Re: [geos-devel] RFC 9: Restore C++ API as public API

more. I've run out of rational arguments. Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net (Sent from mobile) P. S. There is really no need for the epithets On Fri, 17 May 2019, 14:13 Regina Obe, wrote: > > > I'm a developer and a package manager (inside Google and somewhat still >

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 9: Restore C++ API as public API

the original concept. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

[geos-devel] RFC 9: Restore C++ API as public API

your feedback. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] [PSC] Commit access removal

On 2 October 2017 at 13:00, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 12:20:22PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 2 October 2017 at 11:57, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote

Re: [geos-devel] [PSC] Commit access removal

On 2 October 2017 at 11:57, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Following the procedure outlined in RFC2: >> >> I'd like to give up my privilege of write and commit access >> to GEOS repo

[geos-devel] [PSC] Commit access removal

Dear PSC, Following the procedure outlined in RFC2: I'd like to give up my privilege of write and commit access to GEOS repositories. Please, remove OSGeo ID mloskot from the committers. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] RFC6 - Drop GEOS C++ API at GEOS 3.8

On 2 October 2017 at 10:08, Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > On 2 October 2017 at 09:30, Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> On 2017-10-02 09:13, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>>> >>>> As Bas said already it causes packagers headaches. >>&

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] RFC6 - Drop GEOS C++ API at GEOS 3.8

On 2 October 2017 at 09:30, Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 2017-10-02 09:13, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>> >>> As Bas said already it causes packagers headaches. >> >> So, the solution is to take the toys away from the kids... > > > Plea

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] RFC6 - Drop GEOS C++ API at GEOS 3.8

____ > postgis-devel mailing list > postgis-de...@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] GEOS C++ API deprecated? (was: PostGIS 2.5 what should be minimum requirements?)

On 1 October 2017 at 22:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 10/01/2017 10:05 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 1 October 2017 at 21:47, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >>> On 10/01/2017 09:33 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] GEOS C++ API deprecated? (was: PostGIS 2.5 what should be minimum requirements?)

On 1 October 2017 at 22:17, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> I only ask Sandro, as the GEOS leader/PSC member to answer one question: >> >> Do you plan to practically deprecate GEOS C++ API

Re: [geos-devel] [postgis-devel] GEOS C++ API deprecated? (was: PostGIS 2.5 what should be minimum requirements?)

On 1 October 2017 at 21:47, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 10/01/2017 09:33 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> Unless, Sandro, your aim is to eventually mark C++ API deprecated >> and stop installing C++ API libraries and headers. >> >> That will

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS C++ API deprecated? (was: PostGIS 2.5 what should be minimum requirements?)

On 1 October 2017 at 20:47, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 09:26:42PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> /topic changed >> /cc geos-devel >> >> On 30 September 2017 at 20:47, Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > >&

[geos-devel] GEOS C++ API deprecated? (was: PostGIS 2.5 what should be minimum requirements?)

/topic changed /cc geos-devel On 30 September 2017 at 20:47, Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> writes: > >>> There isn't agreement about whether it is a bug for packages to use the >>> GEOS C++ API. If it really is

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS 3.7.0 beta end this week

On 10 Sep 2017 1:37 am, "Regina Obe" wrote: I thought we were going to wait for that change in GEOS 3.8 but I see you guys have started already. Or tag/branch master at last commit before first C++11 change. Mateusz ___ geos-devel

[geos-devel] [clang-tidy] modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-override

/b7101be6533a1273f715a3309889c23b7ae02e4f Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Can we deprecate GeometryList class?

On 6 September 2017 at 21:13, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > > AFAICT, GeometryList class is not used anywhere. > > Can we ditch the class completely? FYI, GeometryList class has been ditched. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://

[geos-devel] Reviewing std::auto_ptr spaghetti

{ auto_ptr items; public auto_ptr getItems() { return items; } }; Is the intention to give up the object's internal resource, really? For example, in LineSegmentVisitor and possibly (lot) more places. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS 3.7.0 release in 2 weeks

rac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC5 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Accompanying .editorconfig with .gitattributes?

o Santilli > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:10 PM > To: GEOS Development List <geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org> > Subject: Re: [geos-devel] Accompanying .editorconfig with .gitattributes? > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:56:17PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > > Hi, > > &g

[geos-devel] Accompanying .editorconfig with .gitattributes?

. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

[geos-devel] Renaming svn-trunk branch to master (#822)

Hi, I'll be working on renaming the git branches https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/822 The plan is to rename, break, fix. My apologies for inconvenience. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos

Re: [geos-devel] github mirror broken by protected branches

On 11 April 2017 at 07:14, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > Someone enabled protected branches on GitHub, That someone was me, you are aware of it. > but this breaks mirroring. Please disable protected branches, Done Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateus

Re: [geos-devel] Breeding .editorconfig is bad

On 7 April 2017 at 13:35, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:04:00PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Often, single file contains bits in styles and such scoped .editorconfig >> will lead to commits mixing actual (logic/behaviour) code change

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 7 April 2017 at 13:26, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> approach based on suggesting/requesting to join SAC and join admin efforts >> or join gogs/gitea and contribute, whenever someone expres

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

make more harm than good. It certainly won't help to justify self-hosted OSGeo infrastructure to the Community. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

[geos-devel] Breeding .editorconfig is bad

into desired style. Alternatively, please, make your editors ignore .editorconfig completely and manually align with coding style as presented in actual file being edited. That's what I'm going to do. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

tion. > How many people in OSGeo community even know about such an offer? I don't know. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 6 April 2017 at 22:46, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:32:07PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Drone has zero value. > > At this very moment "Dronie" is the only green badge we have here: > https://trac.osgeo.org/

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 6 April 2017 at 16:05, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Anyhow, I am going to use GitHub (and PRs) as the primary >> channel for commits, to allow myself the advantage of pre-factum CI.. > &

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 6 April 2017 at 15:05, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:47:25AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 6 April 2017 at 11:39, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > >> > This was the plan since February 2016: >> > https:/

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 6 April 2017 at 11:39, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:27:26AM -0700, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> >> I wasn't aware we are going to stick to Trac. PIT(Y|A). > > This was the plan since February 2016: > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipe

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

Mateusz Loskot wrote > On 4 April 2017 at 23:58, Regina Obe > lr@ > wrote: >> As a core maintainer, does it really matter so much to you whether you >> make your commits to Gogs or Github? > > No, it does not. I wasn't aware we are going to stick to Trac. PIT(Y|A).

Re: [geos-devel] github.com/libgeos vs github.com/OSGeo ?

On 5 April 2017 at 22:33, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:07:59PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Next, I'd like to transfer >> >> https://github.com/libgeos/libgeos -> https://github.com/OSGeo/geos >> >> Do

Re: [geos-devel] github.com/libgeos vs github.com/OSGeo ?

On 5 April 2017 at 17:58, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> >> In the spirit of community re-integration, wouldn't it be better to merge >> into github.com/OSGeo/GEOS ? > > As long as my

[geos-devel] github.com/libgeos vs github.com/OSGeo ?

Hi, What is the benefit of having own GitHub organization? In the spirit of community re-integration, wouldn't it be better to merge into github.com/OSGeo/GEOS ? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

And, as one of mantra requests processing admins, I can only confirm users do get annoyed and often share comments how annoying it is. Greg, most OSGeo projects have de facto switched to GitHub: 8 in 22 use OSGeo SVN 6 in 22 use OSGeo Track 21 in 22 use GitHub It somewhat indicates preferences

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

On 4 April 2017 at 23:58, Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > As a core maintainer, does it really matter so much to you whether you make > your commits to Gogs or Github? No, it does not. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateus

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

end the resistance. we use 90% of the surrounding services, but we die hard to not to say the final "Yes, I do" :-) [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/InfrastructurePreferencesStatusQuo [2] https://twitter.com/howardbutler/status/842766853088919552

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

, its not-so-kosher open core model. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Ready to switch from SVN to GIT ?

gt; > At the moment the GIT repository tracked by Trac is the one > managed by Gogs. https://github.com/OSGeo/GEOS My opinion as a committer and developer, not PSC member. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ g

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

On 3 April 2017 at 23:48, Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: >> On Apr 3, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: >> >>> but I too would note that range-based for loops don't work in MSVC 2013. >> >> Hmm, I'm not sure it

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

On 3 April 2017 at 17:19, Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >>> I'd rather wait for more votes than two. >>> If

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

On 29 March 2017 at 23:18, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > Dear PSC, All, > > For your delectation, RFC5 <https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC5> > > This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as > minimum supported version of C++ language. > >

