A big +1 to swagger. I'm pushing all the projects I'm involved with towards
it, and indeed I'd like a 'next generation' of open standards -> OGC specs
to be conversations around swagger specs, instead of big word documents.
At Planet we started with RAML, but then got a dev who had lots of
experie
+1 Andrea, I'd love to see this in GeoServer. At Planet Labs we've been
thinking about this as well. Esri supports it in their stuff, not sure when
they added it, but I see it in their tiles.
Jason, at least for my purposes this is geared for raster, and indeed as
Andrea points out, when you want
I think the OL3 team is aiming to get the final release out tomorrow. Not
positive if they're on track or not, but if we wait a day we may be able to
use the final version.
And I'm +1 on ol3 format link on 2.6.x
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Thanks Justin, I would like
I actually like the idea of doing an extension module for it. Even the
module is really just a tutorial and instructions, I think it could raise
the visibility of it substantially. Since many people just go to the
download page, especially if they've been using GeoServer for awhile. I
think it's ok
Well, you can't actually make pull requests on the github wiki afaik. But
you can just use markdown in the main github repo, which is what I do for
most wiki type things now. It works quite a bit better than using the
github wiki.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I have a s
ke to figure
> out and angle for less devel team effort.
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> Thinking about the website got me wondering about if people might be in
>> to featuring http://gis.stackexchange.com/tags/geos
Thinking about the website got me wondering about if people might be in to
featuring http://gis.stackexchange.com/tags/geoserver more prominently?
We already get 10 - 20 geoserver related questions there a week, so there's
already an active community answering stuff. I know Andrea and Ian are on
i
Awesome work Justin!
Having the site on github will be really great, and you first
implementation cut looks good.
As for more dynamic content, would be nice to do gsip's and rnd pages on
github. But having the historical and the current all on one page is quite
nice, and it'd probably be a big pa
ri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> (apologies for long silence on stuff, have been taking some time away)
>>
>> I think one thing we might consider is only doing LTS releases on like
>> ev
(apologies for long silence on stuff, have been taking some time away)
I think one thing we might consider is only doing LTS releases on like
evens or odds, to potentially ease things on us more. The one thing that
strikes me on these schedules is that LTS is just kind of 'old'. The Ubuntu
LTS con
Er, right, still have some 'send from' things that go from opengeo, though
it won't work. So reply to this one, with my gmail.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> (apologies for long silence on stuff, have been taking some time away)
>
> I think one
Browser identification tool would be ideal imho. Would be really great to
have most people using it as the default preview. If we can't do that then
the output format would be good to add, but I feel like most people
wouldn't see it then.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> My memory is hazy, but I think we decided if they become a real committer
>> they need to sign the contributors agreement. If it's just a community
>> modul
My memory is hazy, but I think we decided if they become a real committer
they need to sign the contributors agreement. If it's just a community
module, or some patches, then they don't. I believe the thinking was that
if we ever had trouble we could pretty easily remove and redo small
contribution
Great work Andrea. I don't have admin rights either.
My guess is maybe Jody? There's 5 people listed as 'members':
https://github.com/geoserver?tab=members Would probably be good to get
admin rights for more people, so we never get locked out in the future.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andr
we could also make our own extension for a geotools geopackage, see
https://github.com/opengis/geopackage/blob/master/spec/7_extensions-mechanism.md
> So yeah, long story short some work to get it up to the latest.
>
>
Cool, thanks Justin.
> -Justin
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2
This sounds awesome Andrea. Psyched to see what improvements it leads to
when plugged in to the whole wms output pipeline.
Doing the PNGJ one sounds like the better route especially if the author
will solve the raster encoding stuff.
Definitely +1 here for a community module.
On Sun, Aug 11, 20
Did you ever get this merged in Justin? I don't see it on
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/tree/master/src/community Though I
may not be looking at the right place.
OGC just released the candidate standard for comments, see
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/requests/105
I'm working on
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> given that we haven't had a roadmap for a long time, can we just remove
> the roadmap link from the home page?
>
>
Sounds reasonable to me.
> I believe the template for the home page is some static HTML that only
> people from OpenGeo
Are you making a separate page for labels? Or doing all the labeling
options there?
I just spent a good bit of time working on labeling options and defaults in
MapStory. A very common complaint was 'all my labels aren't showing up'.
