Re: [Geoserver-devel] ArcSDE 9.3 SP1 store in GeoServer 2.1.1

Right, you need to install the ArcSDE Java SDK that comes with your ArcGIS installation media, and after that install the service pack. If the service pack itself doesn't come with one of the jars it might be because it doesn't need to replace it, but not sure. Cheers, Gabriel On Fri, 2011-07-01 a

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Death of KML scheduled for next week?

One thing I think I could volunteer for is in splitting kml as a separate module. So that a first "downgrade" step would be moving it to extension. Then if no maintainer steps up we could downgrade it to community. A first step towards "improving" the kml story was made while the wms refactoring by

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GWC related capabilities links gone from the GS home page?

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:36 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > is there a reason why the GWC related caps links (WMTS, WMS-C and so > on) are no > more visible in the GeoServer home page? my checkout is at r16035 and the caps links are there, and they should. I'm weary of updating right now due to

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer on a diet: loose 6-7MB in a day

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 08:58 -0600, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Great work, thanks for doing that Andrea. Now I know who to go to when > I need to drop a few pounds :) > > > I agree letting the changes settle a bit on trunk before a backport > makes sense. ++ thanks Andrea. > > > > On Thu, Jun

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geoserver-users] Restrict WMS Output formats

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:15 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > I'm up to implement this. Question is what would be preferable, a new > > list property in WMSInfo for the blacklisted mime types, or just use the > &

Re: [Geoserver-devel] textareas too large?

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 10:13 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > It may be just me but my preference would be that the textareas in the > > UI were a bit less tall. > > I'd like to apply the following patch to the css,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geoserver-users] Restrict WMS Output formats

pinions? Cheers, Gabriel On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:09 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > JIRA created: <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4592> > > Cheers, > Gabriel > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:59 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Chris Holmes

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 60: WMS time and elevation support

Interesting. Not much to add, the proposal seems concise and solid enough. To be fancy we could let the "time" property be an expression and not just a single property name. I'm already +1 though. For the record, the proposal is actually here:

[Geoserver-devel] revamp of geosearch extension

Hi all, this is just a little notice that I'm about to commit a revamp of the geosearch extension soon, later today or tomorrow morning, so if anyone has a concern this would be the time to speak up. The rationale is that Google changed the way it indexes kml sitemaps. In the past, it liked them

[Geoserver-devel] something very strange going on with PostGIS DataStore

as creepy as the subject is, I've just configured a postgis datastore on a trunk's instance, added a layer and went browse it with the openlayers preview. After a little while it complained with "Unable to obtain connection" exception. NOTE: the datastore is configured with "validate connections"

[Geoserver-devel] StyledLayerDescriptor.xsd extension

Hey Andrea, as you've been maintaining the geoserver specific extensions to the SLD xsd, here's a patch to the xsd shipped with geoserver so that parameter substitution [1] validates. Let me know if that seems good. cheers, Gabriel [1]

[Geoserver-devel] really, nobody fills any metadata

Do you need any more proof? Two things I'd like to get done: - A global metadata settings page at GeoServer's first start up - Some special token in the capabilities documents tha

Re: [Geoserver-devel] how to add publicly accessible REST resource

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Andrea Aime > wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > what do I have to do if want to add a resource under /rest/ > that's > > p

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Community modules and the whole development process

Well, I think it could result in an explosion of publicly available prototypes, since anyone would be able to work on his own public repo without having to request commit access to svn, and able to say hey, if you wanna try my module, just pull from this url. And you can as easily branch out your r

[Geoserver-devel] how to add publicly accessible REST resource

Hey all, what do I have to do if want to add a resource under /rest/ that's publicly accessible through GET method? right now it looks like the only way is adding an exception in main module's applicationSecurityContext.xml like in: /rest/geosearch/**=anonymousProcessingFilter,consoleExceptionTra

[Geoserver-devel] Community modules and the whole development process

Hey, so this is my concern wrt community modules: IMHO the whole concept of having community modules in the mainstream svn repo is obsolete. I don't quite remember if we already discussed it, but for how long are we going to keep tied to svn? Moving to git is a natural step forward IMHO and it'd

