Re: [Geotools-devel] JDBC DataStore NG Proposal

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Matthias, You actually make a really good point. One thing we found when implementing the oracle dialect is that we did indeed have to change the interface quite a bit. Once this interface is "out in the field" this will indeed become problematic and we won't have the freedom to change api

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDBC DataStore NG Proposal

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Jody, First thing i want to make clear is that this is not the proposal to make these things supported, just to restructure and continue to work on getting them to supported. Having them in a single "h2" module is not scaling and preventing us from effectively getting the real world resting

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDBC DataStore NG Proposal

2008-10-06 Thread Matthias Basler
Justin wrote: > I have thrown together an official proposal for the new jdbc datastore > stuff: > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Next+Generation+JDBC+DataStore > > Comments/feedback welcome. Since I already have classes in my own code base that account for SQL dialects I can only

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDBC DataStore NG Proposal

2008-10-06 Thread Jody Garnett
The module restructuring is interesting; in general I like the layout of "plugins" "library" etc... it lets people know what they are getting into ... however I understand that build structure may be non optimal product packaging. Can we retire the existing module after this proposal is accepte

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Justin, just uploaded the binaries and source artifacts again, this time with the patched GeoTools.java for the version number. Also confirmed that we need to build without -Dall before running assembly:assembly for it not to include the unsupported modules. Cheers, Gabriel Justin Deoliveira esc

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Awesome, grabbed the archive and uploaded to sourceforge. We can finally release now! Thanks again Cédric :). Cédric Briançon wrote: > Added a link on the page http://javadoc.geotools.fr/ to donwload the zip > version of the javadoc 2.5.0. > > > Justin Deoliveira a écrit : >> Cédric, you are m

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
Added a link on the page http://javadoc.geotools.fr/ to donwload the zip version of the javadoc 2.5.0. Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > Cédric, you are my hero :). One more request though: would I be able > to get them zipped up from there? > > Cédric Briançon wrote: >> The javadoc has been correc

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Cédric, you are my hero :). One more request though: would I be able to get them zipped up from there? Cédric Briançon wrote: > The javadoc has been correctly deployed. > You can retrieve all javadocs here : http://javadoc.geotools.fr/ > For the one you are requesting, it is http://javadoc.geotoo

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
The javadoc has been correctly deployed. You can retrieve all javadocs here : http://javadoc.geotools.fr/ For the one you are requesting, it is http://javadoc.geotools.fr/2.5/ Cheers, Cédric. Cédric Briançon a écrit : > Gabriel Roldan a écrit : > >> I may be wrong, but afaik you should be usin

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
Gabriel Roldan a écrit : > I may be wrong, but afaik you should be using -Dall not -Pall. That > is, "all" is an activation keyword for the different profiles? > Yes it works, thanks Gabriel :) > Gabriel > Cédric Briançon escribió: >> Justin, when I build with the option -Pall, I can see that not

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Gabriel Roldan
I may be wrong, but afaik you should be using -Dall not -Pall. That is, "all" is an activation keyword for the different profiles? Gabriel Cédric Briançon escribió: > Justin, when I build with the option -Pall, I can see that not all > modules have been built. For example coverageio doesn't own

Re: [Geotools-devel] status of 2.5.0 release

2008-10-06 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Jody Garnett escribió: > Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> A couple things: >> I'm uploading the exported user guide for you. >> There's a step missing in the "how to cut a release" document, which >> is to modify the file >> modules/library/metadata/src/main/java/org/geotools/factory/GeoTools.java >> >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
Justin, when I build with the option -Pall, I can see that not all modules have been built. For example coverageio doesn't own a target directory after the command : mvn install -Pall. But some of unsupported modules are compiled, as you can see here : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Developpement/Geotools/

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Great, that would be much appreciated Cédric. Thanks for the help :). -Justin Cédric Briançon wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Justin Deoliveira a écrit : >> I have the release announcement ready to go and i am ready to hit the >> "publish" button, but we still have no javadocs. As I understand it >> t

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Cédric Briançon
Hi Justin, Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > I have the release announcement ready to go and i am ready to hit the > "publish" button, but we still have no javadocs. As I understand it > there are people who have successfully generated them with java 6? I > have not been able to so if someone could

[Geotools-devel] 2.5.0 ready to go, still no javadocs

2008-10-06 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I have the release announcement ready to go and i am ready to hit the "publish" button, but we still have no javadocs. As I understand it there are people who have successfully generated them with java 6? I have not been able to so if someone could do this that would be great. If no one pipes u

Re: [Geotools-devel] Some Date-Fixes in GeoTools 2.4.x Branch for Oracle Datastore

2008-10-06 Thread Andrea Aime
Tim Englich wrote: > Hi list, > > I have done some fixes in the Oracle Datastore on the 2.4.x Branch. > There are again Date-Support Issues in Queryhandling. > I create a patch file. > Can anyone take a look at it? > May I check in these Changes? Tim, I'm going to have a look at the patch tomorro

[Geotools-devel] Some Date-Fixes in GeoTools 2.4.x Branch for Oracle Datastore

2008-10-06 Thread Tim Englich
Hi list, I have done some fixes in the Oracle Datastore on the 2.4.x Branch. There are again Date-Support Issues in Queryhandling. I create a patch file. Can anyone take a look at it? May I check in these Changes? Tim <> ### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0 #P gt2-oracle-spatial Index: src/main/jav