Ended up doing different defaults for our styler stuff, but there
Nice thoughts Andrea. A few responses in line. In general we considered
most all of this out of scope for geopackage 1.0, but it is of interest for
many. And I think a next testbed should lead to modifications of geopackage
and service specs. Some people have talked about a 'geopackage service',
bu
Hey Jukka, thanks for all the feedback. I've been working on the
specification, and just send the information to the group (and I hope to
use this experience to figure out how to help open up the process more, so
you could join it just like an open source project instead of me having to
be a go bet
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Justin Deoliveira
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> To go along with the geopkg module just added to geotools we have also
>>> developed an
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> To go along with the geopkg module just added to geotools we have also
>> developed an output format for geoserver capable of producing a geopackage
>> file from a
Is there any specific reason that the grouping labeling option is yes/no,
instead of true/false?
See
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/styling/sld-reference/labeling.html#grouping-features-group
All the others are true/false, which makes it easier for us to do nice
checkboxes in the GUI's
Thanks! Trying it out now.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> If it's easy for someone to make a build
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Andrea Aime > wrote:
>
>> Hi PSC members,
>> I've just finished manual testing of the kml2 module against the GS
>> documentation, all works as expected (and actually, better than in the
>> current kml module),
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> Looking at it I think it needs to be as complicated as your questions
>> imply.
>>
>> You don't need to set a target amount. People just post the i
Looking at it I think it needs to be as complicated as your questions imply.
You don't need to set a target amount. People just post the incentive for
what it is worth to them. If no one fixes then no one does.
Any developer (even non core committers, though that's unlikely) can then
make a patch
Nice! I've always wanted that - wfs output that just removes the style.
I'm curious, are you doing schema / extended data for the wms kml output?
Or are they an option people can add? So you can have the styled kml with
all the data? I haven't looked at KML in awhile, but I remember wanting
that o
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> One thing I have been mulling over lately is if we might be able to make
>> it easier to go from a single image to an image mosiac / image pyramid.
>>
>>
a big topic, just curious on current thinking, if it's a
goal to unite image stuff in some way. Or if that's just unrealistic. Or if
there's better routes to achieve it.
C
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> +1, makes good sense to me.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun
+1, makes good sense to me.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> the image pyramid extension is a bit of a oddball: it has an extension
> release package but does not have an extension module.
>
> I wanted to add a file browser for its GUI, so I guess I can roll an
> exten
+1, would be great to have that there.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Oh, yes, please. What a magnificent resource, both for provenance and
> bragging/blaming.
>
> The published limit is 1GB per repo, so 621MB should be fine. Even
> be
Any chance we could get a 1.4.0 release as well? GeoWebCache right now
looks like an abandoned project from many angles -
https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/
Like there it says that the release notes were updated for 1.3-RC3 over a
year ago.
Kevin, would you be up for trying to cut a rele
+1 here, sounds like a great step forward. Thanks for contributing the
server and time resources.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Cool,
> I guess we have enough consensus for us to move on with this.
> I will let you know once
Yeah, very cool. And yeah, I hadn't thought of that, but could be a cool
GeoNode feature - be able to see a map of all the holdings on that GeoNode.
A visual catalog that can be queried.
Could also be cool to have it on the root geoserver web page as an
openlayers map - give people a quick overvie
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> Do we have any interest in having Andrea sign this thing (
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API) as GeoServer project
>> officer or some such?
>>
>> Sorry I did not think o
Chris:
>
> We don't have any previous experience about collaborating and will start
> publishing the code on GitHub. Once the project is there, we'll notify to
> the list.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rafael Cruz Iglesias
> GeoMIX Office Director
> GeoSí Enterprise
&g
Hey Rafael, it sounds like a great contribution to GeoServer. One project I
work on (http://mapstory.org) actually could probably make great use of
this.
Do you have the code up on github? Would be great to see what the core
changes are. The first step is definitely to get on github, and then afte
need to support
> more than one layer). It seems your monitoring extension is using the new
> API (layers), but the GetLegendGraphic operation is not. Could you check
> this?
>
> Thanks.
> Mauro Bartolomeoli
>
>
>
> 2013/3/25 Chris Holmes
>
>> Hey all, on a pro
Hey all, on a production server (powering http://mapstory.org) we had
legend graphics just stop working. I'm not sure that it's even related to
an upgrade, as we haven't done one in awhile, and no one has done it in
awhile. We did get a weird corrupt data directory, and had to restore some
of the c
Definitely a great idea.