Re: [Geoserver-devel] community module request

Hi Jose, glad to hear from you. The proposed work certainly looks interesting, and I'm +1 on a community module for it. Question is: what stage is the work at? from what you say it looks like it's still on the "planning" stage? or is there some development already as a prototype? So I'm +1 with

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Direct GWC WMS integration breaks control flow (and possibly other callbacks)

Hi Andrea, yes, the reason for calling the dispatcher instead of using WebMapService directly is that gwc requests don't run our of control-flow control. Unfortunately this has always been the case and hence I thought it was alright and never really dig deep into how well they were interacting. I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS insert transaction events

I'd rather avoid. TIA, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:39 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > > May be the easiest way forward would be for the > > > TransactionPlugin.afterTransaction(TransactionType request, boolean > > > committed) method to also receive th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] No time for release this week

doh, hope you get better soon. And enjoy the break :) best, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:44 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > I am sorry to hear that Andrea. I hope its not too painful and best of luck > > with the recovery. > > Than

Re: [Geoserver-devel] WFS insert transaction events

> > May be the easiest way forward would be for the > > TransactionPlugin.afterTransaction(TransactionType request, boolean > > committed) method to also receive the TransactionResponseType response > > so implementations can get to the InsertResultsType and grab the list of > > inserted feature id

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GWC and Spring 3.0.5

Hi Christian, migrating gwc to Spring 3 sounds good to me. If you feel like providing a patch that'd be great, cause I'm not sure when I'll be able to do that myself. For sure not before next week, though next week I think I could. We use github:https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache Or, to m

[Geoserver-devel] WFS insert transaction events

Hey all, I'm looking for a bit of advise on how to get what I need out from the insert transaction events, which is no more than a transaction listener/plugin to know the actual inserted features or at least its feature ids. Right now it looks like there's no way for a transaction listener to get

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] Avoid unneded exceptions in DataUtilities.defaultValue when rendering a coverage

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 21:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > sorry for the cross-posting. > > > > I wonder what you think of explaining > > org.geotools.data.DataUtilities.defaultValue th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] No release today

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:53 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Just a question that I should already know but am uncertain: > > Is the floor open on 2.1.x to add new stuff? like in for > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GE

Re: [Geoserver-devel] No release today

Just a question that I should already know but am uncertain: Is the floor open on 2.1.x to add new stuff? like in for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4538. I suppose after 2.1.0 2.1.1 will come and some new stable/non breaking functionality is gonna be allowed, right? On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 1

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer HomePageContentProvider?

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:10 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to introduce a new extension point for modules to provide extra > > content to the geoserver home page, just like > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer HomePageContentProvider?

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:57 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to introduce a new extension point for modules to provide extra > content to the geoserver home page, just like > CapabilitiesHomePageLinkProvider does for the getcapabilities panel. > > The

[Geoserver-devel] GeoServer HomePageContentProvider?

Hi all, I'd like to introduce a new extension point for modules to provide extra content to the geoserver home page, just like CapabilitiesHomePageLinkProvider does for the getcapabilities panel. The interface would be pretty much the same: public interface HomeContentProvider { public Compon

[Geoserver-devel] Avoid unneded exceptions in DataUtilities.defaultValue when rendering a coverage

Hi all, sorry for the cross-posting. I wonder what you think of explaining org.geotools.data.DataUtilities.defaultValue that AbstractGridCoverage2DReader and GeneralParameterValue are valid arguments to that function and hence it should return null instead of throwing IllegalArgumentException. T

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [geowebcache-users] Access Violation Exception when Seeding

Hi, first off, sorry for the cross-posting. Sherwin it's ok to ask here at the gwc-users mailing list. I'm cc'ing the geoserver-devel list in case some developer already faced this kind of problem with native JAI/ImageIO. Our friend here is getting the following VM crashes when gwc tries to decode

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: cite-wfs-1.1-trunk #257

Justin, as you know more about the cite set up, when you have a chance could you dig into what's making it fail? I don't think it is gwc crashing at startup for layers with no default style set, as that should be fixed, the wcs cite succeeded, and now the wfs cite seems to have ran but failed inst

Re: [Geoserver-devel] PropertyDataStore changes break GeoServer build? Re: Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #3836