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS Matrix/IRC rooms

On 1 Apr 2017 13:33, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> wrote: On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 01:25:14PM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On 1 Apr 2017 09:40, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > > [ please pay more attention to quoting ! ] > > I do. Given I

Re: [geos-devel] [geos-commits] r4387 - trunk/tests/unit

On 31 Mar 2017 21:32, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> wrote: On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 06:47:37PM -0700, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > The tests use mixture of whitespaces and indentation rules. Is that also true within the same directory ? I don't know, i haven't checked if tests/

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS Matrix/IRC rooms

On 31 Mar 2017 21:43, "Sandro Santilli" wrote: FYI I've created a Matrix room bridged to a Freenode IRC channel: https://matrix.to/#/#osgeo-geos:matrix.org irc://irc.freenode.net/#osgeo-geos Matrix also supports bridging to other chat systems, if needed, which can be used to get

[geos-devel] RFC 5: C++11 Compilation Mode

Dear PSC, All, For your delectation, RFC5 <https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC5> This document proposes to switch GEOS to C++11 as minimum supported version of C++ language. Please review, provide your feedback. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.losk

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 4: Code Formatting Style

On 23 March 2017 at 18:25, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > Dear PSC, All, > > For your delectation, RFC4 <http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC4> > [...] > Please review, provide your feedback. FYI, I added "Miscellaneous" section and added a curio

Re: [geos-devel] RFC 4: Code Formatting Style

On 23 March 2017 at 18:42, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 06:25:05PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> For your delectation, RFC4 <http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/wiki/RFC4> > > Thanks for the time you put into this Mateusz. > I lik

[geos-devel] RFC 4: Code Formatting Style

omment on that as well. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Porting recent JTS contributions to GEOS

On 21 March 2017 at 14:09, Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote: > Daniel Baston wrote >> Some interesting new code has recently gone into JTS, for example a KNN >> search on STRtrees (https://github.com/locationtech/jts/pull/75). >> >> JTS is now under th

Re: [geos-devel] Porting recent JTS contributions to GEOS

Daniel Baston wrote > Some interesting new code has recently gone into JTS, for example a KNN > search on STRtrees (https://github.com/locationtech/jts/pull/75). > > JTS is now under the Eclipse license. Can post-1.14 contributions still > be > ported to GEOS and released under LGPL? We should

Re: [geos-devel] Slack: #geos

On 19 Mar 2017 09:41, "Sandro Santilli" <s...@kbt.io> wrote: On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:41:53AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > FYI, there is OSGeo team on Slack [1] > I have created #geos channel where I'm going go plug in > GitHub, Travis CI, AppVeyor integrations. I h

[geos-devel] Slack: #geos

Hi, FYI, there is OSGeo team on Slack [1] I have created #geos channel where I'm going go plug in GitHub, Travis CI, AppVeyor integrations. [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2015-August/005779.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [geos-devel] geos-3.6.1 released

ble apps with cmake -DBUILD_OSSIM_APPS=OFF This has nothing to do with GEOS, so please post to OSSIM folks. Or, if you still think it is GEOS issue, try to report the problem more clearly, detailed explanation where/how GEOS failed. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Union of XYZ or XYM polygons

port. You may try to implement coordinate interfaces, as briefely explained here https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/browser/trunk/include/geos/geom/CoordinateSequence.h#L46 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list ge

Re: [geos-devel] status of C++ API - is it a bug to use it or not?

It's a freedom of choice GEOS users have. If one decides to use GEOS, she/he has to decide which GEOS API to use and the frontpage you link above clearly states which one is stable. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-de

Re: [geos-devel] 3.5 not built by Debbie?

On 8 June 2016 at 07:35, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:51:12AM +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> https://debbie.postgis.net/view/GEOS/ does not list 3.5 branch, >> is that right? > > I'd think no. The 3.5 branch bu

[geos-devel] 3.5 not built by Debbie?

