Blog post looks good - thanks for the hard work.
I do see the blog post picked up everywhere by news anouncements. I wonder if
we can tone down the amount of email announcing we now do? The community does
seem to be supporting us in that respect.
I did notice from a couple of examples (this rel
I edited the blog post and hopefully made some improvements. Thanks for
writing this up.
Thanks,
Mike Pumphrey
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
On 5/25/2010 3:04 AM, v...@csiro wrote:
>
> Great!!!, thanks Andrea,
>
> This should be the final version to be uploaded and announced.
>
> To meet the gro
Great!!!, thanks Andrea,
This should be the final version to be uploaded and announced.
To meet the growing demand for a geospatial server that meets the open
standard set by the Open Geospatial Consortium, the GeoServer community have
worked hard to release the new GeoServer version 2.0.2 whic
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> Thanks Gabriel,
>
> So far this is what I have. Please do correct me or add in anything as
> neccessary.
>
>
> To meet the growing demand for a geospatial server that meets the open
> standard set by the Open Geospatial Consortium, the GeoServer community have
> worked h
Thanks Gabriel,
So far this is what I have. Please do correct me or add in anything as
neccessary.
To meet the growing demand for a geospatial server that meets the open
standard set by the Open Geospatial Consortium, the GeoServer community have
worked hard to release the new GeoServer version
On 5/24/10 6:52 AM, v...@csiro wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone :)
>
> I need some suggestions on what people wish to be included in the blog for
> this release of GeoServer. Everyone have worked hard to add new features and
> bug fixes so now its time show off what you have done. Kindly let me know
> what
Hi Everyone :)
I need some suggestions on what people wish to be included in the blog for
this release of GeoServer. Everyone have worked hard to add new features and
bug fixes so now its time show off what you have done. Kindly let me know
what are the
New Feature: what have been done to make
I have tried that but the pdf turned out pretty bad in some places. Theres
alot of overlapping, tables not generating probably and some images not
showing.
Mike Pumphrey-2 wrote:
>
> I've found that in the interests of expediency, it is possible to create
> the PDF by powering through the er
I've found that in the interests of expediency, it is possible to create the
PDF by powering through the errors (just hitting Enter a bunch of times). It's
not great, but it works.
Medium term solution is to fix the image files (no GIFs, etc).
Thanks,
Mike Pumphrey
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.or
I am trying to get access to deploy the artifacts for the Geoserver2.0.2
release. Can anyone help out?
v...@csiro wrote:
>
> I am closing to finishing the deployment but my mvn deploy (done from src
> folder) return error saying system is offline.
>
> I have issues with creating the documenta
I am closing to finishing the deployment but my mvn deploy (done from src
folder) return error saying system is offline.
I have issues with creating the documentation as well, creating the pdf and
not to sure where to generate the html to get the desired file structure.
My pdflatex(MikeTex) is n
On 17/05/10 17:35, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Yeah, managed to reproduce the issue. For my limited knowledge of XML
> schema the bug is an actual one.
> I've attached the response I get from GeoServer.
> The Eclipse validator is also complaining about the document contents,
> and nicely reports the line
Just a quick update,
I have reran all tests and everything passed nicely except for wfs1.1.0.
The problem might stem from the app-schema resolver that Ben has been
working on so I will speak to him in the morning.
Andrea Aime-4 wrote:
>
> v...@csiro ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Running the CI
victor@csiro.au ha scritto:
Hi Andrea,
Thanks heaps :)
I think the only outstanding issue with wfs1.1.0 now is the following. I will
proceed with wcs then and come back to wfs1.1.0 :)
The missing was resolved when I rebuilt the CITE testing tool.
Request d1e27153_1:
Method: GET
U
ment before printing this email.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aa...@opengeo.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 5:06 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release
victor@csiro.au ha scritto:
victor@csiro.au ha scritto:
> The only one with issue is wfs1.1.0 and wcs-1.0 (cause I did not take out the
> wcs1_1.jar)
Cool. I'll try to reproduce the wfs 1.1.0 issues, in the meantime can
you rerun cite wcs 1.0 with the wcs 1.1. service out of the way?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
Op
interference.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aa...@opengeo.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 4:57 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
> provide some help?
Ah, btw, did you run the other test suites? Is this the only one giving
you trouble?
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight fr
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
> provide some help?
I'm doing the morning builds and then I can try to have a look at it.
Btw, if you need some prompt help the dev list is not the first place to
ask, IRC is definitely bette
Hi,
Running the CITE Test, I am stuck on the following error, can someone
provide some help?
Assertion: The Content-Type of all POST KVP-encoded request entities must be
'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'.
Request d1e4782_1:
Method: post
URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
Body:
nment before printing this email.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:aa...@opengeo.org]
Sent: Monday, 17 May 2010 2:16 PM
To: Tey, Victor (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer 2.0.2 release
v...@csiro ha scritto:
&
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now
Sorry but... are all CITE tests passing? We don't do releases with CITE
test failures (actually, with just one, for a test that does not make
sense, and happens only on postgres 8.3+, where a like compa
That is great; the geotools 2.6.4 deploy went out of the weekend and I will be
releasing off it shortly.
Note: this may mean we need to make a 2.6.5 later in the month when you are
ready.
