Seems the java 4 profile is including the java 5 modules.
Continuum wrote:
> http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/695
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash.
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/695
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Hi Geotools and GeoAPI community,
I have thought about expressions quite a lot in the last two weeks, as you may
have gathered from my previous mails. Jody has been so kind as to "introduce"
me to some basic concepts of the Expressions API as currently defined by GeoAPI
and GeoTools. In this ma
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> It should be revision 24275 according
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1160 but I need to check to be
> sure. The bug is related to interaction between different classes
> (especially "ProjectedCRS" vs "Conversion"), so the fix was not in a
> single place, b
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/688
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Dont' worry man,
I committed the test-case before comitting the code for it :-).
Sometimes continuum is faster than me :-(.
Simone.
On 2/19/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its look like I commited my changes in same time than other changes in
> GeoTIFF module (I did "svn upd
Its look like I commited my changes in same time than other changes in
GeoTIFF module (I did "svn update" and "mvn clean install" just before
to commit). The error in org.geotools.gce.geotiff.GeoTiffReaderTest is:
org.opengis.referencing.NoSuchAuthorityCodeException: No authority was
defined for c
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/686
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
I have set up a profile ( in unsupported/pom.xml) that includes the Java
5 unsupported modules.
I originally had two profiles (one for Java 1.4 and one for Java 5);
>
>
>
>
>
>
>1.4
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
So most of you have sat through this email already - I have drawn up a
"roadmap" picture and used it on the various development lists to
collect a few details about our future. Thanks to everyone for your help
and feedback!
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/GTSteering+2007+Q1
I would
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> Sounds great! Question is there any chance of combining the xml
>> plugins? Ie GML2 and Filter 1.0 kind of work togther, same deal for GML3
>> and Filter 1.1... perhaps we could reduce the number of plugins by
>> grouping compatible plugins together?
>>
> I am n
>>
> Sounds great! Question is there any chance of combining the xml
> plugins? Ie GML2 and Filter 1.0 kind of work togther, same deal for GML3
> and Filter 1.1... perhaps we could reduce the number of plugins by
> grouping compatible plugins together?
I am not sure others will agree. And i
Le lundi 19 février 2007 à 15:37 +0100, Andrea Aime a écrit :
> > [...snip...] Is it a big problem, or is it okay if
> > CRS.equalsIgnoreMetadata(ProjectedCRS, ProjectedCRS) work better only on
> > Geotools 2.4?
>
> Hum... well, is it something that happens only sometimes, on some
> obscure cases
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>
>> Question - these things are "plugins" for xml-xsd are they not? Well
>> everything other then "engine"...
>>
> They are not plugins. Not in the same sense as datastores anyways.
> Clients have to depend on the mo
Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>
> Question - these things are "plugins" for xml-xsd are they not? Well
> everything other then "engine"...
They are not plugins. Not in the same sense as datastores anyways.
Clients have to depend on the modules directly.
>
> Should we not have:
> - modules/library/x
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> I would like to change this structure to the following:
>>
>> unsupported/
>> xml-xsd/
>>engine/
>>gml2/
>>gml3/
>>filter/
>>sld/
>>
>> I figure that this will be a necessary step when it moves to supp
Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Andrea can we do any kind of "prescan" of the Expression? Ie making
>> sure all the decisions are
>> made once at the start of rendering - and then flying through
>> expression evaluation at runtime?
> Yes, we could. But that would add another level of care in order to
> mak
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/684
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Thanks Martin, Updating the review.txt file ... and marking the module
as broken on IP check.
(We will need to run our review process again prior to release I guess)
Jody
> A bunch of converter classes has been added to the org.geotools.util package
> in
> "main" module. Peoples who commited th
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/683
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the
Ciao guys,
I forgot to inform everybody that after a quick chat with Andrea we
recognized that we have not understood each other's point.
The solutions is that I will commit a deprecated version of the missing
classes in the coverage module, and not back in the main module,within this
evening in or
Agreed,
I understand the need to move classes around, but if its possible to
deprecate the old class, wether it just be a copy of the new one, or a
subclass of it as andrea suggests, I think we should do it.
-Justin
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Simone ha scritto:
>> Ciao Andrea,
>> I think I talked a bi
Bryce L Nordgren ha scritto:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/14/2007 01:38:48
> AM:
> Nope. Use the default (slow) generic service. I suspect that Geometry
> implementations will only offer services if there is a specific and
> substantial performance advantage over the generic services. Usi
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> It should be done on both the trunk and the 2.3 branch as of revision
> 24405. Could you check if it work as expected please?
It seems to be working fine, thank you. :-)
> By the way, the new CRS.lookupIdentifier(...) method should work fine
> for GeographicCRS,
Simone ha scritto:
> Ciao Andrea,
> I think I talked a bit about the issue you are bringing up before and
> meanwhile doing this work.
> This change MUST be done in an incompatible way if we want to have main
> NOT depending on coverage.
> Moreover, unless we want to create a circular dependecy t
Ciao Andrea,
I think I talked a bit about the issue you are bringing up before and
meanwhile doing this work.
This change MUST be done in an incompatible way if we want to have main NOT
depending on coverage.
Moreover, unless we want to create a circular dependecy there is no way to
use the usua
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> aaime wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering, since our AttributeExpressionImpl code is still
>> very slow due to pure dynamic evaluation of Class.isInstance
>> and Class.isAssignamentFrom (which, added, consume more than the
>> drawing time itself), I'm wondering if we could
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont think anyone will have any objections but I thought I would bring
> it up anyways. Currently the unsupported xml stuff is structured like:
>
> unsupported/
> xml-xsd/
> xml-gml2/
> xml-gml3/
> xml-filter/
> xml-sld/
>
> I wo
Hi all,
looking at people struggle to make Geoserver trunk
build again and looking at the changes performed,
it seems to me trunk has changed in incompatible
ways as a result of:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Cleaning+up+dependencies+between+various+modules+and+coverage
Classes have n
Hi all,
I think it's no news that svn performance do suck
on Windows.
What I did not know, is that you can make it a lot
faster by disabling "fast indexing".
On your project folders, right click, properties, advanced,
and then disable fast indexing.
Cheers
Andrea
-
30 matches
Mail list logo