Hi, https://debbie.postgis.net/view/GEOS/ does not list 3.5 branch, is that right? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Travis: xmltester/tests/bug176.xml: Failed to open file

On 7 March 2016 at 10:49, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 12:57:41AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed on Travis CI build [1], there seem to be some test data files >> missing: > > It sounds like a lack

[geos-devel] Travis: xmltester/tests/bug176.xml: Failed to open file

Could not load /home/travis/build/libgeos/libgeos/tests/xmltester/tests/bug244.xml: Failed to open file Could not load /home/travis/build/libgeos/libgeos/tests/xmltester/tests/bug275.xml: Failed to open file [1] https://travis-ci.org/libgeos/libgeos/jobs/113971087 Best regards, -- Mateusz

Re: [geos-devel] GeometryFilter vs GeometryComponentFilter on GeometryCollection

On 4 March 2016 at 15:44, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:02:22PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> Is this intentional that both filters pass the root geometry >> (containing GeometryCollection or Multi*) >> itself to apply_

[geos-devel] GeometryFilter vs GeometryComponentFilter on GeometryCollection

Hi, Is this intentional that both filters pass the root geometry (containing GeometryCollection or Multi*) itself to apply_rw and apply_ro? Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] GCC 6 build error

On 3 March 2016 at 11:10, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> However, we should be able to rely on that any C++11 compliant toolset >> seeing #include makes std::nan and std::isfinite available.

Re: [geos-devel] GCC 6 build error

On 3 March 2016 at 09:27, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 2 March 2016 at 17:13, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: >> > >> > This is the snippet, in configure.ac, to l

Re: [geos-devel] Union of linestrings

On 1 March 2016 at 16:06, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:41:37PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> On 1 March 2016 at 15:09, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Mateusz Losko

Re: [geos-devel] Union of linestrings

On 1 March 2016 at 15:09, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:52:32PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> What about constructing a single LineString from connected >> segments, instead of a MultiLineString? > > LineMerge operation

Re: [geos-devel] Union of linestrings

On 29 February 2016 at 20:10, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:18:08PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've started adding tests for OverlayOp [1] and I noticed >> curious results for basic test case. >> >>

[geos-devel] Union of linestrings

Hi, I've started adding tests for OverlayOp [1] and I noticed curious results for basic test case. OverlayOp(UNION) on Four segments of a sqare always construct a MultiLineString. I'd have expected a polygon, shouldn't I? In this case, I noticed OverlayOp always labels edges as UNDEF or

Re: [geos-devel] Moving GEOS repository to GIT

On 5 February 2016 at 09:16, Sandro Santilli wrote: > Are all GEOS committers ok with moving the code from SVN > to GIT, while keeping the current trac instance ? +1 Best regards, -- Mateusz Łoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___

Re: [geos-devel] updating geos 3.5.0 source archive.

oice, especially if it is a choice between officially supported APIs. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] updating geos 3.5.0 source archive.

On 10 November 2015 at 12:11, Jürgen E. <j...@norbit.de> wrote: > On Tue, 10. Nov 2015 at 10:50:57 +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> There is, however, cost involved. That is, GEOS does not promise C++ API/ABI >> stability, so those who choose GEOS C++ API shoul

Re: [geos-devel] Object Destruction

ordSeq_destroy for this purpose. > Is myGeosGeometry->getFactory()->destroyGeometry(myGeosGeometry) the intended > way to delete Geometry objects? IMO, yes, whenever you have access to "named destructor", call it. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net __

Re: [geos-devel] Object Destruction

API does not provide such method(s), so GEOS does not have it either - GEOS is a direct port of JTS without any (or strictly limited) custom extension to the master API defined in JTS. However, it would be best if Sandro chimed in and clarify that. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.lo

[geos-devel] [wip] Windows builds on AppVeyor

, there is a strange issue with 64-bit build, see details: http://help.appveyor.com/discussions/problems/3203-vs2015-and-incorrect-mspdb140dll-version It seems, that the issue is strange to AppVeyor support folks too. I'm looking for some AppVeyor gurus that could help here. Best regards, -- Mateusz

Re: [geos-devel] [wip] Windows builds on AppVeyor

On 13 October 2015 at 16:05, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > Sorry for the ignorance, but ... what is appveyor ? Think of Travis CI for Windows. > Does it provide a nice-looking badge we can add to the README.md ? :> Yes, of course :) Best regards, -- Mateus

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS 3.5.0 remaining open tickets

On 16 Jul 2015 12:09, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 03:28:22AM -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote: Strk et. al, --- this one I closed as a won't fix though I felt a bit guilty about it I only use CMake now for building and if someone who uses Makefile.vc for

[geos-devel] Port DoubleDouble and CGAlgorithmsDD support (PR #40)

, perhaps DD support could be applied to the upstream. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] WKB representation is EWKB, not OGC

