(cross-posted from Matrix on request)
I've been hesitant to add a voice into the fray, but perhaps now is a good
time. One of the many wonders of getting to build things on top of GEOS is
getting to stand on the shoulders of giants. Giants who sometimes have
giant opinions, but have also put in
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 5:56 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:56:43PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 2, 2021, at 4:35 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:26:16PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
Let's just say we'll take
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:58:45PM +, Nicklas Larsson wrote:
> I think it would be regrettable if also GEOS went all-in for GitHub. In my
> opinion -- apart from sharing a skeptical view with Sandro and Regina
> regarding move everything to The One Corp -- in particular the Issue system
>
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 05:44:36PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > For the software components we currently have 4 public
> > repositories and 2 private ones listed on the Gitea organization
> > page, would you also want to move all of them to GitHub ?
>
> I can't see the private ones, but of the
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:56:43PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 2, 2021, at 4:35 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:26:16PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >>
> >> Let's just say we'll take contributions whereever, like now, but
> >> honestly, we take what
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 5:33 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 10:45:30AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
• Easier path for new contributors to discover and assist with the
project
>>>
>>> Easier how ? What would be possible for new contributors which is not
>>>
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 10:45:30AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >>• Easier path for new contributors to discover and assist with the
> >> project
> >
> > Easier how ? What would be possible for new contributors which is not
> > possible today ?
>
> Easier in that they don't need to grok the
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 4:35 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:26:16PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> Let's just say we'll take contributions whereever, like now, but
>> honestly, we take what we see, so it's a little disingenuous to say
>> "sure, we take contribs at
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:26:16PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> Let's just say we'll take contributions whereever, like now, but
> honestly, we take what we see, so it's a little disingenuous to say
> "sure, we take contribs at all these 5 places!"). So I take GH and Trac
> and email. I don' t
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:12:04AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>>>
>>> That's a 404 for me.
>>>
>> [Regina Obe]
>> It will
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:12:04AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > > http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
> >
> > That's a 404 for me.
> >
> [Regina Obe]
> It will come back once pramsey has reset the config. It's really
>
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 5:00 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> More dependence on single corporation being the only one which can do work on
> the infrastructure. Anyone can be a contributor on OSGeo
> infrastructure so "only they can do" is a misleading picture, as if "they"
> would not be all of
I haven't laid out a scheme, I'd presume to borrow one from another old-school
project like GDAL or Proj and use that for our issue tags and issue tagging
process. Maybe Even or someone could point us to what's the state of the art in
their poject.
Really simple (but we don't use a lot
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> • Migrate the (current, useful) contents of the Trac wiki to the new
>> web framework
>
> Meaning it would not be a wiki anymore ?
Correct, it will be the web site, with an 'edit on github' link on every page.
>> • Easier
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 3:00 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>
> That's a 404 for me.
https://github.com/libgeos/geos/blob/main/web/content/development/rfcs/rfc10.md
P
>
>> GitHub has
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>
> That's a 404 for me.
>
[Regina Obe]
It will come back once pramsey has reset the config. It's really because
gh-pages is a branch of our core github branch
and that is not
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
That's a 404 for me.
> GitHub has been the largest source of 3rd party code contribution via
> pull-requests for some time now.
>
> Moving to Github has the following components:
>
>
+1
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:13 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>
> GitHub has been the largest source of 3rd party code contribution via
> pull-requests for some time now.
>
> Moving to Github has the following components:
>
> • Move the canonical
+1
Dan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:13 PM Paul Ramsey
wrote:
> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>
> GitHub has been the largest source of 3rd party code contribution via
> pull-requests for some time now.
>
> Moving to Github has the following components:
>
> • Move the
> On Oct 30, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> as an occasional contributor, I'm fully supportive.
>
> What is the intent of the "Web scraping the Trac ticket contents and placing
> in a geos-old-tickets repo" ? (I assume you mean a github repo). To have a
> "backup" of the Trac
Hi,
as an occasional contributor, I'm fully supportive.
What is the intent of the "Web scraping the Trac ticket contents and
placing in a geos-old-tickets repo" ? (I assume you mean a github repo).
To have a "backup" of the Trac content that is easily browsable by
non-Trac users ? That
> On Oct 29, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
>
> GitHub has been the largest source of 3rd party code contribution via
> pull-requests for some time now.
>
> Moving to Github has the following components:
>
> • Move the canonical
> From: geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 3:13 PM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: [geos-devel] GEOS RFC 10 - Move Project to GitHub
>
> http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
http://libgeos.org/development/rfcs/rfc10/
GitHub has been the largest source of 3rd party code contribution via
pull-requests for some time now.
Moving to Github has the following components:
• Move the canonical (writeable) repository to GitHub
• Migrate the (current, useful)
24 matches
Mail list logo