Hi again, looks like it was a regression. Fix committed at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3540 Please verify before closing the issue? Cheers, Gabriel On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 14:20 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > Hey Jody, could you check whether the following commit is responsible > f

[Geoserver-devel] PropertyDataStore changes break GeoServer build? Re: Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #3836

ies files for the test suites? Cheers, Gabriel On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:27 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > build is failing at org.vfny.geoserver.ProjectionPolicyTest in main? > > I'll give it a quick check and see if something obvious is breaking it > > On Mon, 2011-04-25

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #3836

build is failing at org.vfny.geoserver.ProjectionPolicyTest in main? I'll give it a quick check and see if something obvious is breaking it On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:20 +, Hudson wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [groldan] GEOS-

Re: [Geoserver-devel] permission to add new test dependency

y useful. So I really don't see a reason not to use it, as it allows me to writ tons of unit tests in a pretty straight forward way? Cheers, Gabriel > > > 2c. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Gabrie

[Geoserver-devel] permission to add new test dependency

Hey all, I would need to merge a couple patches to the GWC module, that will result in fixing the cite build failures. But before doing that I wanted to ask whether there's any inconvenient in adding a new _test_ scoped dependency over the Moskito library . It's a 1.4MB jar t

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:38 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > I'm going to back port some upgrades to the INSPIRE community module. > > As it's not part of the build I don't think there should be a problem > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

r 19, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > hey sorry for the delay, I'm making the tag right away, hope we're still > > in time. > > Err... saw the commit going in, but I'm left with one hour or so of work so > it's not even enough time to do one of th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Allowing first, very light pluggability of user authentication source

+1! On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:09 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:55 PM, wrote: > > At a first look I see no big problems here, especially since I do not intend > > to backport to 2.1.x. I really would like to migrate to Spring 3.x on trunk > > and use Spring Security 3.x,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:14 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:08 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2011-

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:24 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > e, it's lighter than geosever's anyway. > > would that work? are you planning waiting until tomorrow for RC5 or you > > think you'll tag today? if so

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:08 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking > >&

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Pre-RC5 todo list

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:00 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking around and I see at least two, maybe three things blocking > the RC5 release: > - overnight the dependency towards GWC was moved to SNAPSHOT again > with a commit log saying "set GWC dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT to > catch up

[Geoserver-devel] output formats blacklisting

Hey all, just a quick thought. If we finally implement some sort of control for what WMS/WFS output formats are enabled, should it be in the form of a black list or a white list? I think if someone wants to limit the available output formats at all white list would make more sense? say he upgrad

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spurious http session creation, patches ready, what to do vs 2.1.0?

;d like to apply to 2.1.x after 2.1.0 is out too. For the sake of simplicity, I left a single applicationSecurityContextTest.xml in main/src/test/java instead of having to create separate ones for each test that relies on the security features. Cheers, Gabriel On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:57 -0300

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spurious http session creation, patches ready, what to do vs 2.1.0?

On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 21:23 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:30 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Gabriel Roldán > >> wrote: > >> > You m

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spurious http session creation, patches ready, what to do vs 2.1.0?

On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 16:30 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > You may be able to bring some light over the following: > > While testing this I found it seems impossible to get really rid of the > > default geoserver sec

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spurious http session creation, patches ready, what to do vs 2.1.0?

should move everything in web/app/src/main/java to web-core, but let web-app just decide on the bean weaving. makes sense, or am I missing something obvious? cheers, Gabriel On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 21:39 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > &

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Spurious http session creation, patches ready, what to do vs 2.1.0?

On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > following up a report of GeoServer creating thousands of http sessions > during "normal" operation I've built a tool to investigate the session > creations and a patch that solves the session creations I've noticed. > > The tool is a se

Re: [Geoserver-devel] cql handling in 2.1

sounds good to me. On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 14:38 -0600, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Cool, thanks for the clarification Andrea. > > > I do think we should try to be as backwards compatible as possible. > And in this case I don't think we really give up anything falling back > to the old CQL parser. U

[Geoserver-devel] RequestObjectLogger

Hey Justin, would you mind applying the bellow patch to RequestObjectLogger in order not to generate too many strings when not needed? I tested it by switching between geosever_developer and production logging while running a gwc seed task and it seems it does its job. The performance penalty for t