If the windows installer is easy that's great. But I think it also could be
sufficient to just prominently feature a little write up on 'testing
nightlies with windows', where we tell people how to call the .bat script
(I think we still include that in the binary download?
+1 on the module. And that agreement is definitely still valid.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Yancy Matherne
wrote:
> We received a copy of our fully executed code contribution agreement
> from Camille mid June of 2012. Would that still be valid?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yancy Matherne
> Software De
Was just talking on IRC to some GeoNode developers who want to provide
links to WCS for download of datasets. They were asking about a WCS
reflector, similar to the WMS one, to more easily get the full dataset.
So Justin helped out showing in the code where it could go. But Tom
Kralidis pointed ou
me release. And if anyone spots more errors we can
obviously fix them on the published version - there's a whole lot there, so
could have missed stuff.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> I'm reading
I'm reading it now. One question, do we want to call it 2.3-beta1 instead
of 2.3-beta? I think that's what we've done with most all the past ones. Or
is this going to be our only beta release?
I can make the change, and am happy to hit 'publish' after I do.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Andr
+1 - definitely should just offer the proper http way, instead of having
two options.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I was having a look at this bug report
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5530
> and I'm wondering if we should just drop that output format.
>
>
Apologies for the slow response, some comments inline.
> you doing all of the OpenLS services? Or just a subset? I feel like
>> there's five or six, though I'm not sure if they're all useful. I think
>> the most interesting ones to a wider audience are geocoding and routing.
>>
>
> Yes, they de
Welcome back!
Mauro, have you ever looked at UTFGrid stuff?
See http://mapbox.com/developers/utfgrid/ and there's a link to the spec
there.
And http://mapbox.com/demo/visiblemap/ shows it in action and explains
what's going on. It strikes me as very similar to your imagemap extension.
But I thin
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jonathan Moules
> wrote:
> > Wikipedia is also out of date a couple of days ago. The version was
> 2.2.x; I
> > updated it to 2.2.3 but not the release date.
> > I've updated it with 2.2.4 and the release date.
55 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote:
>
>> Chris holmes wrote:
>> >Out of curiosity, why is this so bad? I mean it complies to pure java
>> bytecode, could just be thought of an
>> > additional library, like the xml stuff we do. It'll interoperate on any
>> pla
+1 here, sounds great. Glad to see the timed release model rolling out.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Christian Mueller wrote:
> +1 for branching, makes sense.
>
> 2013/1/21 Andrea Aime
>
>> Hi all,
>> during today's PSC/PMC meeting there was some agreement to branch off
>> master
>> today
Welcome! And thanks for your praise, on behalf of all who have worked on
GeoServer.
That's great you get to join the community with this contract. And OpenLS
would be a cool improvement to have as modules on GeoServer. Are you doing
all of the OpenLS services? Or just a subset? I feel like there's
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>>
>> This approach makes a lot of sense. Indeed we already have a
>> mode=download I think for KML, but might make sense to just return KMZ with
>> the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:38 AM, David Winslow wrote:
> It is an interesting problem. I think it's pretty much a lost cause to
> try and make stable URLs for dynamic icons in general - feature data,
> styles, and external resources like icon graphics are all things that might
> change between th
So I've been hearing a few different use cases around processing, and
wanted to get a discussion going on the possibilities for some GeoServer
improvements that could improve our story.
One is to be able to more fully define layers defined by processes on the
fly. Right now we have the rendering t
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
>
>> +1 - awesome work. And I'd love to see it in 2.3.x
>>
>> Was there a reason other than lack of time to not make the jdbc
>> connection easier to u
+1
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> +1
>
> I would like to have this functionality.
>
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Alessio Fabiani
> @alfa7691
> Founder/T
+0
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> +1
>
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Alessio Fabiani
> @alfa7691
> Founder/Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via P
+1. I can think of some interesting ways this stuff could evolve, that will
warrant a lot more discussion. I'm curious to learn more about EO and if
there is more that makes sense to try to make generic. But no matter what
this feels like a step in a better direction, and sounds like a cool
capabil
+1 - awesome work. And I'd love to see it in 2.3.x
Was there a reason other than lack of time to not make the jdbc connection
easier to use? Like it seems to be a much more user friendly way would be
to let users first have an option choose a datastore connection they've
already established, inste
Hey, apologies for the late reply on this stuff. And for not properly
running with the translation testing and documentation - I tried to step up
for it a few months ago, right as I thought I'd have a lot more time, but
other stuff came up which took far more of my time than expected.
