Re: [Geoserver-users] imageio-ext 1.1.18 (and 1.1.19) lacks content

Thank you for the swift response! These folders does not include the imageio-ext-1.1.X-jars.zip imageio-ext-1.1.X-javadocs.zip imageio-ext-1.1.X-netcdf.zip imageio-ext-1.1.X-sources.zip Not needed? Just to clarify, can you inform about the differences between the jars in

Re: [Geoserver-users] GeoServer Version not supporting Chrome?

Hello all, I am really excited to hear this answer. I am attempting to bring portions of a build i am working on to Android, and would like to continue to use Geoserver ( I would love to do it in a container as well, don't think that's fully flushed out yet). Thank you all, Joe On Tue, Dec 12,

Re: [Geoserver-users] imageio-ext 1.1.18 (and 1.1.19) lacks content

Hi Olle, Thanks for having reported that. We have updated these folders with the native content. Regards, Daniele On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Olle Markljung wrote: > Hi > > The page at http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/data/raster/gdal.html > kind of tells you

[Geoserver-users] imageio-ext 1.1.18 (and 1.1.19) lacks content

Hi The page at http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/data/raster/gdal.html kind of tells you to download ImageIO-Ext 1.1.16 artifacts. However the GDAL plugin of GeoServer 2.12.1 seems to use 1.1.18 and master 1.1.19. These folders are present at

Re: [Geoserver-users] GeoServer Version not supporting Chrome?

I have one more questions, I was wondering if the GeoServer Version 2.11+ can work on both Android and iOS platform? Thank you -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html -- Check

Re: [Geoserver-users] [layer group preview]Could not click on the map to view feature info

Hi, That is just a view of the rendered output but I don’t think I’ll be able to help you much without just having a look at the layers and trying to get my head round what you are trying to do. I have a heatmap layer and when I click on it in the layer preview I get a fid and grid from the

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

Thanks for the information -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

Thanks for the information -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

I had another look at your question, and in terms of what can go into a vector tile, its vectors. See https://github.com/mapbox/vector-tile-spec/tree/master/2.1 Section 4.3.4 From: br...@frogmouth.net

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

While you could vectorise the data on the server, its far from clear what you are trying to achieve here. If you've gone from "vector tiles are efficient" to "use vector tiles for netcdf-derived coverages", then I think that is unfortunate, and you really need to express what you are trying to

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

Actually, this started from looking into the advantages of vector tile formats such as TopoJSON that occupies less space and renders actual data to the client to allow dynamic styling at the client-side application and faster query. But I wonder whether such vector tiles are supported only for

Re: [Geoserver-users] Multidimensional netCDF to TopoJSON in GeoServer

I'm far from familiar with your use case, but I'm not following how this is going to work. What kind of JSON representation are you expecting from a netcdf coverage? What are you really trying to do here? That is, what is the purpose (functional use / business need) of the vector tiles? Brad