Re: [Geoserver-devel] Creating a new feature type and FeatureTypeInfo limitations

2010-03-19 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yup it is definitely a limitation that will need to be addressed. Although I don't think it is that outlandish for a first cut to just default column types to string with some preset length, and refine from there. On 3/18/10 12:42 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: Hi, I was looking into the changes

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Creating a new feature type and FeatureTypeInfo limitations

2010-03-19 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Right, this is done intentionally because we assume that an empty getAttributes() means derive them from the underlying feature type. The reason the persister uses getAttributes() and not attributes() is because if the attributes get stored on disk it then assumes the user has performed a

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3865) Layer fails to reproject to EPSG:27700 from WGS84 when WFS request specifies version 1.0.0

2010-03-19 Thread Keith Foster (JIRA)
Layer fails to reproject to EPSG:27700 from WGS84 when WFS request specifies version 1.0.0 -- Key: GEOS-3865 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3865

[Geoserver-devel] New functionality: creating new feature types with an sql query in jdbc data stores

2010-03-19 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, during the NY OpenGeo code sprint last month we've designed and coded support for what we call virtual tables, that is, feature types that are defined via a straight, native sql query. If you cannot wait to see the code there is a patch attached to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2123.

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3866) Query's typeName attribute not correctly parsed when using XML POST

2010-03-19 Thread Daniele Benegiamo (JIRA)
Query's typeName attribute not correctly parsed when using XML POST --- Key: GEOS-3866 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3866 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug

Re: [Geoserver-devel] New functionality: creating new feature types with an sql query in jdbc data stores

2010-03-19 Thread Ian Turton
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote: [... lots of cool stuff ...] This sounds really cool Andrea, I'll see if I can test it out next week before marking kicks in. I really wish I had known that the Java tribe was going to the NY Sprint as I'd have come over,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] New functionality: creating new feature types with an sql query in jdbc data stores

2010-03-19 Thread Andrea Aime
Ian Turton ha scritto: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote: [... lots of cool stuff ...] This sounds really cool Andrea, I'll see if I can test it out next week before marking kicks in. I really wish I had known that the Java tribe was going to the NY

[Geoserver-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOS-3867) Bug in display of image pyramid imagery

2010-03-19 Thread Stephen Mather (JIRA)
Bug in display of image pyramid imagery --- Key: GEOS-3867 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3867 Project: GeoServer Issue Type: Bug Environment: Windows 2003 Server R2, Standard Edition

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Image pyramid improvements and tutorial

2010-03-19 Thread Stephen V. Mather
Hi Andrea, I've submitted a bug report on JIRA. I have a ~80MB example zip. How would you prefer I send that to you? Steve Stephen Mather, GIS Manager Cleveland Metroparks 4101 Fulton Pkwy Cleveland, OH 44144 s...@clevelandmetroparks.com Phone: (216) 635-3243 FAX: (216) 635-3286

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Image pyramid improvements and tutorial

2010-03-19 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Qcuik questions: - are you adding a reprojection in the mix while you are doing this tests? - are all your granules of the same resolution? Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Image pyramid improvements and tutorial

2010-03-19 Thread Stephen V. Mather
Qcuik questions: - are you adding a reprojection in the mix while you are doing this tests? I have tried it both with and without reprojection, to the same effect. - are all your granules of the same resolution? Yes, they are all 0.15m pixels in 5000x4000 images. I have tried both leaving