Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geoserver-users] GeoServer PDF User manuals

2017-06-20 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hi Torben, On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:22:24 -0700, Torben Barsballe wrote: > ... > I've got a few quick questions for everyone concerning the GeoServer > PDF user manual: > > How many of you are: > Aware that a PDF version of the GeoServer User manual exists. > Use the PDF User manual or find

[Geoserver-devel] access to a layer's queryable flag through REST

2018-03-13 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hi, a week ago i posted this to the users list but got no response. would appreciate it if a GeoServer developer can find the time to give some feedback: quote unless i missed the obvious, using GeoServer 2.8.5 the 'Queryable' flag of a Layer appears in the [Edit Layer] Admin GUI page (under th

Re: [Geoserver-devel] access to a layer's queryable flag through REST

2018-03-14 Thread Raif S. Naffah
"alternate" > href=" > http://cloudsdi.geo-solutions.it/geoserver/rest/styles/polygon.xml"; > type=" application/xml"/> > > test:countries > http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; rel="alternate" > href=" > http://cloudsdi.geo-solutions.i

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer QA: asking users to help out?

2009-09-02 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello all, i'm one of those users "...lurking on this mailing list to 'check the pulse' of the development" as Andrea put it :-) i agree it's a great idea and am willing to help, but pls. consider this: * we include GeoServer in our application but we can not, or do not, always include the lates

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GeoServer QA: asking users to help out?

2009-09-03 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Jody, my comments are in-lined Jody Garnett wrote: >>> current GeoServer is at version 2.0 (unstable) / 1.7.6 (stable), we have >>> installations out there that have GeoServer versions 1.5.4b and 1.6.4b! >> Both dead for a long time >> > Dead may be too strong a word; a critical patch done

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geoserver-users] GSIP 26 - New GeoServer branding

2008-09-09 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Chris, one suggestion based on the fact that the image/icon part of the logo does not show our part of the world is possibly to have a pair, side by side, showing the other side of the globe; in ascii art: + + / \ / \ + + + GeoServer \ / \ / + + otherwise On Wed,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] [Geoserver-users] GSIP 26 - New GeoServer branding

2008-09-16 Thread Raif S. Naffah
; (we'll call this approach 'No Favorites') or one that includes all > > the continents ('Pangaea'), sticking with whichever looks best in > > the end. In order to provide concerned parties some time to give > > feedback we'll wait a couple of days bef

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [Geoserver-users] GSIP 26 - New GeoServer branding]

2008-09-17 Thread Raif S. Naffah
gt;> have been brought up here, namely: > >>>> 1) The color of the text 'GeoServer' in the powered-by logo does > >>>> not contrast with the background strongly enough to attract the > >>>> eye, and > >>>> 2) The eastern hemis

Re: [Geoserver-devel] 'Roadmap ideas'

2009-02-17 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Chris, apologies for barging in on the developers list but i didn't want to miss the opportunity for registering my enthusiastic approval for such an effort. this for sure is a valuable tool for people like me who are asked to help plan for future releases of a product that depends on G

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Removing a couple of extensions from GeoServer releases

2009-03-19 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello all, apologies for the intrusion on the list but may i suggest an alternative to simply removing those extensions which could be a potential source of funding for the GeoServer developers: grade the extensions, say into three levels of quality (high, medium, and low) and continue publish

Re: [Geoserver-devel] Removing a couple of extensions from GeoServer releases

2009-03-22 Thread Raif S. Naffah
hello Andrea, my comments are in-line. On Friday 20 March 2009 20:58:01 Andrea Aime wrote: > Raif S. Naffah ha scritto: > > hello all, > > > > apologies for the intrusion on the list but may i suggest an > > alternative to simply removing those extensions which could b