I will keep muddling along, I will try and get someone to test the release
artifacts before it is announced. So if is not announced by next thursday
you are welcome to volunteer :)
Jody Garnett
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 23-10-14 19:43, Jody Garnett wrote
On 23-10-14 19:43, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Agreed: GeoTools 12.0.1 and GeoServer 2.6.0.1.
>
> Richard if I make these artifacts are you in position to confirm the fix
> works (before I update the blog post and source forge downloads?)
Not untill next week thursday I'm afraid. The rest of the week I
Agreed: GeoTools 12.0.1 and GeoServer 2.6.0.1.
Richard if I make these artifacts are you in position to confirm the fix
works (before I update the blog post and source forge downloads?)
--
Jody
Jody Garnett
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:33 PM,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> Yeah this is why we requested help testing RC1 :(
>
> I am not sure if I should "release" a nightly, or checkout 2.6.0, apply
> the one fix (anyone have a link) and call it 2.6.1.
>
The fix is here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commi
Yeah this is why we requested help testing RC1 :(
I am not sure if I should "release" a nightly, or checkout 2.6.0, apply the
one fix (anyone have a link) and call it 2.6.1.
Jody
Jody Garnett
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 23-10-14 16:57, Andrea Aime wrote
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule
indicative but informative :)
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
> On 23-10-14 16:57, Andrea Aime wrote:
> > n Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
> > We upgraded to 2.6.0 (and still doing fine :-) ), but Oracle layers
> > performance is much lower compared to 2.4.3
> >
> >
On 23-10-14 16:57, Andrea Aime wrote:
> n Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
> We upgraded to 2.6.0 (and still doing fine :-) ), but Oracle layers
> performance is much lower compared to 2.4.3
>
> Can somebody help me with this, or confirm behaviour like this?
>
> Yes,
n Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We were running 2.4.3 here with some Oracle layers, all doing fine.
> Geoserver in Tomcat 7.0.56 on Windows (JRE7)
> It's a Oracle spatial 10.2.0.5.0 db on a different (linux?) server.
>
> We upgraded to 2.6.0 (and still doin
Hi,
We were running 2.4.3 here with some Oracle layers, all doing fine.
Geoserver in Tomcat 7.0.56 on Windows (JRE7)
It's a Oracle spatial 10.2.0.5.0 db on a different (linux?) server.
We upgraded to 2.6.0 (and still doing fine :-) ), but Oracle layers
performance is much lower compared to 2.4.3
10 matches
Mail list logo
