Thank you for posting this very interesting document, Andrew.
On line 365 we find the statement characterizing CDR technology as being new,
untested, and thus a large question mark in the equation.
The cheapest, fastest, and easiest way to pull CO2 out of the environment is my
pulling it out
Is it possible for the different teams of the Model Intercomparison
Project to now exted their analyses to GHGR Removal, instead of restraint
to CDR?
As written on 22nd August 2017, in another post by Phil Williamson (Science
Coordinator: UK GGR programme), the UK recently-started a *Greenhouse
List and cc Andrew:
Thanks again to Andrew for bringing these articles to our attention.
In addition to Andrew’s cite below, the full (free) article is at:
https://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2017-168/gmd-2017-168.pdf
https://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2017-168/
The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDR-MIP):
Rationale and experimental design
David P. Keller1, Andrew Lenton2,3, Vivian Scott4, Naomi E. Vaughan5, Nico
Bauer6, Duoying Ji7, Chris D. Jones8, Ben Kravitz9, Helene
