The Seitz A War Against Fire article seems to have been written in
ignorance of the paleoclimate data that existed. The Seitz argument, that
because it was hard to predict what was going to happen convincingly with
the knowledge then available fed into the computer models of the time, we
To Ken Caldeira and the geoengineering group,
Certainly using the atmosphere as a waste dump has to stop. If
atmospheric pollution can be slowed or reversed then the cause of global
security is helped, and I agree that an open-source study is preferable to
secrecy.
I am puzzled by the
Ken writes;
If a careful thinking through could occur, I think it would result in
greatly increased emphasis on *transforming our energy system into one
that does not rely on using the atmosphere as a waste dump.*
having written this :
As surely as C02 can absorb the warming
There is no CIA study.
There is a National Academy study that is funded by NOAA, NASA, the CIA,
and the National Academy itself.
All of these parties had a hand in developing the charge to the committee
which is publicly available here:
Media coverage for the CIA study. I will keep this up to date for 2 days.
http://www.climate-engineering.eu/single/items/press-review-cia-is-funding-a-study-on-ce.html
Greetings
Nils
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To