Jody
On 17/05/2010, at 12:29 PM, v...@csiro wrote:
>
> I am going to start the building and tagging proc
I am going to start the building and tagging process of Geoserver now
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/GeoServer-2.0.2-release-tp28483026p28578925.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Gentle reminder that Geoserver will be tagged for release on 17th May 2010
assuming the build is fine
Jody Garnett-3 wrote:
>
> I am on it Andrea :-) I will deploy the jars and wait to hear back from
> both CITE tests and those trying out the artifacts.
>
> Jody
>
> On 11/05/2010, at 5:52
I am on it Andrea :-) I will deploy the jars and wait to hear back from both
CITE tests and those trying out the artifacts.
Jody
On 11/05/2010, at 5:52 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-)
>> So you have
I understand that we will be tagging Geotool and GeoServer for release and
will be doing all tests based on the tagged revision. Release will be made
on the tagged revision once all tests have passed :)
Andrea Aime-4 wrote:
>
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> There are release plans for 2.6.4; th
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-)
>
> So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x
> on friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
> I will warn the geotools list now.
Mind, if you release before CITE testing is
There are release plans for 2.6.4; this is why we are planning together :-)
So you have me to help make a GeoTools release this week; I can branch 2.6.x on
friday and deploy a 2.6.4.
I will warn the geotools list now.
Jody
On 11/05/2010, at 3:40 PM, v...@csiro wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am
v...@csiro ha scritto:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am Victor, working for CSIRO and will be doing the release for GeoServer
> 2.0.2 with Ben and Rini's help. Below will be tentatively the timeline for
> this release unless there are issues that forbids this. We will adjust the
> dates as necessary.
>
>
Hi Everyone,
I am Victor, working for CSIRO and will be doing the release for GeoServer
2.0.2 with Ben and Rini's help. Below will be tentatively the timeline for
this release unless there are issues that forbids this. We will adjust the
dates as necessary.
Now - 16th May 10 : Fin
I am going to try and make a uDig RC3 next week as well; so I am up for tagging
and build GeoTools.
Jody
On 07/05/2010, at 5:41 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> how about everyone starts testing nightlies next week (10 May). We
> (CSIRO) tag/build/upload on or about 17 May, and ever
Andrea,
how about everyone starts testing nightlies next week (10 May). We
(CSIRO) tag/build/upload on or about 17 May, and everybody tests the
release artifacts that week, and we announce the release on 21 May if
all goes to plan.
That would be the end of the week after next. Does that sound
Hi,
so when it is that the 2.0.2 release is scheduled?
Next week? The week after the next?
We should advise users to start hitting the nightly
build harder and fix whatever high profile bugs
are still lurking in the code base
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert serv
On 18/04/10 23:06, Jody Garnett wrote:
> That sounds good Ben; I can support you guys and do a geotools release in the
> same time period.
That would be good.
> We can also try and lurk on IRC if you have questions.
Thanks, we will appreciate the in-time-zone support.
I did get a taste of what
On 16/04/10 22:17, Chris Holmes wrote:
> Ben - it may make sense to start on it early the second week of may, so
> that there's time to get it out by the middle of may.
That sounds good to me, Chris.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and R
That sounds good Ben; I can support you guys and do a geotools release in the
same time period.
We can also try and lurk on IRC if you have questions.
Jody
On 16/04/2010, at 5:34 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Chris,
>
> the AuScope/SISS/ASRDC team at CSIRO would be pleased take our turn.
>
I think we should try do bi-monthly releases by rotation.
Follwowing this approach we can make another towards the end o the
summer and we (as in GeoSolutions) could take care of it.
Regards,
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.
Let's go with CSIRO for this release, in mid-may to allow for more GT
work to come in. Then GeoSolutions could do 2.0.3, or we could have
OpenGeo do 2.0.3 and GeoSolutions do 2.1-alpha? Or beta? Not sure if
it's ready, but we did branch so it could be nice to get a release, and
I think most
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> Chris,
>
> the AuScope/SISS/ASRDC team at CSIRO would be pleased take our turn.
>
> How about a release in mid-May?
Sounds good to me. We already have 65 jira issues closed and as Chris
said there are a few nasty ones in the lot:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/I
I can talk to the others and see when we can do it.
I would probably wait another 2-3 weeks in order to have a bit more
geotools work coming in.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 5
Chris,
the AuScope/SISS/ASRDC team at CSIRO would be pleased take our turn.
How about a release in mid-May?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 16/04/10 05:38, Chris Holmes wrote:
> So it's been awhile since we did a GeoServer release, and I know there
> have been some fairly critical bug fixes and some ni
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Lisasoft is pretty darn busy so I don't think Mark has time. We talked
> last release about alternating?
Correct. It has to be seen if we alternate in two, or four, or...
There might be other entities besides OpenGeo and Lisasoft that
want to contribute some release ti
Lisasoft is pretty darn busy so I don't think Mark has time. We talked
last release about alternating?
On 16/04/2010, at 7:38 AM, Chris Holmes wrote:
> So it's been awhile since we did a GeoServer release, and I know there
> have been some fairly critical bug fixes and some nice improvements
So it's been awhile since we did a GeoServer release, and I know there
have been some fairly critical bug fixes and some nice improvements.
Is anyone able to step up and put out a new stable release? I can have
OpenGeo do 2.0.3, but want to try to get a decent rotation, where we do
it once eve
45 matches
Mail list logo
