, 2011 8:25 AM
*To:* agask...@nc.rr.com
*Cc:* andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
*Subject:* Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all***
*
** **
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact
: andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is already
being used. What wasn't clear from
mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:10
Subject: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
· 30 March 2011 by Mark Buchanan
http://www.newscientist.com/search?rbauthors=Mark+Buchanan
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike MacCracken
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:22 AM
To: Govindasamy Bala; David Keith; Ken Caldeira
Cc: Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Dear David--I was going to ask
From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mike MacCracken
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:22 AM
To: Govindasamy Bala; David Keith; Ken Caldeira
Cc: Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Dear David
, 2011 8:25 AM
To: agask...@nc.rr.com
Cc: andrew.lock...@gmail.com; geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My reading of the article suggested that the authors of the study were
principally claiming that wind has an impact on climate, so it is already
case, it will
take decades to build such capacity which should not be our immediate concern
at all. Albert
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:17:40 +
Subject: Re: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
From: voglerl...@gmail.com
To: d.na...@gmail.com
CC: agask...@nc.rr.com
- Original Message -
From: Nando d.na...@gmail.com
To: agask...@nc.rr.com
Cc: andrew lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com, geoengineering
geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2011 8:25:22 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
My
Society. When you
actually find something under the bed I should be afraid of, wake me up.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Lockley
To: geoengineering
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:10
Subject: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energies
-
*From:* Andrew Lockley mailto:and...@andrewlockley.com
*To:* geoengineering mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Friday, April 01, 2011 8:10
*Subject:* [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
:* [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
- 30 March 2011 by *Mark
Buchanan*http://www.newscientist.com/search?rbauthors=Mark+Buchanan
- Magazine issue 2806 http://www.newscientist.com/issue/2806. *Subscribe
9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [geo] Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
Wind and wave energy are the result of the conversion of solar energy into
kinetic energy, i.e. the motion of molecules. Once converted into kinetic
energy it's a use it or lose it proposition. Extracting kinetic
Wind and wave energies are not renewable after all
- 30 March 2011 by *Mark
Buchanan*http://www.newscientist.com/search?rbauthors=Mark+Buchanan
- Magazine issue 2806 http://www.newscientist.com/issue/2806. *Subscribe
and save* http://www.newscientist.com/subscribe?promcode=nsarttop
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