So let's not
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>>
>> Asked folks at OpenPlans and they said:
>>
>> *Yes, we legally changed our name to OpenPlans, Inc a couple of years
>> ago, so if the copyright was assigned to TOPP it should be a
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Davide wrote:
>>
>>> Nested layer groups could replace usage of layers WMS Path property.
>>>
>>
>> Could is key here. If we do it, Chris alr
> 2) Review of New York City, States and Tasmania data distributed with
>> GeoServer.
>>
>
> Done for the most part, the only one data that we don't have confirmation
> about is
> States, asked around, while people believe it's Census data we have no
> direct
> confirmation. Chris, I believe the da
+1 for me. It's a nice iterative improvement forward.
Does wms path then go away with this? I hope so, it was one of the least
intuitive pieces of config we had, as you had to set up a couple things
right to achieve what you wanted. Or do you need the next step that you
allude to in order to have
Definitely agree on KML using layer bboxes the same way everything
else does. This is not the place to solve the issue, KML should use
whatever bbox for the whole layer that we normally use. If we do some
cool dynamic bbox improvements for that later then it could use it.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1
Just a quick announcement for those who haven't seen the blog post on
training - http://blog.geoserver.org/2012/11/12/geoserver-trainings/
There's a new section of the website for training, see
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/Training
And at OpenGeo we're putting on a web-based Advanced GeoServ
xt week. It only covers functionality in
GeoServer or extensions.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> > I suppose one rule could be that the training has to be straight
> GeoServer.
> > Nothing about 'extra
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> > Hey guys, wanted to figure out what's kosher for promoting an online
> > training we're doing on 'Advanced GeoServer' -
> > http://geoserver.eve
Hey guys, wanted to figure out what's kosher for promoting an online
training we're doing on 'Advanced GeoServer' -
http://geoserver.eventbrite.com/ on November 19th
Was thinking we could do something similar to our jobs postings, where we
give a day or two for anyone on the list to respond with w
To prevent downloads could change the page at
http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoServer+2.2.1 to not have any links,
just say 'coming soon'.
I can do it for you, but want to be sure you're not like 20 minutes away
from release.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@
Hey, I just found
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/developer/tools.html#java
Which says 1.5 or above.
But http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/production/java.html has a
note that 2.2.x requires java 6.
Just want to confirm, we should update those docs, no?
I may be able to do it, or can
Awesome! Thanks Alessio, and GeoSolutions for contributing the time.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm going to start the GeoServer 2.2.1 Release process.
>
> Regards,
> Alessio.
>
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Oscar Fonts wrote:
> 2012/10/22 Chris Holmes :
> > Should I be able to just run that script on a geoserver checkout and then
> > have it wired to the geoserver_test project? And be able to pull down
> > updates from the transifex server? I&#x
#x27;d probably want to do some commit that changes all language files over
the transifex defaults, no? So that we'd just do a commit that changes a
number of them over to iso-8859-1?
>
> Oscar.
>
>
>
> 2012/10/18 Chris Holmes :
> > Ok, Frank's given me permis
tribute to GeoServer translations, with no knowledge
of code. And then it'd just take a few minutes from a developer to create a
git pull request, and then even less time for a committer to review and
pull it in.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> Hey, so at OpenGeo we&#
Hey, so at OpenGeo we've been having some good experiences with Transifex,
using it for our GeoNode project.
We're still in a pretty sad state of translations relative to 1.x (I think
we had 7 or 8 by the time we closed out 1.7.x, and we're at 4 right now in
2.x), and I think the type of tooling o
Awesome work guys, definitely +1 here.
One small thing - it'd be good to update the proposal to reflect that
junit4 was chosen. It now reads a bit too speculative, and it'd be good to
have the full decision trial made in it, like a bit of why junit4 was
chosen (sounds like the two were super compa
>
>
>
> 2) Loading the version specific docs on docs.geoserver.org and editing
> the docs home page:
>
> http://docs.geoserver.org/
> http://docs.geoserver.org/2.2.0/
>
> I see value in both of them, so my question is: should they be added as
> steps to the release process, or should we sto
===
> Filter Operations:
> ==
>
> Overview : The filter capabilities is imported from OGC 09-026r1/ISO 1914.