Re: [Geoserver-devel] RC4 on pace for mid week

Glad to hear that, sounds good to me. On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:08 -0600, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > > All the fixes/regressions that affected RC3 have been resolved so > things are on pace for RC4 release mid week. We are just working out > with geotools if we want to put out a corre

[Geoserver-devel] geowebcache dependency versions

Hello, with the increasing development in gwc it's no longer sustainable to keep both geoserver's trunk and its stable branch both depending gwc's trunk/master branch. Hence, following the release of gwc 1.2.5 I've created a "stable" 1.2.x gwc branch, and I'm going to get geoserver 2.1.x depend on

Re: [Geoserver-devel] RC4 early next week?

sounds good to me too. I'll add the quota disablement flag in time, and can help with the release process. Gabriel On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 17:34 +0200, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > I think that sounds good. > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:4

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Getting two GeoServer running against the same data dir... not possible in RC3+?

Or rather if you don't want the metastore and are already using the disable metastore key you probably don't want/can't afford diskquota either, so we could just assume that? I'm open to suggestions. Cheers, Gabriel On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 00:04 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: &g

Re: [Geoserver-devel] commits to gwc on stable branch

I understand. So I'll branch 2.1.x on svn and revert that commit out. Sorry again for the hassle. On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 20:47 -0600, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > ok, sorry about th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Getting two GeoServer running against the same data dir... not possible in RC3+?

uh, oh, sigh. so far so good for iterative development. Though the end goal is to be able to do real clustering this is a big inconvenient indeed meanwhile. I guess the easiest way out would be an extra env var to completely disable diskquota just like you have to do to disable the metastore? On W

Re: [Geoserver-devel] commits to gwc on stable branch

ok, sorry about the lack of discussion. It looks like I misunderstood the state of things wrt 2.1.x cause I really thought with rc3 out we were ok to backport stable stuff. Today's commit is part of a two commit that we need for tomorrow's deadline so that GeoNode can depend on 2.1.x, which was no

[Geoserver-devel] MetadataMap.remove(String key) not supported

Is there a reason for MetadataMap.remove(String key) doing nothing instead of removing the specified key from the subject map? If not, can I just update it as: public Serializable remove(Object key) { return map.remove(key); } Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan grol...@opengeo.org Exper

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer now depending on sleepycat embeeded db? Now three embedded databases in the classpath

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:41 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > I guess it depends on what you call the same job. Serving static > > contents like in the epsg database case doesn't seem to be _the_ same > > job than

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer now depending on sleepycat embeeded db? Now three embedded databases in the classpath

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 11:50 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:23 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Hi, > >> today I've noticed this startup error: > >> > >&

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1-RC3?

unds good. So to sum up I will start the 2.1-RC3 > release tomorrow (Tuesday, Mar 22 western time). > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 13:54 -0400, Chris Holmes wrote: > > We could do a true RC on the time frame

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Are we going to release 2.1 with a snapshot dependency to GWC?

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > since the plan is to release 2.1-RC3 today and make it into the final > unchanged > next week if no regression pops up... shouldn't we depend on some tagged > (if not released) version of GeoWebCache? Indeed that'd be good. I'm about t

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer now depending on sleepycat embeeded db? Now three embedded databases in the classpath

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:23 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > today I've noticed this startup error: > > 22 mar 10:14:43 WARN [mortbay.log] - Nested in > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error > The error per se was quickly solved by updating my eclipse project. > But I'm w

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk #3679

Don't panic, checking what's going on (so many local branches...) On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 14:56 +, Hudson wrote: > See > -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Getting nuts trying to encode custom made complex features

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:03 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > Glad you found a working setup. I did spend some time over the weekend > > working with the extension you sent out but unfortunately did not get very > > far. I experimented wit

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1-RC3?

