/
by the excellent Mark Lowey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
A few points as someone at the meeting and, it appears, a gusher...
As Tim Fox pointed out in Calgary, the lack of any near-term
likelihood of large carbon markets paying substantial prices has
changed the terms of discussion. If DAC is to have any chance near
term (and my feeling was that the
I'm pretty sure that in Fred Pohl's early 1980s energy and climate
change novel The Cool War the fundamental heating issue is waste
heat, rather than greenhousing
On Jan 28, 7:42 am, Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months back we discussed a controversial set of papers which
Stephen (or John, or Phil, or anyone else) have any of your modellings
of cloud brightening looked at this effect? If you were to brighten
clouds under a dark aerosol (eg Asian Brown Cloud or equivalent off
west africa) might you not be trading warming at the surface for
warming at the dark
also, lower tides means less risk from raised sea level...
On Feb 5, 6:22 pm, BradGuth bradg...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not as hard as you might think, and we'd get up to 3.5% shade,
although that could easily be adjusted to suit, and there are a few
other benefits besides terrific job security
25 matches
Mail list logo
