Ciao Martin,
for the moment I will try to leave with the 3D limitation we have. In
case it becomes too hard to live with it I will try to spare some time
for helping to finish the referencing3D work.
As of the getHorizontalCRS I have, as an experiment, substituted most
(if not all) uses of CRSUtil
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> I was not criticizing since I'm doing only a cleanup of geotools svn. Since
> I'm
> not touching to udig SVN, I'm not in position to make anything else than a "by
> the way" observation, and my observation may very well be irrelevant...
>
I understand, I did not tak
Jody Garnett a écrit :
> unless we commit jar files
> it is *very* hard to make udig something you can check out and build. We
> have done a lot of work with scripts and so on but it feels
> like a loosing battle. Svn is supposed to have the ability to link; but
> you need to link to another svn re
Hello Simone
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> I have checked around a bit and I have noticed that most part of the
> time the CRS.getHorizontalCRS method really means give the horizontal
> part of the crs, it does not seem to care much about having a derived
> crs. Do you think it could be possible
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> As a side note, uDig SVN has big files too, especially JAR files (actually,
> when
> I merge GeoTools and uDig in the same list, most huge files except the two
> first
> TIFF files are in uDig SVN).
>
Actually martin we are really stuck on a way forward for uDig sv
Ciao Martin,
I have checked around a bit and I have noticed that most part of the
time the CRS.getHorizontalCRS method really means give the horizontal
part of the crs, it does not seem to care much about having a derived
crs. Do you think it could be possible to slightly change the
behaviour of th
I noticed that JIRA.
However for the moment all I need is a mean to go from whatever CRS to WGS84.
Simone.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:23 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> > You can go directly using the later line. The referencing module should be
> > ab
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> You can go directly using the later line. The referencing module should be
> able
> to do all the required work.
Note however that such transform will not be invertible for mathematical reasons
(not implementation limitation). There was a request for making such tr
Thx a lot,
Simone.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:16 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> > in case I have an envelope with crs that is Compund with time and
> > depth and I want to go to WGS84 for it, should I firt get the
> > transform to to horizontal and then
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> in case I have an envelope with crs that is Compund with time and
> depth and I want to go to WGS84 for it, should I firt get the
> transform to to horizontal and then concanate with the transform to
> WGS84 or I that is done directly from
> CRS.findMathTransform(com
Ciao Martin,
in case I have an envelope with crs that is Compund with time and
depth and I want to go to WGS84 for it, should I firt get the
transform to to horizontal and then concanate with the transform to
WGS84 or I that is done directly from
CRS.findMathTransform(compoundCRS,DefaultGeographic.
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> go ahead and kill the branch man!
I just wonder, do you still need it? After I wrote my email, I had an idea that
may rescue the branch (but I'm not sure). Since I suspect that the 2.3 branch
has similar issue, I may attempt to do the rescue anyway...
Marti
On Jan 6, 2008 8:31 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Ramsey send to me a dump of our svn repository. The uncompressed dump
> size
> is 2.76 Gb
>
> After removing UDig except the required depencies (the GML module has its
> history in UDig), the dump size is 1.59 Gb.
>
> Af
On Monday 07 January 2008 09:47:15 am Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > So we should take this discussion to the geotools devel list so we can
> > figure out what can be done. Looks like the bug is assign to Mauricio -
> > perhaps he has some thoughts (or do
On Friday 04 January 2008, Jody Garnett wrote:
> So we should take this discussion to the geotools devel list so we can
> figure out what can be done. Looks like the bug is assign to Mauricio -
> perhaps he has some thoughts (or does not realize this is holding up
> your work?).
In my last mail I
15 matches
Mail list logo
