Well done, David. Your article has interesting perspectives on the main
possibilities for model-measurement disagreement.
Just eyeballing the video where (Rahmdorf's?)
volcanic/solar/ENSO-attributed temperature swings
are removed, it seems that ENSO is associated with the plurality of the
http://theconversation.com/carbon-dioxide-hits-a-new-high-but-geo-engineering-wont-help-13840
Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help
Steve Sherwood
Director, Climate Change Research Centre at University of New South Wales
This week, carbon dioxide concentration
...@gmail.com
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 14:00:24
To: geoengineeringgeoengineering@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Subject: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help -
Steve Sherwood
http://theconversation.com
@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 14:00:24
To: geoengineeringgeoengineering@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Subject: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t help -
Steve Sherwood
http://theconversation.com/carbon-dioxide-hits-a-new-high-but-geo
...@gmail.com, geoengineering
geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 9:26:45 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t
help - Steve Sherwood
I find it hard to read past a sentence when it is fundamentally flawed: the
word 'instead' should
andrew.lock...@gmail.com, geoengineering
geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 10:53:05 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Carbon dioxide hits a new high, but geo-engineering won’t
help - Steve Sherwood
Emily:
Good point.
It is also true that at 400 ppm the global temperature has
