Fwd: [geo] Another look at gunnery?

-- Forwarded message -- From: Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com Date: 5 April 2011 09:11 Subject: Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? To: Veli Albert Kallio albert_kal...@hotmail.com I don’t think that mine shafts are necessarily the right answer. The best approach IMO

RE: [geo] Another look at gunnery?

of altitude and thin atmosphere to help them carry payloads higher and to right areas of atmosphere. Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:08:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? From: voglerl...@gmail.com To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com CC: and...@andrewlockley.com; geoengineering

Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery?

Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com Date: 5 April 2011 09:11 Subject: Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? To: Veli Albert Kallio albert_kal...@hotmail.com I don’t think that mine shafts are necessarily the right answer. The best approach IMO would be to use either a vertical tower on a high-altitude

Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? (and adding an alternative Seitz albedo thread topic)

Subject: [geo] Another look at gunnery? Hi I've been going over some reports and notes recently, notably the Aurora report http://people.ucalgary.ca/~keith/Misc/AuroraGeoReport.pdf http://people.ucalgary.ca/%7Ekeith/Misc/AuroraGeoReport.pdf The report makes it pretty clear that they've not done

Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery?

somewhere around 10,000-15,000 kilogram projectiles of frozen, pulverised sulphuric acid in an explosive projectile shell. -- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:11:23 +0100 Subject: Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? From: andrew.lock...@gmail.com To: albert_kal...@hotmail.com

RE: [geo] Another look at gunnery?

using stratospheric balloons and aircraft that are readily available. Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 19:48:53 +0100 Subject: Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? From: andrew.lock...@gmail.com To: albert_kal...@hotmail.com; geoengineering@googlegroups.com The design of the Iraqi supergun is also

[geo] Another look at gunnery?

Hi I've been going over some reports and notes recently, notably the Aurora report http://people.ucalgary.ca/~keith/Misc/AuroraGeoReport.pdf The report makes it pretty clear that they've not done a huge amount to expand on gunnery as a tool. Specifically, the report states that: In the 80-100

Re: [geo] Another look at gunnery? (and adding an alternative Seitz albedo thread topic)

- Original Message - From: Andrew Lockley and...@andrewlockley.com To: geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, April 4, 2011 5:43:40 PM Subject: [geo] Another look at gunnery? Hi I've been going over some reports and notes recently, notably the Aurora report http