On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 13:54 -0400, Chris Holmes wrote: > We could do a true RC on the time frame you propose. So put it out, > wait one week, if there are no blocker bugs then just take the exact > same thing and call it 2.1.0 > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #3355

That was expected while I committed the changes to adjust to some gwc changes, but it was just taking me longer than expected to double check everything's alright before committing the fix. I'm about to commit the fix as soon as my local build finishes. Gabriel On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 11:41 +0800,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] some sidebar reorginazation

That's because you use nice screens Andrea :) I'm tired of scrolling down when on laptop. Which makes me think Layer Preview should make its way into the home page. Either as a link to the LayerPreview page or as a list of the N most visited layers? back to the topic, I like Rollie's proposal, and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Shutting down old GeoServer documentation (GEOSDOC)

> what about > just locking down that space to authorized users and hide it from the > rest of the > world instead? +1 Gabriel. > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- Gabriel Roldan grol...@opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers -

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Multiple rendering requests for a single WMS call

scary as it sounds I dont't seem to be able of reproducing. Simone can you send a request against the default nurc:mosaic layer that makes this happen? I'd be certainly surprised that rendering is called twice for a single request and can't think of a reason for that to happen, but in any case wil

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GS 2.1.0 RC1 + GWC

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 20:57 +0530, Steve Way wrote: > Hi There, > > > > Is there any way of removing GWC from GeoServer before deployment? > shutting down tomcat once geoserver.war is deployed and deleting *gwc* from WEB-INF/lib works for me. You probably deleted only gwc* and got web-gwc.jar

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Connection pool for ArcSDE store

Hi Mathieu, it's not a known problem, sorry to hear that. What is the backend database? Could you explain how you're running the load test? if it's some kind of script that's easy to run it'd be great if you can share it so I can reproduce the issue more easily and see what's going wrong. In the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x and trunk builds down

sky is clear now again. Cheers, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 12:37 -0300, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > sigh, sorry about that. Working on it. > I've changed a GWC class member from public to private (encapsulated it) > and didn't realize I'd need to use the new accessors in g

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 2.1.x and trunk builds down

sigh, sorry about that. Working on it. I've changed a GWC class member from public to private (encapsulated it) and didn't realize I'd need to use the new accessors in geoserver too, then ran out to party for my birthday. back from that I'll fix it right away. Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 08:10

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Extension point for GetCapabilities links in home page

branching 2.1.x from current trunk since nothing to > core and considered risk has taken place. And then just keep with our > definition of stable for what gets backported to 2.1.x branch. > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > Good q

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Extension point for GetCapabilities links in home page

svn it looks like > there's a RC1 tag, but not a 2.1.x branch yet. I think this is a > great patch for trunk/2.2.x, to be backported for 2.1.0, but I was > hoping RC1 would be a real Release Candidate - become 2.1.0 if there > were no major bugs. > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Extension point for GetCapabilities links in home page

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 10:53 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As per http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4162, I worked out a patch > > that incorporates an extension point for contributing to the &

[Geoserver-devel] Extension point for GetCapabilities links in home page

Hi all, As per http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4162, I worked out a patch that incorporates an extension point for contributing to the getcapabilities links in the home page. You can see the diff at There's

Re: [Geoserver-devel] starting 2.1-RC1 release

final gs 2.1. Cheers, Gabriel > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > Cool. btw, I just tagged geowebcache trunk accordingly since > gs trunk > depends on gwc trunk snapshot. > > Cheers, > Gabriel >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] starting 2.1-RC1 release

Cool. btw, I just tagged geowebcache trunk accordingly since gs trunk depends on gwc trunk snapshot. Cheers, Gabriel On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 22:38 -0700, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > > Unless there are any objections I hope to start the 2.1-RC1 release > early western time tomorrow. Howe

Re: [Geoserver-devel] nurc:pk50095 doesn't load properly in tomcat

On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 08:35 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Chris Holmes wrote: > > Hmmm... So there's nothing we can do to code around it at the GeoServer or > > GeoTools level. > > > > How about we just remove that layer from the default data? It seems to be > > t

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServerApplication_de.properties and UTF-8

I use the eclipse resource bundle editor. It takes care of escape sequences besides being a cool .properties translator helper. Gabriel. On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:20 +0100, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote: > Uah > > The translation property files are loaded in this manner > > InputStream

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Generic cartesian CRS: code zero?

chiming in late due to vacations. The idea is sound and needed. I'm wondering if there's any conceptual difference between your EPSG:0 CRS and the CRS:1 special CRS defined in the WMS 1.3 spec (see section 6.7.2 and 6.7.3.5). If there's not we should use CRS:1, but I think there is a difference in