> The minimum requirement stated in the SOS 2.0 specification:
>
> Spatial Filter Opertor : BBOX
> Temporal Filter : TEquals operator in conjunction with the
Awesome! Great work Andrea.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> just wanted to share some nice screenshots. Here they are:
>
> [image: Inline image 3]
>
> (a lot of resuls cut)
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> Beautiful, aren't they? The CSW implementation is passing the C
Another library you might refer to and potentially incorporate is
https://code.google.com/p/ows-service-framework/
Mike Botts, who lead spec development of SWE stuff, has been building up
that library. And we've talked with him a few times about eventually
incorporating it in to the GeoServer/GeoT
Me too.
Andreas - is there somewhere that this object structure is documented? And
is that structure going to remain the same for OL 3?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Agree with Andreas observations about Describe operations complianc
Sorry for the extremely late sounding in on this thread, but I came across
it and have a few thoughts.
First off, great work on this initial implementation Andrea. I just tried
it out with a nightly from master, and it's cool to have the capability to
turn things off. Realizing that I'm not talkin
To reiterate a bit - in GeoServer we aren't trying to replace GeoNetwork,
to be a full catalog 'solution'. We just want to expose GeoServer holdings
as CSW. So one would use something like GeoNetwork in a full SDI that
requires full metadata and complex editing of that and aggregating many
services
+1 - would love to see Jukka on the PSC, he's definitely been one of the
most helpful users on the list for many years.
/me hopes he accepts.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alessio Fabiani <
alessio.fabi...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> +1
>
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi
Yeah, no concern here, I'm +1 to just go for it with 8.1. My 8.0.1 was just
an alternate suggestion, I'm definitely good with 8.1.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> And the idea is that two minor releases in one
8.0.1 seems reasonable to me? Doesn't feel extreme after 15 days, and
represents some minor improvements/fixes. And doesn't make us do some weird
geoserver specific tag.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> with the "time boxed" release model proposal it was stressed how i
+1. Great work Gabriel, and nice work by others to raise concerns and help
improve it. It's always cool to see open source in action.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> +1
>
> And kudos for the complete / easiest to follow proposal
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Tuesday, 7 Augu
One minor thing I noticed during 2.2 testing is that our Jetty hasn't
been upgraded in probably 4 years. I see it as version 6.1.8. Jetty is
up to version 8 these days, in stable releases.
Definitely not something to do between rc1 and 2.2.0. But perhaps
worth investigating on trunk? There may be
Just did some basic sanity checking. .dmg and .bin both work fine for
me. As did the html docs.
One super minor thing, on the sourceforge release there's this file:
geoserver-2.2-RC1-doc.zip What is that supposed to be? It's 22 bytes
large and doesn't seem to do anything.
Great work on th
Yup. Sorry for missing that email, sounds great.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Chris Holmes
> wrote:
> > For this case in particular, if we want to move faster, I feel
> comfortable
> > approving the porting of all
Hey, apologies for a bit of a delay on response to this.
So for me TOPP is just the entity that holds copyright, and it's up to the
PSC to decide any changes to that copyright. So I don't think I'd feel
comfortable with any OpenGeo employee saying it's ok, unless it's the
express wish of the PSC.
Hey, apologies for a bit of a delay on response to this.
So for me TOPP is just the entity that holds copyright, and it's up to the
PSC to decide any changes to that copyright. So I don't think I'd feel
comfortable with any OpenGeo employee saying it's ok, unless it's the
express wish of the PSC.
Ah, I didn't see that Jody's had an actual day, was thinking it was
just the time.
Let's do the monday, so we're not getting in to the weekend for Australians.
I have to check my conference schedule, may be helping give a workshop
right then, but let's just get things rolling.
On Tue, May 8, 201
Ok, let's keep moving on this.
I think we should stick with the 'voice' idea and see if we can get it
to work. We can complement with an etherpad to take real time notes on
all that is said, so we have a transcript. And a chat window (irc or
an integrated webex one) to drop links and so people who
+1 on all this.
Perhaps two GSIP's should come out of this? One for the release model
/ schedule. And then another for automation improvements? Or perhaps
we don't need a GSIP for that, but should get a jira and a plan of
attack for it.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Alessio Fabiani
wrote:
> Hi
I do like text records. I think one thing that could work well would
be to etherpad it, so a few people can take relevant notes at once.
Then we can post that etherpad transcript to the blog when we're done.
I'd be happy to try to take lead on writing, as long as there'd be a
couple backups for whe
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
