Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> Hmmm... it seems silly that false == BigInteger.instanceOf(155).equals(new
> BigInteger(155)), which is like what you're getting the assertion failure
> at..
The two 155 might be a BigInteger and a string (haven't actually looked
at the code so take it with a grain o
Hi Francisco,
I have looked over the code and commented on the jira issue.
-Justin
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Thanks Adrian. And nice work Fran. As Adrian says attach your code to a
> jira report and I will be happy to look it over.
>
> -Justin
>
> Adrian Custer wrote:
>> That sound fantastic
Hmmm... it seems silly that false == BigInteger.instanceOf(155).equals(new
BigInteger(155)), which is like what you're getting the assertion failure
at..
I've just committed an instanceof BigInteger assertion prior to that one, and
passes to me. Can you svn update and run the wfs tests again?
Ciao Martin,
please ignore the second email, the good one is the first one :-).
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> > As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
> > geophysics duality from the c
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
>> merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
>> thread on what the best coverage model is?
>
> Andrea, have you seen the proposal? the Raster symboli
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
> > Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
> > merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
> > thread on what the best coverage model is?
>
> Andr
I agree,
so should we vote? Should me and Alessio proceed without a formal vote?
I will send a last separate email for the old thread,
Simone.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> > Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> >> As you mi
Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Guys, we're going completely off track. Can we talk about the
> merits of the raster symbolizer proposal and eventually spawn another
> thread on what the best coverage model is?
Andrea, have you seen the proposal? the Raster symbolizer is not just a raster
symbolizer prop
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
>> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
>> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop
>> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some
>> time in that direction
Hi,
my build on trunk is failing in the wfs module with the following test
failure:
---
Test set: org.geotools.wfs.WFSParsingTest
---
Tests run:
I'm repeating my self, but I want to stretch very loudly the following:
--
The "sample to geophysics" transform defines the
conversion from pixel units to geophysics units.
---
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
> geophysics duality from the coverage themselves so that we stop
> running into the duality images vs models this is trying to push some
> time in that direction.
Giving more though to that since th
Thanks for taking some time to review martin...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Please take a look and review at
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
>
> I had a quick look to the
Thanks for taking some time to review martin...
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Please take a look and review at
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
>
> I had a quick look to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Please take a look and review at
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Raster+Symbolizer+support
I had a quick look to the interfaces at:
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/2.4.x_rs/modules/library/render/src/main/java/org/geotools/renderer/coverage/cate
Hi Alessio,
Great proposal! Very complete. I dont know much about raster realm so I
dont think i can give much good feedback, but +1 just based on
presentation :).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the GeoTools Raster Symbolizer support proposal page is
> ready.
> Please take a look and
16 matches
Mail list logo