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Problem with ArcSDEGridCoverage2DReaderJAI

That's a defect fixed just a couple weeks ago. Try a nightly build: That should fix it. Otherwise please tell me. Cheer

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Direct GWC/WMS integration

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 21:38 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > >> This is imperative for the WMS performance shootout, always removed GWC > >> entirely > >> to prove that no caching was going on (or was possible) in

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Direct GWC/WMS integration

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 18:54 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > as per http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4163, there's now the > > possibility of directly integrating GWC with the regular WMS,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] CITE failure help [Re: Build failed in Hudson: cite-wms-1.1-trunk #136]

couldn't run the suite through jetty. > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Gabriel Roldán > wrote: > I fixed the cite failure I recognized as my fault (empty > VendorSpecificCapabilities), but now when I run it locally it > the > following as

[Geoserver-devel] Direct GWC/WMS integration

Hi all, as per http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-4163, there's now the possibility of directly integrating GWC with the regular WMS, providing WMS-C capabilities directly out of the GeoServer WMS: * There's the possibility to enable direct GWC WMS integration through the UI (disa

[Geoserver-devel] CITE failure help [Re: Build failed in Hudson: cite-wms-1.1-trunk #136]

I fixed the cite failure I recognized as my fault (empty VendorSpecificCapabilities), but now when I run it locally it the following assertion fails: Test wms:wmsops-getcapabilities-params-request-1 (wms-1.1.1/d40e1042_1) Assertion: When REQUEST is "capabilities", then the response is capabiliti

[Geoserver-devel] CITE failure help Re: Build failed in Hudson: cite-wms-1.1-trunk #136

CITE WMS 1.1.1 is failing du On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 06:47 +, Hudson wrote: > See > > -- > [...truncated 1147 lines...] > VAR_SIZE_1: 188

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools change breaks GeoServer? Re: Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-online #352

http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini > http://twitter.com/simogeo > > --- > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote: > > Thanks Simone and Andrea. > > > > So, if I r

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoTools change breaks GeoServer? Re: Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-online #352

Thanks Simone and Andrea. So, if I read correctly, with your change there should be absolutely no behavior change, just that the gtiff writer will properly report bounds, whether the original data comes with center pixel or corner pixel bounds? Cheers, Gabriel On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:21 +0100,

[Geoserver-devel] extend ExtendedCapabilitiesProvider for WMS 1.1.1

Hi Justin, all, I am working on tighter gwc/wms integration and found myself in the need to use ExtendedCapabilitiesProvider for WMS 1.1.1, in order for the geoserver gwc module to be able of contributing to the WMS 1.1.1 capabilities (well I could have hacked on the WMS module but this is nicer a

[Geoserver-devel] GeoTools change breaks GeoServer? Re: Build failed in Hudson: geoserver-trunk-online #352

The build failure at org.geoserver.wms.wms_1_3.CapabilitiesSystemTest.testValidateCapabilitiesXML() _seems_ to come from some recent change in some geotool's coverage class? The error message is: AssertionFailedError: WMS 1.3.0 capabilities validation error: cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '180.25'

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Request builders: is it time for a WCS one?

+1. Good stuff. Just wonder if we should put it under tools instead of demos? Cheers, Gabriel On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:12 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > during the last two days I've spent some hours trying to build > another request builder. > > Given the good success of the WPS one, and seei

Re: [Geoserver-devel] inspire community module

+1. No need for a GSIP. The changes needed for this to work were approved as part of GSIP-56. Cheers, Gabriel On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 21:06 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > > Hi all, > > In conjunction with the wms 1.3 work that is going on

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Returning proper HTTP error codes: epic failure?

The following from that URL looks like a nice and non invasive way of working around that for IE if you change "ISAPI filter" by "Servlet filter": "Method 3 Use an ISAPI filter that forces the content length of all HTTP 500 responses to be larger than 512 bytes, effectively padding all 500 respons

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Antique, odd behavior in GetMap requests handling

I'd say throw an exception. For lenient there's the reflector. On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:08 +0100, Alessio Fabiani wrote: > On my opinion we should just throw an exception since the parameter is > required. > > --- > Ing. Alessio Fabiani > Found

  1   2   3   >