Re: [Geotools-devel] Splitting main further

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Simone ha scritto: > +1 about splitting but not too much :-). > > Ciao, > Simone. > > > Btw, Andrea I think we should report to the authorities about this use > using LSD! Well, I always had the impression that SLD and LSD were in fact related. Not sure whether it's advisable to get some LSD b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Summer of Code - mentors needed this week (replyto email if interested)

2007-03-08 Thread Simone
Ciao Jody, I added a couple of ideas to both geotools an geoserver. Tomorrow I might introduce more. Simone. --- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President/CEO GeoSolutions http://www.geo-solutions.it Via Carignoni 51 550141 Camaiore (LU) Italy Mobile

Re: [Geotools-devel] Splitting main further

2007-03-08 Thread Simone
+1 about splitting but not too much :-). Ciao, Simone. Btw, Andrea I think we should report to the authorities about this use using LSD! --- Eng. Simone Giannecchini President/CEO GeoSolutions http://www.geo-solutions.it Via Carignoni 51 55

Re: [Geotools-devel] DerivedCRS and resample

2007-03-08 Thread Simone
Ciao Martin, ciao Jan, Martin's idea is great. I have been playing lately on extending the HDF plugin that Martin and the guys working with him put inside trunk/spike. I need in a couple of month something more generic for netcdf, hdf and hdf-eos. So far I have been playing a bit with the Imagei

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Holmes
Jody Garnett wrote: Chris Holmes wrote: I would find it much more clear to make a class that does this in one pass; that is accepts a filter and outputs both an SQL statement and the leftover filter that could not be encoded. That way we do not split up decision making between two classes. N

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Holmes
Asking around there was tones of stuff that SQLUnpacker did not do ... talking to Jesse we cannot remember the details right now. Jesse has been fixing the PostPreProcessing but could not do all the simplification until he moves to trunk. Yeah, 'tons of stuff', but when I asked for details all

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Chris Holmes wrote: >> I would find it much more clear to make a class that does this in one >> pass; that is accepts a filter and outputs both an SQL statement and >> the leftover filter that could not be encoded. That way we do not >> split up decision making between two classes. > No, the rea

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Holmes
Jody Garnett wrote: Not sure off the of my head - what does the @deprecated annotation tell you to use? Oh I see PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor. Looks like a case of duplication of code; and the community going with the one that had more tests and was maintained. Asking around there wa

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Chris Holmes wrote: > Well thank you! (I wrote it, and was told that it was no longer good > enough) I second that Chris - good job (especially on the documentation). > The justification I got was that the superlongnamedvisitor had more > potential for extensibility, that in theory it'd be able

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Not sure off the of my head - what does the @deprecated annotation tell you to use? Oh I see PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor. Looks like a case of duplication of code; and the community going with the one that had more tests and was maintained. Asking around there was tones of stuff that SQ

Re: [Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Holmes
Well thank you! (I wrote it, and was told that it was no longer good enough) The justification I got was that the superlongnamedvisitor had more potential for extensibility, that in theory it'd be able to handle filters better. Which I concede, as sqlencoder isn't designed for filters, but

[Geotools-devel] PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor vs. SQLUnpacker

2007-03-08 Thread Farber, Saul (ENV)
This is kind of a targeted question, but I'll throw it out to the list to see if anyone else can answer too. Why is SQLUnpacker deprecated? Looking at PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor the only thing I can figure that it's doing that SQLUnpacker isn't doing is handling client-side transacti

Re: [Geotools-devel] Thumbs.db files

2007-03-08 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ooops, sorry :-). Simone. On 3/8/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reminder: please watchout when commiting a bunch of files with SVN. The > Windows > "Thumbs.db" file come up again and again in our SVN repository. It should not > be > there. > > modules/plugin/imagemosaic/sr

[Geotools-devel] Thumbs.db files

2007-03-08 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Reminder: please watchout when commiting a bunch of files with SVN. The Windows "Thumbs.db" file come up again and again in our SVN repository. It should not be there. modules/plugin/imagemosaic/src/test/resources/org/geotools/gce/imagemosaic/test-data/index/Thumbs.db modules/plugin/imagemosaic

Re: [Geotools-devel] FactoryWKT - Fixed

2007-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Martin; your change has fixed the problem. Cheers, Jody Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks Martin; I will not be able to test until late today (Java 6 + > Vista machine is at home). > > Jody > Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > --

[Geotools-devel] Google SoC wiki page for ideas

2007-03-08 Thread Jody Garnett
I have made our own Ideas page on the wiki ... please volunteer as a prospective mentor: - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Google+Summer+of+Code Jody - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join Sourc

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1193) Make DateUtils publish UTC offsets (and parse them too)

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Make DateUtils publish UTC offsets (and parse them too) --- Key: GEOT-1193 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1193 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: cor

Re: [Geotools-devel] concatenated transformation bug?

2007-03-08 Thread Jan Jezek
> >Its look like that ""S-JTSK (Ferro)" really don't have TOWGS84 parameters >defined in the EPSG database. Or maybe there is some but the epsg-hsql >plugin missed then. If you can find such parameter in the EPSG database or >if you can send us by email a transformation path that Geotools should ha

Re: [Geotools-devel] ISO Modular Standards & Cost Efficiency

2007-03-08 Thread Johnson, Steven E
Bryce et al, Interesting observations, and I'm not certain that the remarks that follow address the central question for the GeoTools project, since the community of 'newcomers' to ISO standards is large and I'm more in tune with the end users. With that in mind... I was in NC last week for th

[Geotools-devel] ISO Modular Standards & Cost Efficiency

2007-03-08 Thread Bryce L Nordgren
Andrea & GeoTools developers, I'm including a number of people from the US Technical Advisory Group to ISO TC/211 in this email, particularly the ones interested in "outreach". Believe it or not, that's a big thing right now, at least for the US contingent. Bearing in mind that no one here has th

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-1192) Make sure 2.4.x internals do not use old filters anymore

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Make sure 2.4.x internals do not use old filters anymore Key: GEOT-1192 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1192 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.4.0

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.4.x and 2.5.x scope now in Jira.

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Created/Linked jira items for that stuff: > > GeoTools 2.5.x: > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1191 FM Switch over to New > Feature Model > > GeoTools 2.4.x: > - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-830 FM Implement GeoAPI Type System > - http://jira.codehaus.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Suggesting some change on epsg extension and fallback mechanism

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Hello Andrea > > Thanks for you work on epsg extension and fallback. > > Andrea Aime a écrit : >> Working on the latter, I noticed that if I register programmaticaly >> a factory using FactoryFinder.addAuthorityFactory I then have to >> force a scan for plugins,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Suggesting some change on epsg extension and fallback mechanism

2007-03-08 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > I just noticed the following page: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOSDOC/Custom+projection+definition+in+Geoserver+1.5.0+%28onwards%29 > > > > Since Geoserver 1.5 searchs for "epsg.properties" file into the > "$datadir/user_projections" directory, shou