Thanks for letting us know, Mark. We look forward to your ongoing
contributions.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 27/07/12 11:40, Mark Leslie wrote:
I'm sorry for missing the last meeting, but I fell ill and just
couldn't be online.
I've been having a hard look at my involvement on the PSC and while I
Reminder: GeoServer/GeoTools meeting today (Monday 23 July) at 13:00 UTC.
On 11/07/12 13:47, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
At Monday's meeting, we discussed the GeoServer Project Steering
Committee. (Any GeoTools Project Management Committee review will be
held at a later data.)
The PSC rules
+1
:)
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 331
On 11/07/12 15:52, Alessio Fabiani wrote:
+1
:)
Ha ha!
(For the benefit of the list, Alessio *has* attended meetings, and this
vote is *not* his only activity, although it would be even funnier if it
were.)
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth
I am not sure about putting such an emphasis on the meetings as required to
show the necessary participation to be part of the PSC. Given we are
radically spread out across the globe it is not just doable for a lot of
people, but that doesn't mean they aren't active.
To me the biggest thing in
I second Justin here, although honestly my judgment is a bit biased
by the fact that attending meetings si going to be difficult for me in
some periods (like now).
While I am one of those who pushed to have regular meetings I believe
we should be careful on putting too much emphasis on them for
+1. Attending meetings is great if you can, but reviewing and voting on
proposals in both necessary and sufficient to be on the PSC.
I was thinking of people with family obligations when I wrote: It is
not mandatory to attend meetings, but it is mandatory to be active;
those who have other
