[geo] Re: Reverse termination shock

2018-03-13 Thread p.j.irvine
Hi, I think another issue is that you'd need to have mega-ton delivery capacity ready to go within a timescale of months. I don't see this being built up without there being a plan to use it. I agree with Andy that it seems wiser to start slowly than piggy-back off of a volcanic eruption Pete

[geo] Re: Reverse termination shock

2018-03-13 Thread Andy Parker
Hey Andrew, this approach would not be smart from a termination shock point of view. If you were to start SRM at a high degree of cooling, whether by volcano or by aeroplane, you would miss out on being able to check for side effects while slowing ramping up the system. Immediately turning SR

[geo] Re: Reverse termination shock

2018-03-12 Thread Vladislav Gerasimov
Well, to reach a cooling of the Global temperature by 0.5–2 C, we need a volcanic eruption like one of the following: VEI = 6 (Plinian eruption) the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption (-0.5C) the 1883 Krakatoa eruption (-3.0C) VEI = 7 (Ultra-Plinian eruption) the 1815 Tambora eruption (-(2.3–3.5)C, th