On 5 December 2013 19:52, Paul Ramsey pram...@cleverelephant.ca wrote: That thread includes a (dead) link to the (approved) OGC change that added PostGIS-style 2.5 D handling of WKB (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2004-December/000695.html) Here is another one with the original

Re: [geos-devel] help compiling windows library

, search for it in the GEOS sources tree, check if corresponding .cpp is in the makefile, add it if it isn't. That's usually my take on this kind of problems with NMAKE. p.s. Once you apply necessary update to makefile.vc, please submit patch to http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ Best regards, -- Mateusz

Re: [geos-devel] geos_svn_revision.h and cmake

. CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:260 (configure_file): configure_file Problem configuring file It was included in the commit: http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/changeset/3861 and I can see it there: http://svn.osgeo.org/geos/trunk/tools/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Re: [geos-devel] geos_svn_revision.h and cmake

contributions, they're hugely welcome! I'll try to test them and commit. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony, wspinanie.pl ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] geos_svn_revision.h and cmake

On 3 August 2013 16:31, David Burken dbur...@comcast.net wrote: On 8/3/2013 10:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 3 August 2013 15:17, David Burken dbur...@comcast.net wrote: All, I have a patch to auto generate the geos_svn_revision.h. After fixing my error, I wasn't sure if I should submit

Re: [geos-devel] Motion to give Regina commit rights - PSC members who haven't Please respond

, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Motion to give Regina commit rights - PSC members who haven't Please respond

On 19 July 2013 10:44, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 19 July 2013 10:36, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: Mateusz, could you please also show your availability to do add the required bits (holiday season here

Re: [geos-devel] SVN Administrator (was: Motion to give Regina commit rights - PSC members) who haven't Please respond

On 19 July 2013 11:38, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:46:19AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 19 July 2013 10:44, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 19 July 2013 10:36, Sandro Santilli s

Re: [geos-devel] Ability to preallocate the WKT stringstream buffer for really large geometries?

://alexott.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/boostspirit2-vs-atoi.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Ability to preallocate the WKT stringstream buffer for really large geometries?

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/stof Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Compiling geos with mingw64

/BuildingOnWindowsWithCMake You may also consider ticket with .patch file attached, with svn diff output. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Possible to link dynamically to GEOS C interface?

linking. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Possible to link dynamically to GEOS C interface?

On 19 October 2012 13:16, Crispin Cooper coope...@cf.ac.uk wrote: On 19/10/2012 12:53, Mateusz Loskot wrote: It doesn't say anything about static linking. Best regards, Sorry - think I need a new brain this afternoon! I meant explicit linking. I'd like to link explicitly at runtime, rather

Re: [geos-devel] GEOS License and iOS usage

question fits the JTS mailing list first. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JTS_Topology_Suite Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #556: Build error using cmake: ../geos_svn_revision.h: No such file or directory

(almost) do whatever you want, but that is not the point. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #556: Build error using cmake: ../geos_svn_revision.h: No such file or directory

On 25 June 2012 15:08, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:05:59PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 25 June 2012 13:01, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:59:31AM -, GEOS wrote:  Simply, I'd suggest to avoid making the whole

Re: [geos-devel] [GEOS] #556: Build error using cmake: ../geos_svn_revision.h: No such file or directory

On 25 June 2012 16:34, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote: On 25 June 2012 15:08, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: It's very weak to depend on the discipline of the builder to always run ./configure (or cmake) after each and every SVN update, so the result would often

Re: [geos-devel] Cutting a 3.3.5 release

Sandro, I've been travelling in Poland with no solid connection. I'll check what's there to be done and try to fix it within next few days. -- Mateusz Loskot (Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting) On 22 Jun 2012 13:30, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote: After

Re: [geos-devel] polygon with overlapping edges

this polygon is not simple, thus not valid according to OGC SF spec. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net ___ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Re: [geos-devel] Moving to github

On 27/09/11 13:45, Sandro Santilli wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:45:40PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: Also, Alex (wildintellect) mentioned [1] OSGeo may introduce Git support in near future. ...handing over to decision makers. [1] http://logs.qgis.org/slogs/%23qgis.2011-09-24.log

Re: [geos-devel] Moving to github

On 23/09/11 12:28, Sandro Santilli wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:46:23AM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 21/09/11 17:08, Sandro Santilli wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:44:28PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote: IOW, how someone can make the import, so you can configure the cronjob

  1   2   3   >